Method for designing demand-sensitive rings

• US 20030009598A1
• Filed: 04/12/2001
• Published: 01/09/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 04/12/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: AT&T Corporation (AT&T, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: AT&T Corporation (AT&T, Inc.)
• Inventors: Gunluk, Oktay Necip, Klincewicz, John, Munson, Beth
• Application Number:
  US09/833,322
• Publication Number:
  US 20030009598A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/251
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 45/02 Topology update or discovery

Abstract

A method for provisioning a ring-based network is based on a routing of demands on shortest paths, according to a routing metric, and then assigning the routed demands to a collection of rings provisioned from a set of rings that meets preselected criteria, such as having less than a given number of nodes, and a mileage measure that is less than a given mileage upper threshold. The rings are provisioned to minimize a cost function that accounts for the cost of covering demands in rings, and the cost of failing to cover demands in rings. Further, an ordering of the traffic demands is determined that allows for routing as many traffic demands as possible.

Claims

1. A method carried out in a computer for provisioning rings in a ring-based network having a given topology of nodes and logical links that interconnect said nodes, and a set of traffic demands that is desired for said network to carry, comprising the steps of:

executing a process that identifies a set of feasible rings in said network, which is a subset of all possible rings in said network that satisfy a given constraint;

executing a process of identifying a routing for the traffic demands in said set of traffic demands, while aiming to minimize both a number of traffic demands that are not routed and an overall routing metric, where the routing metric is a cost measure that is associated with using one of said logical links in a routing path of a demand;

identifying a set of rings from among a set of feasible rings that minimizes a ring assignments cost measure that includes a cost associated with not covering routed demands with rings and a cost associated with using rings to cover demands; and

outputting the set of rings developed by said step of identifying for provisioning said nodes of said network.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of provisioning said nodes of said network in accordance with said set of rings developed by said step of identifying.

4. The method of claim 3 where said provisioning is accomplished through electronic transmission of information from said computer to said nodes of said network.

5. The method of claim 1 where said process of identifying a routing for the traffic demands

(a) considers a routing path for each of said demands, starting with the demand having a lowest routing path cost, based on a table that identifies a path having a lowest routing path cost for each arbitrary pair of nodes of said network;

(b) assigns a demand to said path having said lowest routing path cost, if capacity exists on said path having said lowest routing path cost;

(c) assigns said demand to a path having a higher routing path cost if capacity does not exist on said path having said lowest routing path cost; and

(d) leaves said demand un-routed if capacity does not exist on any path that can carry said demand, thereby obtaining an identified routing of said demands.

6. The method of claim 1 where said process of identifying a routing for the traffic demands employs a shortest routing path metric

7. The method of claim 1 where said process of identifying a routing for the traffic demands identifies a set of demand routings A by:

(a) considering a routing path for each of said demands, starting with the demand having a lowest routing path cost, based on a table that identifies a path having a lowest routing path cost for each arbitrary pair of nodes of said network;

(b) assigning a demand to said path having said lowest routing path cost, if capacity exists on said path having said lowest routing path cost;

(c) assigning said demand to a path having a higher routing path cost if capacity does not exist on said path having said lowest routing path cost;

(d) leaving said demand un-routed if capacity does not exist on any path that can carry said demand, thereby obtaining a first identified routing of said demands, B;

(e) changing order in which said demands are considered and repeating steps (b), (c), and (d) to result in a second identified routing of said demands, C; and

(f) assigning A=B when number of un-routed demands in B is less than number of un-routed demands in C, and A=C when number of un-routed demands in B is not less than number of un-routed demands in C.

8. The method of claim 7 where said table is pre-computed.

9. The method of claim 1 where said step of identifying a set of rings employs an integer linear programming module to obtain said set of rings that minimizes said ring assignments cost function.

10. The method of claim 1 where said ring assignments cost function is

2. The method of claim 2 where said constraint requires a feasible ring to have not more than a given number of nodes, and have a mileage cost that is not more than a given mileage cost.