Method and apparatus for evaluating relative performance of a business in an association of the same or similar businesses

• US 20030050830A1
• Filed: 09/13/2001
• Published: 03/13/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 09/13/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: PPG Industries Ohio Incorporated (Nouryon BV)
• Original Assignee: PPG Industries Ohio Incorporated (Nouryon BV)
• Inventors: Troyer, William
• Application Number:
  US09/952,002
• Publication Number:
  US 20030050830A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/11
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0639 Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06398 Performance of employee with respect to a job function

Abstract

A method of evaluating the business performance of a member such as an automotive collision repair shop in an association of members in the same or similar business. Data on the business performance of the members in the association is maintained in a computer database. The individual member being evaluated electronically submits performance data to the computer containing the database. The data submitted is compared to the data on other association members stored in the database. A report on the comparison is provided back to the individual member.

Claims

1. A method of evaluating the performance of an individual member of an association of members in the same or similar business comprising the steps of:

(1) providing a computer database containing performance data on members of the association;

(2) electronically submitting data on performance of the individual member to the computer database of step (1);

(3) evaluating the data submitted in step (2) for compliance with predetermined business performance standards and comparing the data submitted in step (2) with the data in the database of step (1) via software in the computer of step (1); and

(4) reporting the evaluation and comparison of the data performed in step (3) to the individual member.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of updating the computer database of step (1) with the data submitted in step (2).

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the computer database of step (1) includes data on at least one business performance parameter selected from the group consisting of facilities, labor and employment information, overhead information, administrative management procedures, financial information, personnel management procedures, production procedures, use of tools for sales and marketing, and procedures for protecting health and safety.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the data submitted in step (2) identifies the particular business of the individual member and step (3) selects data in the database of step (1) of the other association members in the same business as the individual member for comparison to the data submitted by the individual member.

5. The method of claim 1 in which the individual member is an automotive collision repair shop.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the automotive collision repair shop is selected from the group consisting of an independent repair shop, an automobile dealership, a franchise shop, and a fleet repair shop.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the data submitted in step (2) identifies a labor rate and step (3) selects data in the database of step (1) of the other association members having the same labor rate as the individual member being evaluated.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein step (4) comprises electronically reporting the comparison made in step (3) to the individual member being evaluated.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein step (4) comprises creating a printed report of the comparison made in step (3).

10. The method of claim 1 wherein step (4) includes providing recommendations to improve the performance of the individual member being evaluated.

11. A method of evaluating the performance of an automotive collision repair shop comprising the steps of:

(1) providing a computer database containing performance data on automotive collision repair shops;

(2) electronically submitting data on performance of an automotive collision repair shop to the computer database of step (1);

(3) evaluating the data submitted in step (2) for compliance with predetermined business performance standards and comparing the data submitted in step (2) with the data in the database of step (1) via software in the computer of step (1); and

(4) reporting the evaluation and comparison of the data performed in step (3) to the automotive collision repair shop of step (2).

12. The method of claim 11 further comprising the step of updating the computer database of step (1) with the data submitted in step (2).

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the computer database of step (1) includes data on at least one business performance parameter selected from the group consisting of facilities, labor and employment information, overhead information, administrative management procedures, financial information, personnel management procedures, production procedures, use of tools for sales and marketing, and procedures for protecting health and safety.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein the automotive collision repair shop of step (2) is a shop type selected from the group consisting of an independent repair shop, an automobile dealership, a franchise shop, and a fleet repair shop.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein the data of the automotive collision repair shops compared in step (3) are for shops of the same shop type as the automotive collision repair shop being evaluated.

16. The method of claim 11 wherein the data submitted in step (2) identifies a labor rate and step (3) selects data in the database of step (1) of automotive collision repair shops having the same labor rate as the automotive collision repair shop being evaluated.

17. The method of claim 11 wherein step (4) comprises electronically reporting the comparison made in step (3) to the automotive collision repair shop being evaluated.

18. The method of claim 11 wherein step (4) includes providing recommendations to improve the performance of the automotive collision repair shop being evaluated.

19. A performance analysis system comprising:

(a) a central computer storing a database containing data on business performance of an association of members in the same or similar businesses;

(b) a remote computer located at an individual member'"'"'s place of business, said remote computer being electronically communicable with the central computer such that data on performance of the individual member is electronically transferable to said central computer; and

(c) software installed on said central computer for evaluating performance data transferred from said remote computer to said data stored in said database.

20. The system of claim 19 wherein said database includes data on at least one business performance parameter selected from the group consisting of facilities, labor and employment information, overhead information, financial information, administrative management procedures, personnel management procedures, production procedures, use of tools for sales and marketing, and procedures for protecting health and safety.

21. The system of claim 19 wherein said software is configured to identify the particular business of the individual member and to select data in said database of the other association members in the same business as the individual member for comparison to the data submitted by the individual member.

22. The system of claim 19 wherein the members listed in said database are automotive collision repair shops.

23. An automotive collision repair shop performance analysis system comprising:

(a) a central computer storing a database containing data on business performance of automotive collision repair shops;

(b) a remote computer located at a remote automotive collision repair shop, said remote computer being electronically communicable with the central computer such that data on performance of the remote automotive repair shop is electronically transferable to said central computer; and

(c) software installed on said central computer for evaluating performance data transferred from said remote computer to said data stored in said database.

24. The system of claim 23 wherein said database includes data on at least one business performance parameter selected from the group consisting of facilities, labor and employment information, overhead information, financial information, administrative management procedures, personnel management procedures, production procedures, use of tools for sales and marketing, and procedures for protecting health and safety.

25. The method of claim 23 wherein the automotive collision repair shop having said remote computer is a shop type selected from the group consisting of an independent repair shop, an automobile dealerships, a franchise shop, and a fleet repair shop.

26. The method of claim 25 wherein said software is configured to identify the shop type of the automotive collision repair shop having said remote computer and to select data for evaluation in said database of the automotive collision repair shops having the same shop type as the remote automotive collision repair shop.