Ophthalmic instrument having hartmann wavefront sensor with extended source

• US 20030053031A1
• Filed: 08/31/2001
• Published: 03/20/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 08/31/2001
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Adaptive Optics Associates Inc (Northrop Grumman Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Adaptive Optics Associates Inc (Northrop Grumman Corporation)
• Inventors: Wirth, Allan
• Granted Patent: US 6,595,642 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 351/221
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 3/1015 for wavefront analysis
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 3/103 for determining refraction, e.g. refractometers, skiascopes
• CPC Class Codes: A61L 31/048 obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds A61L31/041 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: C08L 27/16 Homopolymers or copolymers or vinylidene fluoride

Abstract

An improved ophthalmic instrument including an extended source producing light that is formed as an image on the retina of the human eye and reflected there from to produce retinal reflections derived from the extended source, and a wavefront sensor that estimates aberrations in the retinal reflections. The wavefront sensor includes a plurality of subapertures that form a plurality of images of the extended source from the retinal reflections, an imaging device that captures the plurality of images and outputs image data representing the images, and an image processing computer that generates an estimate of the gradient field of the retinal reflections by applying image correlation techniques in the digital domain to the image data. The image processing computer preferably generates an estimate of the local tilt of the retinal reflections incident on a given subaperture by deriving a correlation product for a given image formed by the given subaperture and identifying a peak correlation point of the correlation product. The dimensions of the image of the extended source formed on the retina of the human eye is preferably larger that a diffraction limited spot yet small enough so that different parts of the image do not experience substantially different aberrations while passing through the eye. In addition, the angular size of the image of the extended source is preferably limited so that the plurality of images formed by the subapertures do not overlap.

Claims

1. An ophthalmic instrument comprising:

an extended source producing light that is formed as an image on the retina of the human eye and reflected there from to produce retinal reflections derived from said extended source; and

a wavefront sensor that estimates aberrations in said retinal reflections, wherein said wavefront sensor comprises;

a plurality of subapertures that form a plurality of images of the extended source from said retinal reflections;

an imaging device that captures said plurality of images and outputs image data representing said images; and

an image processing computer that generates an estimate of the gradient field of said retinal reflections by applying image correlation techniques in the digital domain to said image data.

2. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 1, wherein said image processing computer generates an estimate of the local tilt of said retinal reflections incident on a given subaperture by deriving a correlation product for a given image form by the given subaperture 2514_j and identifying a peak correlation point of said correlation product.

3. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 1, wherein dimensions of the image of the extended source formed on the retina of the human eye is larger that a diffraction limited spot yet small enough so that different parts of the image do not experience substantially different aberrations while passing through the human eye.

4. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 1, wherein angular size of the image of said extended source is limited so that said plurality of images formed by said subapertures do not overlap.

5. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 4, wherein angular size of the image of said extended source is limited by an aperture stop at the input image plane of the wavefront sensor.

6. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 2, wherein said correlation product is defined by a sum of squared differences.

7. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 2, wherein said correlation product is defined by a sum of products function.

8. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 2, wherein said correlation product is derived from multiplication of a complex conjugate in the frequency domain.

9. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 2, wherein said correlation product is derived from operations in the spatial domain.

10. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 2, wherein local tilt estimates for said plurality of subapertures are reconstructed to form of data representative of the aberrations of said retinal reflections incident on the subapertures.

11. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 10, wherein said data is representative of defocus, spherical aberration, coma, astigmatism in addition to other higher order aberrations of the human eye.

12. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 11, wherein said data comprises an optical path difference (OPD) array, which stores a scalar value that represents the optical path difference at each subaperture of said wavefront sensor.

13. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 11, wherein said data comprises an optical path difference (OPD) function.

14. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 13, wherein said OPD function is selected from the group of Zernike polynomials, Seidel polynomials, Hermites polynomials, Chebychev polynomials, and Legendre polynomials.

15. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 2, wherein said correlation product is derived from reference image data.

16. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 15, wherein said reference image data is based upon a collection of image data for said plurality of subapertures.

17. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 16, wherein said reference image data comprises the average subaperture image (wherein each pixel in the average subaperture image represents the average intensity value for that pixel over all of the subaperture image data).

18. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 15, wherein said reference image data is based upon image data derived from a reference source.

19. The ophthalmic instrument of claim 18, wherein said reference image data is formed by projecting a substantially non-aberrated image of said extended source onto said subapertures and capturing images formed by said subapertures in response thereto.