Assessment methods and systems

• US 20030149692A1
• Filed: 01/23/2003
• Published: 08/07/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 03/20/2000
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Intelligent Assessment Technologies Limited
• Original Assignee: Intelligent Assessment Technologies Limited
• Inventors: Mitchell, Thomas Anderson
• Application Number:
  US10/239,059
• Publication Number:
  US 20030149692A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 707/4
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/3344 using natural language analysis

Abstract

An information extraction system for the electronic assessment of free-form text against a standard for such text, in which semantic-syntactic templates prepared from the standard are compared with a semantically-syntactically tagged form of the free-form text, and an output assessment is derived in accordance with the result of this comparison.

Claims

1. A method for the computer based assessment of a submitted free-form text against a standard for such text, the method including the steps of information extraction.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the steps of information extraction include the steps of:

a) Preparing a semantic syntactic template from the standard text;

b) Preparing a semantically syntactically tagged form of the submitted text;

c) Comparing the template with the tagged submitted text; and

d) Deriving an output assessment in accordance with the comparison.

3. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein steps (a) and (b) include the step of natural language processing.

4. A method according to claim 3 wherein the step of natural language processing includes the step of parsing the text into constituent parts.

5. A method according to claim 4 wherein the step of natural language processing further includes the step of lemmatising the constituent parts.

6. A method according to claim 3 or claim 4 wherein the step of natural language processing includes the step of tagging the constituent parts with semantic information.

7. A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the step of tagging includes the step of accessing a lexical database.

8. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein before step (c) there is included a further step of modifying the template using additional data.

9. A method as claimed in any one of the claims 2 to 8 wherein step (c) includes the step of pattern matching key syntactic structures of the template and the tagged submitted text.

10. A method as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the method further includes the step of processing the submitted text in a contextual spellchecker.

11. A method as claimed in any one of the claims 3 to 10 wherein the method further includes the step of pre-parse processing the submitted text prior to natural language processing.

12. A method as claimed in any one of the claims 3 to 11 wherein the method further includes the step of post-parse processing the submitted text prior to natural language processing.

13. A system for computer based assessment of a submitted free-form text against a standard for such text, the system comprising means to perform the method of any one of the claims 1 to 12.

14. A computer program comprising program instructions for causing a computer to perform the process of computer-based assessment of free-form text against a standard for such text, the method comprising steps of any one of claims 1 to 12.

15. A computer program comprising program instructions which, when loaded into a computer, constitute the processing means for computer-based assessment of free-form text against a standard for such text, the system comprising means to perform the method of any one of claims 1 to 12.

16. A method for computer-based marking of an examination script including the method of any one of claims 1 to 12 wherein the submitted free-form text is at least one answer to at least one question of the examination script from at least one examination candidate, the template is representative of mark scheme answers to the questions of the examination script and the output assessment is a grading of the candidates answers to the examination script.

17. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12, 14 or 16 wherein the method is performed in real time.

18. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12, 14, 16 or 17 wherein the method is performed over the Internet.