Methods and apparatus for financial evaluation of information technology projects

• US 20030158800A1
• Filed: 09/10/2002
• Published: 08/21/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 02/21/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Alinean, Inc. (Mediafly, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Alinean, Inc. (Mediafly, Inc.)
• Inventors: Friedlander, Michael, Pisello, Thomas, Arseneault, Stephen
• Application Number:
  US10/238,077
• Publication Number:
  US 20030158800A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/35
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/00 Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/02 Banking, e.g. interest calculation or account maintenance credit or loans G06Q40/03

Abstract

Apparatus and methods of evaluating an IT project within an organization is described herein. Evaluation of an IT project is undertaken by receiving a first set of data representative of financial information about the organization and future assumptions about the organization, receiving a second set of data representative of characteristics of the first IT project, and automatically generating a first set of indices based at least in part on the first and the second set of data.

Claims

1. A method of evaluating a first IT project within an organization comprising the steps of:

receiving a first set of data representative of financial information about the organization and future assumptions about the organization;

receiving a second set of data representative of characteristics of the first IT project; and

generating a first set of indices based at least in part on the first and the second set of data.

2. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the characteristics of the first IT project include at least one of costs of the first IT project, investments required by the first IT project, savings generated by the first IT project and strategic benefits generated by the first IT project.

3. A method as defined in claim 2 wherein the strategic benefits generated by the first IT project includes a number of intangible benefits.

4. A method defined in claim 2 further including:

displaying to the user a list of strategic benefits; and

receiving an input from the user selecting a first strategic benefit; and

associating the first strategic benefit to the first IT project.

5. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the first set of indices includes at least one of return on investment (ROI), net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), economic value added (EVA) and payback period of the first IT project.

6. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the step of receiving the second set of data comprises:

displaying to a user a first list of types of IT projects;

receiving an input from the user selecting a first type of IT project;

assigning the first type of IT project as a type of the first IT project;

displaying to the user a first set of characteristics dependent on the type of the first IT project; and

receiving a number of inputs from the user representing values of at least some of the characteristics of the first set of characteristics.

7. A method as defined in claim 6 wherein the first set of characteristics includes a risk associated with the first IT project.

8. A method as defined in claim 7 where the first set of indices is adjusted based on a value of the risk associated with the first IT project.

9. A method as defined in claim 1 further comprising estimating an impact of the first IT project on a future financial statement of the organization.

10. A method as defined in claim 1 further comprising estimating an impact of the first IT project on a strategic goal of the organization.

11. A method as defined in claim 1 further comprising estimating an impact of the first IT project on a key performance indicator of the organization.

12. A method as defined in claim 1 further comprising:

receiving a third set of data representative of characteristics of a second IT project;

displaying to a user a first list of IT projects;

receiving an input from the user selecting the first and the second IT projects;

combining the data representative of a first characteristic of the first IT project with the data representative of the first characteristic of the second IT project to get a first sum; and

automatically generating a second set of indices based at least in part on the first sum and the first set of data.

13. A method as defined in claim 1 further comprising:

receiving a third set of data representative of characteristics of a second IT project;

displaying to a user a list of IT projects;

receiving an input from the user selecting the first and the second IT projects;

calculating a second set of indices based at least in part on the first and the second set of data;

calculating a third set of indices based at least in part on the first and the third set of data; and

comparing at least some of the indices of the second set of indices with corresponding indices from the third set of indices.

14. A method as defined in claim 1 further comprising:

storing a first set of values of the first set of indices generated at a first point in time before the first IT project is implemented;

calculating a second set of values of the first set of indices at a second point in time after the first IT project is implemented; and

comparing the first set of values to the second set of values.

15. A method as defined in claim 1 further comprising:

providing a first set of assumptions regarding a future state of business conditions;

providing a second set of assumptions regarding the future state of business conditions;

generating a second set of indices based at least in part on the first set of data, the second set of data and the first set of assumptions;

generating a third set of indices based at least in part on the first set of data, the second set of data and the second set of assumptions; and

comparing at least some of the second set of indices with the corresponding indices from the third set of indices.

16. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the step of receiving the second set of data comprises:

displaying to a user a first list of the characteristics of the first IT project;

receiving a number of inputs from the user representing values of at least some of the characteristics of the first IT project;

transmitting the values of at least some of the characteristics of the first IT project over a communication network;

receiving the values of at least some of the characteristics of the first IT project; and

storing the values of at least some of the characteristics of the first IT project.

17. A method as defined in claim 16 further comprising:

transmitting at least some of the first set of indices over the communication network;

receiving at least some of the first set of indices; and

displaying at least some of the first set of indices on a user.

18. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the step of receiving the first set of data comprises of obtaining a public file from a public datasource, containing at least some of the first set of data.

19. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the step of receiving the first set of data comprises of automatically reading a worksheet specified by the user.

20. A method of evaluating a first IT project within a first organization comprising the steps of:

receiving a first set of data representative of financial information about the first organization and future assumptions about the first organization;

receiving a second set of data representative of characteristics of the first IT project;

providing a third set of data representative of past financial information and past IT expenditure of a first group of organizations;

generating a first set of indices based at least in part on the first and the second set of data;

calculating a second set of indices based at least in part on the third set of data; and

comparing at least one member of the first set of indices with a corresponding member of the second set of indices.

27. A method as defined in claim 20, further comprising calculating an estimated IT budget of the first organization based on the first set of data and the third set of data and calculating an actual IT budget of the first organization from the second set of data.

28. A method as defined in claim 27, further comprising comparing the estimated IT budget of the first organization with the actual IT budget of the first organization.

29. A method as defined in claim 28, further comprising displaying the actual IT budget of the first organization as a percentage of the estimated IT budget of the first organization.

21. A method as defined in claim 21 wherein the first set of indices and the second set of indices includes at least one of (1) IT expenditure per revenue, (2) IT expenditure per assets, (3) IT expenditure per employee, and (4) IT expenditure per information employee.

22. A method as defined in claim 21 further comprising:

displaying a first list of characteristics representative of characteristics of business organizations;

receiving a number of inputs from a user representing a first range of values of at least some of the characteristics of the first list of characteristics;

selecting a second group of organizations from the first group of organizations for which the values of the characteristics of the first group of characteristics are within the first range of values;

selecting a fourth set of data representative of past financial information and past IT expenditure of the second group of organizations;

calculating a third set of indices based at least in part on the fourth set of data; and

comparing some of the first set of indices with the corresponding third set of indices.

23. A method as defined in claim 22 wherein the first list of characteristics includes at least one of SIC code, revenue, number of employees, and primary geographic location.

24. A method as defined in claim 23 wherein the first and the third set of indices includes at least one of economic value added (EVA), information productivity, revenue per employee, EVA per employee and return on equity (ROE).

25. A method as defined in claim 23 wherein the first and the third set of indices includes at least one of IT spending per revenue, IT spending per employee, IT spending per information employee and innovation budget.

26. A method as defined in claim 23 further comprising displaying the first and the third set of indices at least in the form of a pie chart or a bar chart.

30. A project evaluation system for evaluating a first IT project within a first organization, the system comprising:

a computer processor communicating with a data entry device, wherein the data entry device is configured to receive a first set of data representative of revenues, expenses, investments and strategic goals of the first organization, and a second set of data representative of costs, savings, strategic benefits and risks related to the first IT project;

a memory;

a processing unit; and

a first software routine stored in the memory and adapted to be executed on the processing unit for calculating a first set of indices based at least in part on the first and the second set of data.

31. A project evaluation system of claim 30 further comprising a second software routine stored in the memory and adapted to be executed on the processing unit for calculating a second set of indices based on the first set of data and comparing at least one member of the first set of indices with a corresponding member of the second set of indices.

32. A project evaluation system of claim 30 wherein the data entry device comprises of a third software routine stored in the memory and adapted to be executed on the processing unit to display to a user a first list of types of IT projects, to receive an input from the user selecting a first type of IT project;

to assign the first type of IT project as a type of the first IT project, to display to the user a first set of characteristics dependent on the type of the first IT project, and to receive a number of inputs from the user representing values of at least some of the characteristics of the first set of characteristics.

33. A project evaluation system of claim 30 wherein the first set of indices includes at least one of return on investment (ROI), net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), economic value added (EVA) and payback period.

34. A computer program stored on a tangible medium to evaluate a first IT project within a first organization, the computer program comprising:

first software to receive a first set of data representative of financial information about the first organization and future assumptions about the first organization;

second software to receive a second set of data representative of characteristics of the first IT project; and

third software to generate a first set of indices based at least in part on the first and the second set of data.

35. A computer program defined in claim 34 further comprising:

fourth software to display the first set of indices in a bar chart form; and

fifth software to display the first set of indices in a pie chart form.

36. A project evaluation system for evaluating a first IT project within a first organization, the system comprising:

a computer processor communicating with a memory, wherein the memory contains a first set of data representative of the revenues, expenses, investments and strategic goals of the first organization, and a second set of data representative of the costs, savings, strategic benefits and risks related to the IT project;

a processing unit; and

a first software routine stored in the memory and adapted to be executed on the processing unit to calculate the functions of;

calculating a first set of indices based on the first set of data,

calculating a second set of indices based on the second set of data, and

comparing at least one member of the first set of indices with a corresponding member of the second set of indices.

37. A peer evaluation system for estimating IT budget within a first organization, the system comprising:

a computer processor communicating with a memory, wherein the memory contains a first set of data representative of revenues, expenses, investments and strategic goals of the first organization, and a second set of data representative of financial information and IT expenditure of a number of organizations other than the first organization;

a processing unit; and

a first software routine stored in the memory and adapted to be executed on the processing unit to calculate a first set of indices based at least in part on the first and the second set of data.

38. A system as defined in claim 37 wherein the first set of indices includes at least one of (1) IT expenditure per revenue, (2) IT expenditure per assets, (3) IT expenditure per employee, and (4) IT expenditure per information employee.

39. A project evaluation system for evaluating a first IT project within a first organization, the system comprising:

first software to display a first list of characteristics of the first IT project and a second list of characteristic of the first organization to a user;

second software to receive a first set of data from the user representing values of at least some of the characteristics of the first IT project and a second set of data from a user representing values of at least some of the characteristics of the first organization;

third software for transmitting the first and the second set of data over a communication network;

fourth software to receive the first and the second set of data; and

fifth software to calculate a first set of indices based at least in part on the first and the second set of data.

40. A system for analyzing a first IT project within a first organization, the system comprising:

means for receiving a first set of data representative of financial information about the first organization and future assumptions about the organization;

means for receiving a second set of data representative of characteristics of the first IT project; and

means for generating a first set of indices based at least in part on the first and the second set of data.

41. A system of claim 40, wherein the means for receiving the second set of data includes:

means for displaying to a user a first list of IT projects;

means for receiving an input from the user selecting the first IT project;

means for displaying to the user a first set of characteristics dependent on a type of the first IT project; and

means for receiving a number of inputs from the user representing values of at least some of the characteristics of the first set of characteristics.

42. A system for evaluating a first IT project within a first organization, the system comprising:

means for receiving a first set of data representative of financial information about the organization and future assumptions about the organization;

means for receiving a second set of data representative of characteristics of the first IT project;

means for providing a third set of data representative of past financial information and past IT expenditure of a number of organizations other than the first organization;

means for generating a first set of indices based at least in part on the first and the second set of data;

means for calculating a second set of indices based at least in part on the third set of data; and

means for comparing at least one member of the first set of indices with a corresponding member of the second set of indices.