Method and apparatus for the selection of a service provider

• US 20030078800A1
• Filed: 09/20/2002
• Published: 04/24/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 09/21/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (HP Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (HP Inc.)
• Inventors: Salle, Mathias Jean Rene, Baldwin, Adrian
• Application Number:
  US10/251,264
• Publication Number:
  US 20030078800A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0283 Price estimation or determination

Abstract

The invention concerns method and apparatus for the selection of a service provider for providing a service to a system—for instance, for selecting a telecommunciations service provider. The apparatus comprises a system monitor 20, a data gathering system 30 and an analysis engine 50. The system monitor 20 is arranged to monitor and store data concerning system usage, to capture parameters relating such usage and store them in a data store 22. The data gathering system 30 gathers data relating to costs of service provision and contract terms associated with such provision from potential service providers. The analysis engine 50 comprises a controller 52 and a database 54. The database 54 contains details of contract terms associated with service provision that are potentially acceptable to the user and those which are not acceptable. The analysis engine 50 is arranged to calculate costs to the user of utilising the various potential service providers, by performing cost calculations based on the system usage data and the data gathered from the service providers and to select the service provider who is deemed to provide the best value.

Claims

1. A method for the selection of one amongst a plurality of potential service suppliers for the supply of a particular service, the method comprising the steps of, in an on-line environment:

(1) assessing a users likely desired use of the service;

(2) determining the number of available service providers having terms of service provision which are potentially acceptable to a user;

(3) determining the anticipated cost to the user of switching service from an existing service provider to obtain service from a new service provider; and

(4) selecting a best value service provider.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein where the user is already being provided with the service by an existing service provider, step (1) comprises the following sub-steps:

(1)(I) logging data relating to the users use of the service over time; and

(1)(II) maintaining cost records of actual costs incurred over time under arrangements with the exisiting service provider.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein Step (2) comprises analysing contract terms of the available service providers and determining whether such terms would be potentially acceptable to the user.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein Step (2) comprises the sub-steps of:

(2)(I) maintaining a database of potentially user acceptable contract terms and of definitely not acceptable contract terms;

(2)(II) comparing contract terms of the available service providers with the contract terms in the database; and

(2)(III) where a contract contains any terms not present within the database;

further considering such unknown terms to check or deduce whether such terms are potentially acceptable or definitely not acceptable and updating the database to include such terms.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein where a contract term is found that is not acceptable to a user during step 2(II) or 2(III), then the potential service provider may either be eliminated from consideration during further method steps or a negotiation procedure may be initiated.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein step (3) comprises:

(3)(I) storing billing terms of available service providers; and

(3)(II) on the basis of stored usage information and the billing terms calculating the likely cost to a user of utilising each available service provider.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein step (4) comprises comparing a cost of obtaining service from an existing supplier to the likely costs of obtaining service from the available service providers and selecting the best value service provider.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the method comprises the step (5) of recommending the best value service provider to the user.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein in a step (5) the best value service provider is automatically contacted to negotiate service provision.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein a step (6) comprises commencing service with the selected service provider.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein step (6) comprises a sub-step of configuring a system of the user to comply with the selected service provider requirements and a sub-step of electronically complying with contractual requirements of the selected service provider.

12. A method for the selection of one amongst a plurality of potential service suppliers for the supply of a particular service, the method comprising the steps of, in an on-line environment:

(1) assessing a users likely desired use of the service;

(2) determining the number of service providers which are potentially acceptable to the user by interrogating databases held by service providers to search such databases for costs of service provision and associated contractual terms of service provision;

(3) determining amongst the set of service providers identified in step (2), which service providers are potentially able to supply the service to the user at an acceptable cost and under acceptable contract terms; and

(4) selecting a best value service provider.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein where the user is already being provided with the service by an existing service provider, step (1) comprises the following sub-steps:

(1)(I) logging data relating to the users use of the service over time; and

(1)(II) maintaining cost records of actual costs incurred over time under arrangements with the exisiting service provider.

14. The method of claim 12, wherein Step (2) comprises analysing contract terms of the available service providers and determining whether such terms would be potentially acceptable to the user.

15. The method of claim 12, wherein Step (2) comprises the sub-steps of:

(2)(I) maintaining a database of potentially user acceptable contract terms and of definitely not acceptable contract terms;

(2)(II) comparing contract terms of the available service providers with the contract terms in the database; and

(2)(III) where a contract contains any terms not present within the database;

further considering such unknown terms to check or deduce whether such terms are potentially acceptable or definitely not acceptable and updating the database to include such terms.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein where a contract term is found that is not acceptable to a user during step 2(II) or 2(III), then the potential service provider may either be eliminated from consideration during further method steps or a negotiation procedure may be initiated.

17. The method of claim 12, wherein step (3) comprises:

(3)(I) storing billing terms of available service providers; and

(3)(II) on the basis of stored usage information and the billing terms calculating the likely cost to a user of utilising each available service provider.

18. The method of claim 12, wherein step (4) comprises comparing a cost of obtaining service from an existing supplier to the likely costs of obtaining service from the available service providers and selecting the best value service provider.

19. The method of claim 12, wherein the method comprises the step (5) of recommending the best value service provider to the user.

20. The method of claim 12, wherein in a step (5) the best value service provider is automatically contacted to negotiate service provision.

21. The method of claim 19, wherein a step (6) comprises commencing service with the selected service provider.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein step (6) comprises a sub-step of configuring a system of the user to comply with the selected service provider requirements and a sub-step of electronically complying with contractual requirements of the selected service provider.

23. A method for the selection of one amongst a plurality of potential service suppliers for the on-going supply of a particular service under contract, the method comprising the steps of, in an on-line environment:

(1) assessing a users likely desired use of the service over a particular period, on the basis of historical usage data;

(2) determining the number of available service providers having terms of service provision which are potentially acceptable to a user;

(3) determining the anticipated cost to the user of continuing to receive service provision from an existing service provider as well as anticipated costs to the user of switching service from the existing service provider to obtain service and receive continued service from a new service provider; and

(4) selecting a best value service provider.

24. The method of claim 23, wherein where the user is already being provided with the service by an existing service provider, step (1) comprises the following sub-steps:

(1)(I) logging data relating to the users use of the service over time; and

(1)(II) maintaining cost records of actual costs incurred over time under arrangements with the exisiting service provider.

25. The method of claim 23, wherein Step (2) comprises analysing contract terms of the available service providers and determining whether such terms would be potentially acceptable to the user.

26. The method of claim 23, wherein Step (2) comprises the sub-steps of:

(2)(I) maintaining a database of potentially user acceptable contract terms and of definitely not acceptable contract terms;

(2)(II) comparing contract terms of the available service providers with the contract terms in the database; and

(2)(III) where a contract contains any terms not present within the database;

further considering such unknown terms to check or deduce whether such terms are potentially acceptable or definitely not acceptable and updating the database to include such terms.

27. The method of claim 23, wherein where a contract term is found that is not acceptable to a user during step 2(II) or 2(III), then the potential service provider may either be eliminated from consideration during further method steps or a negotiation procedure may be initiated.

28. The method of claim 23, wherein step (3) comprises:

(3)(I) storing billing terms of available service providers; and

(3)(II) on the basis of stored usage information and the billing terms calculating the likely cost to a user of utilising each available service provider.

29. The method of claim 23, wherein step (4) comprises comparing a cost of obtaining service from an existing supplier to the likely costs of obtaining service from the available service providers and selecting the best value service provider.

30. The method of claim 23, wherein the method comprises the step (5) of recommending the best value service provider to the user.

31. The method of claim 23, wherein in a step (5) the best value service provider is automatically contacted to negotiate service provision.

32. The method of claim 30, wherein a step (6) comprises commencing service with the selected service provider.

33. The method of claim 32, wherein step (6) comprises a sub-step of configuring a system of the user to comply with the selected service provider requirements and a sub-step of electronically complying with contractual requirements of the selected service provider.

34. A method for the selection of one amongst a plurality of potential service suppliers for the supply of a particular service, the method comprising the steps of, in an on-line environment:

(1) assessing a users likely desired use of the service;

(2) maintaining a user database of potentially user acceptable contract terms and of definitely not acceptable contract terms, interrogating available service provider databases to determine service provision costs and associated contract terms, comparing contract terms of the available service providers with the contract terms in the database;

(3) for service providers having potentially acceptable contract terms for supply of the service, determining the anticipated cost to the user of obtaining service from such service providers; and

(4) selecting a best value service provider.

35. The method of claim 34, wherein where the user is already being provided with the service by an existing service provider, step (1) comprises the following sub-steps:

(1)(I) logging data relating to the users use of the service over time; and

(1)(II) maintaining cost records of actual costs incurred over time under arrangements with the exisiting service provider.

36. The method of claim 34, wherein Step (2) further comprises and the step of, where a contract contains any terms not present within the user database:

further considering such unknown terms to check or deduce whether such terms are potentially acceptable or definitely not acceptable and updating the database to include such terms.

37. The method of claim 36, wherein where a contract term is found that is not acceptable to a user, then the potential service provider may either be eliminated from consideration during further method steps or a negotiation procedure may be initiated.

38. The method of claim 34, wherein step (3) comprises:

(3)(I) storing billing terms of available service providers; and

(3)(II) on the basis of stored usage information and the billing terms calculating the likely cost to a user of utilising each available service provider.

39. The method of claim 34, wherein step (4) comprises comparing a cost of obtaining service from an existing supplier to the likely costs of obtaining service from the available service providers and selecting the best value service provider.

40. The method of claim 34, wherein the method comprises the step (5) of recommending the best value service provider to the user.

41. The method of claim 34, wherein in a step (5) the best value service provider is automatically contacted to negotiate service provision.

42. The method of claim 40, wherein a step (6) comprises commencing service with the selected service provider.

43. The method of claim 42, wherein step (6) comprises a sub-step of configuring a system of the user to comply with the selected service provider requirements and a sub-step of electronically complying with contractual requirements of the selected service provider.

44. An apparatus for the selection of a service provider for providing a service to a system, the apparatus comprising:

a system monitor arranged to monitor and store data concerning system usage, the system monitor arranged to capture parameters relating to system usage and a data store arranged to store usage data;

a data gathering system arranged to gather data relating to costs of service provision and contract terms associated with such provision from potential service providers; and

an analysis engine comprising a controller and a database containing details of contract terms associated with service provision that are potentially acceptable to the user and those which are not acceptable, the analysis engine being arranged to calculate costs to the user of utilising the various potential service providers, by performing cost calculations based on the system usage data and the data gathered from the service providers and to select the service provider who is deemed to provide the best value.

45. The apparatus of claim 44, wherein the data gathering system comprises remote access means for connecting to a network and seeking details of potential service providers.

46. The apparatus of claim 44, wherein the analysis engine is arranged to compare gathered details relating to contract terms and compare the gathered details to the potentially acceptable and not acceptable contract terms stored in the database.

47. The apparatus of claim 44, wherein the analysis engine is arranged to compare billing costs associated with service providers and select a best value service provider.