Distributed decision processing system for multiple participants having different roles

• US 20030069870A1
• Filed: 06/29/2001
• Published: 04/10/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 06/29/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Decide WISE International BV
• Original Assignee: Decide WISE International BV
• Inventors: Ras, Paul Coronelis Meindert, Steffes, Joep Josef Dirk
• Application Number:
  US09/895,854
• Publication Number:
  US 20030069870A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 706/54
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

A method and system for collaborative decision making based on the identification of certain individuals involved. A computer system receives via a data network alternative choices, criteria by which the set of alternative choices may be evaluated, a set of weights indicating importance of criteria and evaluations corresponding to possible attributes of criteria. A relative analysis of the alternative choices is provided based on the set of evaluations, the set of weights and the identification of the individuals. Identifiers are used to distinguish assessors, and the assessments of assessors are treated differently depending on the identifier.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

receiving, in a computer system, a set of alternative choices, the alternative choices provided by a first set of individuals including at least one individual;

receiving, in the computer system, a set of criteria by which the set of alternative choices may be evaluated, the criteria provided by a second set of individuals including at least one individual;

receiving, in the computer system via a data network coupled to the computer system, a set of weights sent to the computer system by a third set of individuals via the computer network, each weight indicating importance of a respective criterion from the set of criteria, the third set of individuals comprising at least one individual;

receiving, in the computer system via the data network, a set of evaluations sent to the computer system by a forth set of individuals, each evaluation corresponding to possible attributes of the respective criteria, the forth set of individuals comprising at least one individual;

requiring membership of individuals in the respective sets of individuals before accepting their respective input; and

based on the set of evaluations and the set of weights, providing a relative analysis of the alternative choices.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising requiring a security identification that individuals are members of the respective sets of individuals before accepting their respective input.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the security identification comprises a password.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the relative analysis of the alternative choices comprises ranking the alternatives based on a score derived from a weighted combination of evaluations, the weighted combination of the evaluations being based on the weights.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the impact of particular evaluations from the set of evaluations on the relative analysis of the alternative choices depends on the identity of the corresponding individuals in the fourth set of individuals.

6. The method of claim 1, including providing a summary of the input of various individuals.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the providing a relative analysis of the alternative choices comprises identifying at least one alternative choice from the set of alternative choices based on at least one stop condition.

8. The method of claim 1, including performing a sensitivity analysis.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising receiving, accessing and using a previously stored evaluation of at least one alternative.

10. The method of claim 1 further comprising receiving, accessing and using a previously stored weight of a criterion.

11. A computer system comprising:

a processing device;

an interface to a data network coupled to the processing device;

logic operable with the processing device that;

receives a set of alternative choices, the alternative choices provided by a first set of individuals including at least one individual;

receives a set of criteria by which the set of alternative choices may be evaluated, the criteria provided by a second set of individuals including at least one individual;

receives via the data network coupled to the computer system, a set of weights sent to the computer system by a third set of individuals via the computer network, each weight indicating importance of a respective criterion from the set of criteria, the third set of individuals comprising at least one individual;

receives via the data network, a set of evaluations sent to the computer system by a forth set of individuals, each evaluation corresponding to possible attributes of the respective criteria, the forth set of individuals comprising at least one individual;

requires membership of individuals in the respective sets of individuals before accepting their respective input; and

based on the set of evaluations and the set of weights, provides a relative analysis of the alternative choices.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein the logic comprises computer software.

13. The system of claim 11, wherein the logic comprises electronic hardware.

14. A method comprising:

receiving, in a computer system, a set of alternative choices;

receiving, in the computer system, a set of criteria by which the set of alternative choices may be evaluated;

receiving, in the computer system via a data network coupled to the computer system, a set of assessments sent to the computer system by a set of individuals via the computer network, each assessment corresponding to a respective criterion from the set of criteria;

assigning different identifications to more than one individual from among the set of individuals; and

based on the assessments and the identifications of the individuals, providing a relative analysis of the alternative choices.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the assessments comprise weights, each weight indicating importance of a respective criterion from set of criteria.

16. The method of claim 14, wherein the assessments comprise evaluations, each evaluation corresponding to possible attributes of the respective criteria.

17. The method of claim 14, wherein identifiers indicate whether an individual is a specialist, and the method further comprises providing a stronger treatment for the assessment of a specialist in a field corresponding to the respective criterion, based on the identifier of the specialist.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein at least a possible identifier is an identifier of a financial specialist and the method further comprises providing a stronger treatment of the assessment of a financial criterion, depending on the identifier of the specialist being the identifier of a financial specialist.

19. The method of claim 17, wherein at least a possible identifier is an identifier of a technical specialist and the method further comprises providing a stronger treatment of the assessment of a technical criterion, depending on the identifier of the specialist being the identifier of a technical specialist.

20. A computer system comprising:

a processing device;

an interface to a data network coupled to the processing device;

logic operable with the processing device that;

receives a set of alternative choices;

receives a set of criteria by which the set of alternative choices may be evaluated;

receives via a data network coupled to the computer system, a set of assessments sent to the computer system by a set of individuals via the computer network, each assessment corresponding to a respective criterion from the set of criteria;

assigns different identifications to more than one individual from among the set of individuals; and

based on the assessments and the identifications of the individuals, provides a relative analysis of the alternative choices.

21. A method comprising:

receiving, in a computer system, a set of alternative choices;

receiving, in the computer system, a set of criteria by which the set of alternative choices may be evaluated;

receiving, in the computer system via a data network coupled to the computer system, a set of assessments sent to the computer system by a set of individuals including at least one individual, via the computer network, the assessments comprising a set of weights and a set of evaluations, the assessments corresponding to respective criteria from the set of criteria, the assessments including pairwise comparison;

based on the identity of the individuals from the set of individuals, providing a solution that avoids iterative computations; and

based on the solution, providing a relative analysis of the alternative choices.