Financial analysis of healthcare service agreements

• US 20030055680A1
• Filed: 07/03/2002
• Published: 03/20/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 07/11/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Trintech Technologies Ltd. (Trintech Holdings Ltd.)
• Original Assignee: Trintech Technologies Ltd. (Trintech Holdings Ltd.)
• Inventors: Skeba, Cherise A.
• Application Number:
  US10/189,891
• Publication Number:
  US 20030055680A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/2
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/08 Insurance
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/70 for mining of medical data, e.g. analysing previous cases of other patients

Abstract

Rate schedules specify payment mechanisms and rates based upon which healthcare service providers are compensated for services by insurers. The invention provides a tool for predicting the total compensation under a rate schedule based upon expected levels of service utilization for a provider during a time period. Service utilization levels characteristic of the provider are supplied for a relatively small number of general classes of medical services. Aggregate utilization data that is collected from multiple service providers by government authorities provides a reliable distribution of data that is based upon a large population and that is specifically categorized using hundreds of DRG codes. The specifically categorized aggregate utilization data is scaled based upon the general utilization levels of the provider to create a predicted set of service utilization data. The rate schedule is applied to the predicted set of service utilization data to determine total compensation.

Claims

1. A method of determining a financial outcome under a provider-payer healthcare services agreement, the method comprising:

providing a first set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data;

providing a first set of specifically categorized healthcare service utilization data;

creating a second set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data based at least upon the first set of specifically categorized healthcare service utilization data;

creating a third set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data;

scaling the first set of specifically categorized healthcare service utilization data based at least upon the third set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data to produce a second set of specifically categorized healthcare service utilization data; and

applying a rate schedule to the second set of specifically categorized healthcare service utilization data to determine a financial outcome.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data is representative of utilization levels of a subject service provider for which the financial outcome is determined.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the first set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data is classified based upon greater than one and fewer than 10 classes of service.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data comprises a total billed amount for each class of service.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the first set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data comprises a total number of cases for each class of service.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data comprises a total number of days for each class of service.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the first set of specifically categorized healthcare service utilization data is based upon data collected by a governmental entity.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the first set of specifically categorized healthcare service utilization data is categorized based at least upon Diagnostic Related Groupings.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising adjusting the first set of specifically categorized healthcare service utilization data to account for inflation in utilization levels between a time when the first set of specifically categorized healthcare service utilization data is collected and a subject time period for which the financial outcome is determined.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein “

creating a third set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data based at least upon the first set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data and the second set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data”

comprises;

determining a first distribution of healthcare service utilization data among a plurality of classes of service based at least upon the first set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data;

determining a second distribution of healthcare service utilization data among a plurality of classes of service based at least upon the second set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data;

providing a first set of total levels of utilization; and

creating the third set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data based at least upon the first distribution, the second distribution, and the set of total levels of utilization.

11. A method of determining a financial outcome under a provider-payer healthcare services agreement, the method comprising:

providing a first set of healthcare service utilization data;

providing a second set of healthcare service utilization data;

scaling the second set of healthcare service utilization data based at least upon the first set of service utilization data to produce a third set of service utilization data; and

applying a rate schedule to the third set of healthcare service utilization data to determine a financial outcome.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the first set of healthcare service utilization data is representative of utilization levels of a subject service provider for which the financial outcome is determined.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein the second set of healthcare service utilization data is based upon data collected by a governmental entity.

14. The method of claim 11, wherein “

providing a first set of healthcare service utilization data”

comprises;

providing a first distribution of healthcare service utilization data among a plurality of classes of service;

providing a second distribution of healthcare service utilization data among the plurality of classes of service;

providing a first set of total levels of utilization; and

creating the first set of healthcare service utilization data based at least upon the first distribution, the second distribution, and the set of total levels of utilization.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the first distribution is based at least upon utilization levels in a set of generally classified healthcare service utilization data.

16. The method of claim 14, wherein the second distribution is based at least upon utilization levels in the second set of healthcare service utilization data.

17. The method of claim 11, wherein the first set comprises total levels of utilization.

18. The method of claim 11, wherein the first set comprises levels of utilization for a plurality of general classes of healthcare services.

19. A method of determining a financial outcome under a provider-payer healthcare services agreement, the method comprising:

creating a set of aggregate healthcare service utilization data based at least upon encounter-level data obtained from a governmental entity;

scaling the set of aggregate healthcare service utilization data to obtain a set of predictive healthcare service utilization data; and

applying a rate schedule to the set of predictive healthcare service utilization data to determine a financial outcome.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the rate schedule specifies rates based upon DRGs and based upon levels of care.