Chemical cleaning backwash for normally immersed membranes

• US 20030146153A1
• Filed: 03/04/2003
• Published: 08/07/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 07/30/1999
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Zenon Technology Partnership
• Original Assignee: Zenon Technology Partnership
• Inventors: Pedersen, Steven, Cadera, Jason, Behmann, Henry, Cote, Pierre, Husain, Hidayat, Adams, Nicholas, Rabie, Hamid
• Application Number:
  US10/377,647
• Publication Number:
  US 20030146153A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 210/636
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 2321/04 Backflushing
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 2321/16 Use of chemical agents
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 2321/162 Use of acids
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 2321/164 Use of bases
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 2321/168 Use of other chemical agents
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 2321/2066 Pulsated flow
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 61/18 Apparatus therefor
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 65/02 Membrane cleaning or sterilisation ; Membrane regeneration
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 65/08 Prevention of membrane fouling or of concentration polarisation
• CPC Class Codes: C02F 1/444 by ultrafiltration or microfiltration
• CPC Class Codes: C02F 3/1273 Submerged membrane bioreactors
• CPC Class Codes: Y02W 10/10 Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage

Abstract

A method of chemically cleaning normally immersed suction driven filtering membranes involves backwashing a chemical cleaner through the membranes while the tank is empty in repeated pulses in which the chemical cleaner is pumped to the membranes separated by waiting periods in which chemical cleaner is not pumped to the membranes. The duration and frequency of the pulses is preferably chosen to provide an appropriate contact time of the chemical, preferably without allowing the membranes to dry between pulses and without using excessive amounts of chemical. In other aspects, such membranes preferably used for filtering water to produce potable water in a batch process are backwashed with a chemical cleaner substantially at the same time as the tank is being drained. The chemical cleaner is optionally supplied in pulses. In other aspects, chemical cleaner backwashes are started before the membranes foul significantly and are repeated at least once per week to reduce the rate of decline in the permeability of the membranes so that intensive recovery cleaning is required less frequently. When performed in situ, each cleaning event comprises (a) stopping permeation and any agitation of the membranes, (b) backwashing the membranes with a chemical cleaner in repeated pulses and (c) resuming agitation, if any, and permeation. The pulses last for between 10 seconds and 100 seconds and there is a time between pulses between 50 seconds and 6 minutes. Each cleaning event typically involves between 5 and 20 pulses.

Claims

1. A method for cleaning one or more membranes normally immersed in a water containing solids in a tank and used to produce a permeate comprising:

performing cleaning events having the steps of;

(a) stopping permeation;

(b) flowing a selected concentration of a chemical cleaner through the membranes in a direction opposite to the direction in which permeate passes through the membranes, while the membranes remain immersed in the water containing solids, in repeated pulses followed by waiting periods, the repeated pulses and waiting periods in a cleaning event cumulatively having a selected duration; and

,

(c) resuming permeation;

wherein the membranes are not agitated while the chemical cleaner is flowed through the membranes.

2. The method of claim 1 repeated at least once per week.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the product of the concentration of the chemical cleaner expressed as an equivalent concentration of NaOCl in cleaning efficacy and the duration of the pulses and waiting periods in a week is between 2,000 minutes·

mg/L and 30,000 minutes·

mg/L.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the product of the concentration of the chemical cleaner expressed as an equivalent concentration of NaOCl in cleaning efficacy and the duration of the pulses and waiting periods in a week is between 2,000 minutes·

mg/L and 20,000 minutes·

mg/L.

5. The method of claim 2 wherein the water lean in solids is intended for drinking water and the product of the concentration of the chemical cleaner expressed as an equivalent concentration of NaOCl in cleaning efficacy and the duration of the pulses and waiting periods in a week is between 5,000 minutes·

mg/L and 10,000 minutes·

mg/L.

6. The method of claim 2 wherein the water rich in solids is a wastewater and the product of the concentration of the chemical cleaner expressed as an equivalent concentration of NaOCl in cleaning efficacy and the duration of the pulses and waiting periods in a week is between 10,000 minutes·

mg/L and 30,000 minutes·

mg/L.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the pulses last for between 10 seconds and 100 seconds and the waiting periods last for between 50 seconds and 6 minutes.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the pulses last for between 10 seconds and 100 seconds and the waiting periods last for between 50 seconds and 3 minutes.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the length of the pulses is selected to provide chemical cleaner in an area in and adjacent to the membranes with an initial efficacy and the length of the waiting periods is selected to provide substantially effective chemical cleaner in an area in and adjacent to the membranes during the waiting period.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the membranes are hollow fibre membranes and the pressure of the pulses is between 5 kPa and 55 kPa above the pressure on the outside of the membranes.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the flow through the membranes during the pulses is between 8.5 and 51 μ

L/m²/h/bar.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein chemical cleaner is removed from the tank as retentate before permeation is resumed.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein substantially all of the chemical cleaner removed from the tank as retentate before permeation is resumed.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein a permeate pump is used to flow the selected concentration of cleaning chemical through the membranes.

15. A method for cleaning one or more membranes immersed in water rich in solids and used to permeate a water lean in solids wherein each cleaning event comprises the steps of:

(a) stopping permeation and agitation of the water containing solids;

(b) flowing a chemical cleaner through the membranes in a direction opposite to the direction in which permeate passes through the membrane;

(c) resuming permeation; and

,

(d) resuming agitation,

and wherein permeate collected before resuming agitation is wasted or recycled to the water containing solids and wherein the membranes and the membranes remain immersed during steps (a), (b), (c) and (d).

16. A method for cleaning one or more filtering membranes normally immersed in tank water containing solids in a tank and used to produce a permeate in one or more cleaning events, each cleaning event comprising the steps of:

(a) stopping permeation;

(b) draining the tank water from the tank to below the level of the membranes; and

,

(c) flowing a chemical cleaner in pulses through the membranes in a direction opposite to the direction in which water lean in solids normally permeates through the membranes; and

,

(d) refilling the tank,

wherein,

(e) the cleaning events are performed at least once a week; and

,

(f) the product of the concentration of the chemical cleaner expressed as an equivalent concentration of NaOCl in cleaning efficacy and the duration of all cleaning events in a week is between 2,000 minutes*mg/L and 20,000 minutes*mg/L.

17. The invention of claim 16 wherein the pulses have a pressure which minimizes the relative size of local pressure variations between membranes or portions of membranes in different parts of the tank.

18. The invention of claim 16 wherein the pulses have a pressure between 10 kPa and 55 kPa.

19. The invention of claim 16 wherein the membranes are vertically oriented hollow fibres fluidly connected to at least an upper header and the chemical cleaner flows into the membranes only through the upper header.

20. The invention of claim 19 wherein the pulses have a pressure between 10 kPa and 55 kPa.

21. The invention of claim 20 wherein the flux of chemical cleaner through the membranes is between 30 and 55 L/m²/h/bar.

22. The invention of claim 16 wherein the time between pulses is insufficient to allow the membranes to dry substantially from an initial wetted state and the duration of the flow of chemical cleaner in the pulses allows the membranes to be re-wetted to the initial state.

23. The invention of claim 22 wherein in each pulse the chemical cleaner flows for between 10 seconds and 120 seconds and does not flow for between 30 seconds and five minutes.

24. The invention of claim 16 wherein the flow of chemical cleaner is provided by a pump and the speed of the pump is controlled to maintain a preselected pressure of the pulses.

25. The invention of claim 23 wherein the time during which the pump is on in each pulse is decreased if the flux of the chemical cleaner increases from an initial value.