More efficient and environmentally-desirable means of detecting insects entering lure-baited traps or attractive areas

• US 20020144452A1
• Filed: 03/15/2002
• Published: 10/10/2002
• Est. Priority Date: 04/06/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Morton Beroza
• Original Assignee: Morton Beroza
• Inventors: Beroza, Morton
• Application Number:
  US10/097,629
• Publication Number:
  US 20020144452A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 43/107
• CPC Class Codes: A01M 1/026 combined with devices for monitoring insect presence, e.g. termites bait stations A01M1/2005; detecting other animals in a given area A01M31/002
• CPC Class Codes: A01M 1/106 for flying insects
• CPC Class Codes: A01M 1/14 Catching by adhesive surfaces
• CPC Class Codes: A01M 1/2027 without heating
• CPC Class Codes: A01M 2200/012 Flying insects

Abstract

Detection and monitoring of insects of a given species can be facilitated by placing inside each lure-baited trap a microchip assembly that can sense the presence of that species (usually by the sound it makes); and then send electronic signals by satellite, internet, or antennae to a central monitoring station equipped with software that will identify locations of the traps (usually by trap number) as well as map locations of positive trap responses. Variations in the foregoing are: selection of species sound range may be made by microchip or by software at central monitoring station, use of multi-lure traps, periodic transfer of trap responses, method of determining whether the system is working properly, and use of microchip assembly units without traps to monitor sound-emitting life forms at sites attractive to the targeted species.

Claims

1. Method of facilitating detection of insects (or other life forms) of a given species in agricultural or other areas by placing inside each lure-baited trap a microchip that will detect the presence of an insect of that species (usually by the sound it makes), and then send an electronic signal (digitized sound preferred) via satellite, internet, or antennae to a central monitoring station equipped with software that will identify positive trap responses and their locations as well as map locations of the positive responses.

2. Method of claim 1 in which lures for more than one insect species are put into each trap if it is shown that captures of the individual species are not decreased significantly when compared with their captures in traps baited with a single lure;

with multi-lure traps, computers have to be set up with software that will monitor the captures of each species separately, generally by difference in the sound frequency response range of each species.

3. Method of claim 1 in which the microchip(s) in the trap(s) can be adjusted so that the sound(s) received and the signal(s) sent to the central monitoring station can be varied for each targeted species.

4. Method of claim 1 in which trap signals are collected in the trap and then transmitted at given time intervals (e.g., several times a day) to the central computer.

5. Method of claim 1 in which the computer receiving signals of trap captures can determine periodically whether the microchips are working properly by sending a positive signal of the targeted species to all the traps to determine whether the microchips are responding. Microchips not responding properly can then be replaced or repaired.

6. Method of claim 1 in which the microchip assemblies are not placed in traps but at attractive locations, e.g., at or near certain plants or trees, or water sources that attract insects or animals that emit specific sounds;

sounds of the targeted species received at the monitoring station indicate the location(s) of the targeted species.