System, method and article of manufacture for automated fit and size predictions

• US 20020138170A1
• Filed: 12/20/2001
• Published: 09/26/2002
• Est. Priority Date: 12/20/2000
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: True Fit Corp.
• Original Assignee: Bonny J. Schwenke, Christopher B. Dingle, Mads V. Pedersen, Matthew S. Clark, Vsevolod A. Onyshkevych
• Inventors: Dingle, Christopher B., Clark, Matthew S., Onyshkevych, Vsevolod A., Pedersen, Mads V., Schwenke, Bonny J.
• Granted Patent: US 6,665,577 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 700/130
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/06 Buying, selling or leasing transactions

Abstract

The present invention relates to an automated system, method and article of manufacture for determining the most appropriate fit and size of a garment, based on either or both customer preference or/and set objective criteria, for a particular garment dimension or a plurality of garment dimensions as they relate to a consumer body dimension or dimensions and the ideal body dimension or dimensions for that garment or for a range of garments.

Claims

1. A method for determining the fit of a garment on a user comprising the steps of:

providing a first database to store and provide information including a set of fit scores which relate at least one of possible body dimension measurements to a corresponding garment dimension of a selected garment;

receiving at least one user body dimension measurement for said user corresponding to said garment dimension; and

determining at least one user fit score for said garment dimension based at least in part on said at least one user body dimension measurement corresponding to said garment dimension.

2. A method as defined in claim 1 further including determining an overall fit score for said garment based at least in part on said at least one user fit score.

3. A method as defined in claim 2 further comprising the steps of:

providing said user with said overall fit score; and

recommending a size of said garment to said user based at least in part on said overall fit score.

4. A method as defined in claim 3 wherein said first database also includes a second database to store and provide information including a purchase selection.

5. A method as defined in claim 4 wherein said garment dimension includes garment dimensions for a plurality of garments.

6. A method as defined in claim 4 further comprising receiving garment preference information from said user.

7. A method as defined in claim 4 further comprising the steps of:

assigning a personal identifier to identify said user;

storing said personal identifier in said second database; and

providing said personal identifier to said user.

8. A method as defined in claim 7 further comprising providing said user with a user satisfaction survey and storing said user satisfaction survey in said second database.

9. A method as defined in claim 4 further comprising storing said at least one user body dimension measurement in said second database.

10. A method as defined in claim 9 wherein receiving said at least one user body dimension measurement includes receiving said at least one user body dimension measurement from a three-dimensional body scanner.

11. A method as defined in claim 10 wherein said three-dimensional body scanner also includes a scanning booth.

12. A method as defined in claim 9 wherein receiving said at least one user body dimension measurement includes receiving said at least one user body dimension measurement by using a tape measure.

13. A method as defined in claim 12 wherein said tape measure includes an electronic tape measure.

14. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein determining at least one user fit score further includes developing at least one fit curve on an xy-axis with an x-axis representing said at least one possible body dimension measurement for said corresponding garment dimension and a y-axis representing one of said at least one fit score for said corresponding garment dimension.

15. A method as defined in claim 14 wherein said at least one user fit score includes a fit score between a specified range having limits, wherein said limits of said specified range represent an unwearable fit and a perfect fit.

16. A method as defined in claim 15 wherein said specified range is between 0 and 1;

and wherein a fit score of 0 represents an unwearable fit and a fit score of 1 represent a perfect fit.

17. A method as defined in claim 16 wherein said fit curve includes a linear segment representing a perfect user fit range, a linear segment representing a near perfect user fit range tighter than a perfect user fit, a linear segment representing a near perfect user fit range larger than a perfect fit, a linear segment representing a small but wearable user fit range, a linear segment representing a loose but wearable user fit range, a linear segment representing a small but marginally wearable user fit range, a linear segment representing a loose but marginally wearable user fit range, and a linear segment representing an unwearably small user fit range, wherein any point on a segment corresponds to a user fit score.

18. A method as defined in claim 17 wherein said fit curve further includes a linear segment representing an unwearably loose user fit range.

19. A method as defined in claim 15 further comprising storing said fit curve in said first database.

20. A method as defined in claim 19 wherein determining said at least one user fit score further comprises evaluating said at least one user body dimension measurement using said at least said fit curve, and determining a corresponding one of said at least one user fit score.

21. A method as defined in claim 20 further including determining a dimensional fit rating comprising the steps of:

comparing said at least one user dimension measurements to possible body dimension measurements for said selected garment for each garment dimension; and

determining at least one star rating for said garment by multiplying each one of said at least one user fit score for each said garment dimension;

wherein said at least one star rating corresponds to a size of said selected garment.

22. A method as defined in claim 21 further comprising the steps of:

comparing one of said at least one star rating of said selected garment to a second of said at least one star rating corresponding to a different size of said selected garment;

selecting a preferred star rating corresponding to one of said compared star ratings; and

providing said user a size of said garment selection with said preferred star rating.

23. A method as defined in claim 22 wherein said star rating includes a relative weighting factor.

24. A method as defined in claim 22 wherein said star rating includes a scaling factor.

25. A method as defined in claim 23 wherein said star rating includes a scaling factor.

26. A method as defined in claim 5 further comprising providing access to information relating to said fit of a garment on a user.

27. A method as defined in claim 26 further comprising providing access to information relating to said fit of a garment on said user.

28. A method as defined in claim 26 wherein providing access to said information includes paying a fee for said access.

29. A method as defined in claim 26 further comprising providing said user with an identification card for accessing said information.

30. A method as defined in claim 27 wherein accessing said information includes accessing said information on a website.

31. A method as defined in claim 27 wherein accessing said information includes accessing said information from a wireless personal data assistant.

32. A method as defined in claim 27 wherein accessing said information includes accessing said information from a self-service kiosk.

33. A system for determining the fit of a garment for a user, said system comprising:

a user network access device for inputting and retrieving information;

said user network access device connected to a public access network and in communication with a processor;

said processor for accepting, evaluating, providing and maintaining information to determine a user fit of a garment for said user;

a garment provider network access device in communication with said processor;

a body measurement device;

said processor having a first database to store and provide information;

said first database including a set of fit scores which relate at least one of possible first body dimension measurements to a corresponding first garment dimension of a selected garment;

wherein said processor receives a first body dimension measurement for said user; and

determines a user fit score for said garment dimension corresponding to said user first body dimension measurement.

34. A system as defined in claim 33 wherein said first body dimension measurements include second body dimension measurements and said first garment dimension includes a second garment dimension.

35. A system as defined in claim 33 wherein said body measurement device includes a three-dimensional body scanner.

36. A system as defined in claim 34 wherein said three-dimensional body scanner includes a scanning booth.

37. A system as defined in claim 35 wherein said body measurement device includes an electronic tape measure connected to said first user network access device for electronically inputting user body measurements.

38. A system as defined in claim 33 wherein said body measurement device includes a tape measure for recording said user body measurement and manually inputting said first user body measurement into said user network access device.

39. A system as defined in claim 33 wherein said processor receives information from said garment network access device including garment dimensions.