Device for ensuring specifically optimized error handling in complex systems

• US 20030056145A1
• Filed: 09/18/2001
• Published: 03/20/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 09/18/2000
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Siemens AG
• Original Assignee: Siemens AG
• Inventors: Kuth, Rainer
• Application Number:
  US09/954,165
• Publication Number:
  US 20030056145A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 714/21
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/0748 in a remote unit communicating with a single-box computer node experiencing an error/fault remote testing G06F11/2294
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/0793 Remedial or corrective actions recovery from an exception in an instruction pipeline G06F9/3861; by retry G06F11/1402; for recovering from a failure of a protocol instance or entity H04L69/40

Abstract

A device for ensuring specifically optimized error handling in complex systems, in particular in computer-supported medical diagnostic systems, characterized by a system-end storage and evaluation device (local error handler) having an error evaluation program which handles and stores local error messages and application programs according to specific rules, for automatically determining of when it is necessary to make contact with the server of a maintenance center, an update of the error software being carried out in the local error handler, when necessary, after a message has been checked.

Claims

1. A device for ensuring specifically optimized error handling in complex systems, in particular in computer-supported medical diagnostic systems, characterized by a system-end storage and evaluation device (local error handler) having an error evaluation program which handles and stores local error messages and application problems according to specific rules, for automatically determining of when it is necessary to make contact with the server of a maintenance center, an update of the error software being carried out in the local error handler, when necessary, after a message has been checked.

2. The device as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the local error handler is connected to the central server via the Internet or via a modem switched circuit.

3. The device as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the local error handler automatically interrogates the error protocols in the system for new messages at predefinable time intervals and evaluates said new messages both individually and in terms of their time sequence and frequency.

4. The device as claimed in one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the local error messages also comprise automatic checks of quality and quantity of the output system, for example the signal-to-noise ratio, the measuring times, the number of repeated measurements or the dead times when patients are changed.

5. The device as claimed in one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the central server has an error assessment device which is connected to a QS system manager which, if necessary, automatically brings about maintenance work on the system.