Warranty method and system

• US 20030105646A1
• Filed: 09/20/2002
• Published: 06/05/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 09/20/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Steven B. Siepser
• Original Assignee: Steven B. Siepser
• Inventors: Siepser, Steven B.
• Application Number:
  US10/247,945
• Publication Number:
  US 20030105646A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/012 Providing warranty services
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/08 Insurance
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 99/00 Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 20/40 relating to mechanical, radiation or invasive therapies, e.g. surgery, laser therapy, dialysis or acupuncture

Abstract

The present invention compensates loss resulting from unexpected outcome of service or unanticipated product performance. A consumer is provided an option to purchase a warranty prior to or during product purchase or service engagement, the warranty offering pre-determined levels of award calculated from a probabilistic, multi-variable process. Each level of award is associated with a warranty purchase price and a degree of variation of actual outcome from expected outcome. For medical services, variables could include age and gender of the patient, skill level and history of the doctor, quality of the hospital, difficulty of the procedure, type of medical equipment used, prior condition of the patient, geographic location and patient profile. The warranty could require the physician to provide additional medical or surgical care, without charge, to optimize actual outcome prior to granting an award.

Claims

1. A method for compensating loss resulting from unexpected outcome of service or unanticipated product performance, comprising the steps of:

a. providing an option to purchase a warranty prior to or during product purchase or service engagement, the warranty compensating loss resulting from the respective service provided or product purchased;

b. offering various, pre-determined levels of award with the warranty, each level of award associated with a degree of loss, wherein a warranty purchase creates a warranty event;

c. determining the degree of loss associated with the warranty event; and

d. providing the level of award associated with the determined degree of loss.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the level of award is derived from at least one factor.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the level of award results from a probabilistic, multi-variable process.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the degree of loss is based on measurable outcome expectations.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the measurable outcome expectations are incrementally scaled and the degree of loss is based on a degree of variation of actual outcome from expected outcome.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein an independent advisory board determines the degree of loss.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein a warrantee has an option to void the warranty after the degree of loss is determined, forfeit the award and pursue other methods of recovery.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein a warrantee has an option to void the warranty after the warranty is purchased and pursue other methods of recovery.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the respective service provided involves a medical procedure or surgical event.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the level of award results from a probabilistic, multi-variable process.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the variables are selected from the group consisting of patient age, patient gender, skill level and history of the doctor, quality of the hospital, type of medical equipment used, difficulty of the procedure, prior condition of the patient, patient profile, geographic location and warranty cost.

12. The method of claim 5, wherein the respective service provided involves a medical procedure or surgical event.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the patient agrees to receive corrective treatment to optimize the actual outcome before the degree of loss is determined.

14. The method of claim 12, wherein physician participation requires compliance with certain restrictions.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the restrictions are selected from the group consisting of executing a participation agreement binding the physician to certain contractual provisions, achieving certain credentials, satisfying certain eligibility requirements, establishing and maintaining certain quality criteria and achieving a specific level of demonstrated competence.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the respective service provided is lasik eye surgery.

17. A method providing award for unexpected medical outcomes, comprising the steps of:

a. providing an option to purchase a warranty prior to or during engagement of medical treatment, the warranty providing award for unexpected outcome;

b. offering various, pre-determined levels of award with the warranty, each level of award associated with a degree of loss, the degree of loss based on a degree of variation of actual outcome from expected outcome, wherein a warranty purchase creates a warranty event;

c. determining the degree of loss associated with the warranty event; and

d. providing the level of award associated with the determined degree of loss.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the level of award results from a probabilistic, multi-variable process.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the variables are selected from the group consisting of patient age, patient gender, skill level and history of the doctor, quality of the hospital, type of medical equipment used, difficulty of the procedure, prior condition of the patient, patient profile, geographic location and warranty cost.

20. The method of claim 17, wherein the patient agrees to receive corrective treatment to optimize the actual outcome before the degree of loss is determined.

21. A method for implementing a warranty program to compensate patients of lasik eye surgery that attain less than expected post-treatment visual capability, comprising the steps of:

a. providing an option to purchase a warranty prior to undergoing lasik eye surgery, the warranty providing award for less than expected post-treatment visual capability;

b. offering various, pre-determined levels of award with the warranty, each level of award associated with post-treatment visual capability, whereby a warranty purchase initiates warranty coverage and award applicability;

c. determining post-treatment visual capability; and

d. providing the level of award associated with the post-treatment visual capability.

22. The method of claim 21, further comprising the step of patient screening, wherein the patient is interviewed and patient data is evaluated for warranty program qualification.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein the patient data used to evaluate whether a patient qualifies for the warranty program includes negative testing to conditions selected from the group consisting of auto-immune disease, diabetes, unstable refractions, change in cylinder over 1.00 D, Axis 15, previous history of dry eye, irregular astigmatism, keratoconus, pregnancy, herpes, uncontrolled glaucoma and BCVA of 20/30 or worse.

24. The method of claim 21, wherein each level of award is also associated with a pre-determined warranty cost.

25. The method of claim 21, wherein a level of award is associated with post-treatment visual capability of one eye or both eyes selected from the group consisting of irreversible loss of vision, loss of the eye, BCVA of 20/50 or worse, BCVA or 20/100 or worse, BCVA or 20/200 or worse and BCBV of 20/50 or worse.

26. The method of claim 21, wherein post-treatment visual capability is determined by wavefront analysis.

27. The method of claim 21, wherein a level of award is associated with post-treatment visual capability directed to reduced night vision and glare complications.

28. The method of claim 27, wherein post-treatment visual capability is determined using a Glarometer.

29. The method of claim 21, wherein providers of the lasik eye surgery must meet or exceed certain qualifications to participate in the warranty program.

30. The method of claim 29, wherein the certain qualifications are selected from the group consisting of provider execution of a participation agreement binding the provider to certain contractual provisions and technical criteria, achieving certain credentials, satisfying certain eligibility requirements, establishing and maintaining certain quality criteria and achieving a specific level of demonstrated competence.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein satisfying certain eligibility requirements includes performing a minimum of 500 Lasik surgeries per year and having performed a minimum of 1,000 Lasik surgeries to date.

32. The method of claim 30, wherein the technical criteria is selected from the group consisting of use of an approved Microkeratome, use of an approved Laser, use of a VISX 3 Scanning Laser, use of Autonomous LADAR Vision, use of Technolas 217, Bausch and Lomb (myopia −

1.0-−

7.0 D), use of an automated pupillometer, no use of a “

roll on, roll off”

Laser, no use of a mobile Laser, requirement that the patient'"'"'s residual bed is greater than 250 microns, requirement that the patient'"'"'s pupils are under 7 mm (dim light), no patients with myopes greater than −

10.00 D, no patients with hyperopes greater than +4.00 D, no patients with cylinders greater than 4.00 D, no enhancements done less than 6 months from a previous surgery, no patients with keratometry greater than 48 D and no patients with keratometry less than 39 D.

33. The method of claim 21, further comprising, between steps (c) and (d), the step of determining whether further treatment or corrective surgery could improve post-treatment visual capability and performing further treatment or corrective surgery to optimize post-treatment visual capability before providing an award.

34. A method providing award for unexpected outcomes resulting from product use, comprising the steps of:

a. providing an option to purchase a warranty prior to or during product purchase, the warranty providing award for unexpected outcome;

b. offering various, pre-determined levels of award with the warranty, each level of award associated with a degree of loss, the degree of loss based on a degree of variation of actual outcome from expected outcome, wherein a warranty purchase creates a warranty event;

c. determining the degree of loss associated with the warranty event; and

d. providing the level of award associated with the determined degree of loss.

35. A computer-readable medium that configures a computer system to perform a method for compensating loss resulting from unexpected outcome of service or unanticipated product performance, the method comprising the steps of:

a. providing an option to purchase a warranty prior to or during product purchase or service engagement, the warranty compensating loss resulting from the respective service provided or product purchased;

b. offering various, pre-determined levels of award with the warranty, each level of award associated with a degree of loss, wherein a warranty purchase creates a warranty event;

c. determining the degree of loss associated with the warranty event; and

d. providing the level of award associated with the determined degree of loss.

36. A computer-readable medium that configures a computer system to perform a method for providing award for unexpected medical outcomes, the method comprising the steps of:

a. providing an option to purchase a warranty prior to or during engagement of medical treatment, the warranty providing award for unexpected outcome;

b. offering various, pre-determined levels of award with the warranty, each level of award associated with a degree of loss, the degree of loss based on a degree of variation of actual outcome from expected outcome, wherein a warranty purchase creates a warranty event;

c. determining the degree of loss associated with the warranty event; and

d. providing the level of award associated with the determined degree of loss.

37. A computer-readable medium that configures a computer system to perform a method for compensating patients of lasik eye surgery that attain less than expected post-treatment visual capability, the method comprising the steps of:

a. providing an option to purchase a warranty prior to undergoing lasik eye surgery, the warranty providing award for less than expected post-treatment visual capability;

b. offering various, pre-determined levels of award with the warranty, each level of award associated with post-treatment visual capability, wherein warranty purchase initiates warranty coverage and award applicability;

c. determining post-treatment visual capability; and

d. providing the level of award associated with the post-treatment visual capability.

38. A computer-readable medium that configures a computer system to perform a method for providing award for unexpected outcomes resulting from product use, the method comprising the steps of:

a. providing an option to purchase a warranty prior to or during product purchase, the warranty providing award for unexpected outcome;

b. offering various, pre-determined levels of award with the warranty, each level of award associated with a degree of loss, the degree of loss based on a degree of variation of actual outcome from expected outcome, wherein a warranty purchase creates a warranty event;

c. determining the degree of loss associated with the warranty event; and

d. providing the level of award associated with the determined degree of loss.

39. A computer-readable medium that stores a program for compensating loss resulting from unexpected outcome of service or unanticipated product performance, the program comprising:

a. means for providing an option to purchase a warranty prior to or during product purchase or service engagement, the warranty compensating loss resulting from the respective service provided or product purchased;

b. means for offering various, pre-determined levels of award with the warranty, each level of award associated with a degree of loss, wherein a warranty purchase creates a warranty event;

c. means for determining the degree of loss associated with the warranty event; and

d. means for providing the level of award associated with the determined degree of loss.

40. A computer-readable medium that stores a program for providing award for unexpected medical outcomes, comprising:

a. means for providing an option to purchase a warranty prior to or during engagement of medical treatment, the warranty providing award for unexpected outcome;

b. means for offering various, pre-determined levels of award with the warranty, each level of award associated with a degree of loss, the degree of loss based on a degree of variation of actual outcome from expected outcome, wherein a warranty purchase creates a warranty event;

c. means for determining the degree of loss associated with the warranty event; and

d. means for providing the level of award associated with the determined degree of loss.

41. A computer-readable medium that stores a program for implementing a warranty program to compensate patients of lasik eye surgery that attain less than expected post-treatment visual capability, comprising:

a. means for providing an option to purchase a warranty prior to undergoing lasik eye surgery, the warranty providing award for less than expected post-treatment visual capability;

b. means for offering various, pre-determined levels of award with the warranty, each level of award associated with post-treatment visual capability, whereby a warranty purchase initiates warranty coverage and award applicability;

c. means for determining post-treatment visual capability; and

d. means for providing the level of award associated with the post-treatment visual capability.

42. A computer-readable medium that stores a program for providing award for unexpected outcomes resulting from product use, comprising:

a. means for providing an option to purchase a warranty prior to or during product purchase, the warranty providing award for unexpected outcome;

b. means for offering various, pre-determined levels of award with the warranty, each level of award associated with a degree of loss, the degree of loss based on a degree of variation of actual outcome from expected outcome, wherein a warranty purchase creates a warranty event;

c. means for determining the degree of loss associated with the warranty event; and

d. means for providing the level of award associated with the determined degree of loss.