Supervising the processing status of activities within workflow management systems

• US 20030144891A1
• Filed: 01/23/2003
• Published: 07/31/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 01/26/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Leymann, Frank, Roller, Dieter
• Application Number:
  US10/349,676
• Publication Number:
  US 20030144891A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063 Operations research, analysis or management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0633 Workflow analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

In a method for supervising the processing status of activities of a business process managed by a Workflow-Management-Systems or a computer system with comparable functionality (WFMS), the activity is checked to determine whether the processing status of the activity instance has an in doubt status. If an in doubt status is found, a check is made to determine whether a dedicated check-activity is associated with the activity, a check-activity being capable of dynamically analyzing the processing status of its associated activity. If a dedicated check-activity is found, an instance is launched to determine the processing status of the activity instance.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for automatically supervising activity instances within a WorkFlow Management System (WFMS), said WFMS administering at least one process instance comprising an activity instance, said method comprising the steps of:

a) determining whether the processing status of the activity instance is in doubt;

b) responding to a determination indicates the status is in doubt, determining whether a dedicated check-activity implementation is associated with the activity, said check-activity implementation being capable of analyzing the processing status of the associated activity; and

c) when a dedicated check-activity implementation is determined to be associated with the activity, launching an instance of the dedicated check-activity implementation to determine the processing status of the activity instance.

2. A computer-implemented method according to claim 1 wherein each dedicated check-activity is specifically tailored to its associated activity for determining the processing status.

3. A computer-implemented method according to claim 2 where a processing status is defined as being in doubt when WFMS is being restarted following a crash of WFMS or an underlying infrastructure component or when an activity instance exceeds a predefined time-out value without termination of the activity.

4. A computer-implemented method according to claim 2 where, when a dedicated check-activity implementation is determined to be associated with the activity, further determining whether a limit exists for the number of times the check-activity implementation can be executed and, if so, proceeding with execution of the check-activity implementation only if that limit has not been reached.

5. A computer-implemented method according to claim 3 including the added steps of responding to a dedicated check-activity determination that the activity instance was completed by:

a) constructing an output container of the activity instance within the WFMS;

b) setting the activity instance to a completed state; and

c) causing the WFMS to continue navigation within the process instance.

6. A computer-implemented method according to claim 3 including the added steps of responding to a dedicated check-activity determination that the activity instance has failed by:

a) setting the activity instance to an in-error state; and

b) causing the WFMS to perform error processing for the activity instance.

7. A computer-implemented method according to claim 3 including the added steps of responding to a dedicated check-activity determination that the activity instance has neither completed successfully, failed, or entered a running state by:

a) setting the activity instance to a running state; and

b) launching execution of the activity instance.

8. A WorkFlow Management System for automatically supervising activity, said System administering at least one process instance comprising an activity instance and comprising:

a) logic for determining whether the processing status of the activity instance is in doubt;

b) logic responsive to a determination that the status is in doubt for determining whether a dedicated check-activity implementation is associated with the activity, said check-activity implementation being capable of analyzing the processing status of the associated activity; and

c) logic responsive to a determination that a dedicated check-activity implementation is associated with the activity for launching an instance of the dedicated check-activity implementation to determine the processing status of the activity instance.

9. A data processing program for execution in a data processing system comprising software code for performing a method of automatically supervising activity instances within a WorkFlow Management System (WFMS), said WFMS administering at least one process instance comprising an activity instance, said method comprising the steps of:

a) determining whether the processing status of the activity instance is in doubt;

b) when the determination indicates the status is in doubt, determining whether a dedicated check-activity implementation is associated with the activity, said check-activity implementation being capable of analyzing the processing status of the associated activity; and

c) when a dedicated check-activity implementation is determined to be associated with the activity, launching an instance of the dedicated check-activity implementation to determine the processing status of the activity instance.