Standards-based adaptive educational measurement and assessment system and method

• US 20030017442A1
• Filed: 06/17/2002
• Published: 01/23/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 06/15/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Scantron Corporation (MX Holdings One LLC)
• Original Assignee: Scantron Corporation (MX Holdings One LLC)
• Inventors: Manning, Meredith L., OʼHair, John, Tudor, William P.
• Application Number:
  US10/174,085
• Publication Number:
  US 20030017442A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/322
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/04 characterised by modifying the teaching programme in response to a wrong answer, e.g. repeating the question, supplying a further explanation

Abstract

An educational method and system that assess and enhances a student'"'"'s understanding in a subject. Based on the student'"'"'s grade or instructional level, individually tailored tests are generated whose difficulties are geared toward the student'"'"'s level of understanding in the subject. The adaptive measurement application system uses a plurality of learning objectives for a number of different subjects coupled to specialized questions to accurately assess a student'"'"'s academic ability. An expert system uses this database of learning objectives and questions to quickly determine a student'"'"'s ability without forcing the student to have to answer large number of questions. The adaptive measurement application system also employs a curriculum alignment guide to accurately align and report the data in accordance with varying national, state, school district, or school standards.

Claims

1. A test system for standards-based measurement of an individual'"'"'s knowledge and proficiency comprising:

an item bank comprised of a plurality of questions, each question associated with a learning objective and each learning objective having an associated score;

a set of standards associated with the learning objectives;

an expert modeling system which controls which question from the item bank will be presented to the individual;

an adaptive measurement system which presents a question to the individual and, depending on whether the answer is correct or incorrect, adjusts the difficulty of the subsequent questions either up or down until the difficulty of the questions are representative of the individual'"'"'s knowledge and proficiency; and

a curriculum alignment guide which recognizes the score for each question and adjusts the score so that when a report is generated, the individual'"'"'s knowledge and proficiency are aligned to the standards associated with the learning objectives.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the item bank contains over one thousand items.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the individual is selected from the group consisting of a student between grades two and twelve, a university student, and an applicant for a professional license or degree.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the standards are selected from the group consisting of school, district, county, state and national standards.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein the test system is accessed over the Internet.

6. The system of claim 5, wherein reports are generated from the scores immediately at the conclusion of the test so that data-driven decisions can be made immediately.

7. An item bank for use in a system for standards-based adaptive assessment, said item bank comprising:

a plurality of learning objectives ranging from grades two to twelve, wherein said learning objectives are derived from district, state and national standards and high-stakes tests.

8. The item bank of claim 7, wherein said plurality of learning objectives are about one thousand in number.

9. The item bank of claim 8, wherein the plurality of learning objectives are related to a plurality of disciplines or subjects with specialized questions for each discipline or subject to accurately diagnose the individual'"'"'s knowledge and proficiency.

10. A method for standards-based adaptive assessment comprising:

using an item bank containing a plurality of learning objectives, each learning objective being related to a specific standard and represented by a specific question;

entering the test taker into the test at their assigned instructional level;

beginning with one or two units of material to determine the starting instructional level of the test taker;

presenting a learning objective to the test taker in the form of a question designed to test knowledge of that learning objective;

allowing the test taker to respond, wherein if the response is correct, a more difficult learning objective, in the form of a question, is presented to the test taker and a virtual floor is created, which indicates that the test taker knows the material below that point, and wherein if the response is incorrect, a less difficult learning objective, in the form of a question, is presented to the test taker and a virtual ceiling is created, which indicates that the test taker does not know the material above that point;

moving the test taker through the test at their instructional level through branching,

wherein when the test taker'"'"'s instructional level in the first unit is reached, subsequent units are presented;

stopping the test when the test taker'"'"'s instructional level is determined by the system;

reporting a unit progression index for each unit;

correlating the unit progression index with the relevant standards; and

displaying the results in the form of a report.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein said method is employed from a location remote to the item bank.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the Internet is used.

13. The method of claim 10, wherein the item bank contains over one thousand items.

14. The method of claim 10, wherein the standards are selected from the group consisting of school, district, county, state and national standards.

15. The method of claim 10, wherein the reports are generated from the scores immediately at the conclusion of the test so that data-driven decisions can be made immediately.