Multiterminal publishing system and corresponding method for using same

• US 20030158894A1
• Filed: 04/11/2003
• Published: 08/21/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 05/31/2000
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Wokupi SA
• Original Assignee: Wokupi SA
• Inventors: Ziserman, Francois
• Application Number:
  US10/297,221
• Publication Number:
  US 20030158894A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/203
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/252 between a Database Management System and a front-end application
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/258 Data format conversion from or to a database
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/986 Document structures and storage, e.g. HTML extensions

Abstract

The invention concerns a multiterminal publishing system, providing access to at least an application corresponding to a service for supplying to a plurality of terminals, in accordance with at least two different types of terminals, data contained in at least a data source. The invention is characterised in that the system comprises: at least a module (30, 301, 302, 303) for creating objects from raw data; a module (31) for generating response in a generic presentation format, in response to a request (51) made by a terminal concerning a given application; a presentation module (32), for transforming said reply in a generic presentation format specific to said terminal which has made the request.

Claims

1. A multi-terminal publishing system (2), of the type offering access to at least one application corresponding to a service, making it possible to provide to a plurality of terminals (3-10), according to at least two different terminal types, information contained in at least one information source (40),

characterised in that it includes:

at least one object creation module (30, 301-303), enabling at least one function to be provided for creating objects from raw data extracted from said at least one information source and/or generated by said at least one object creation module;

a module (31) generating a response in a generic presentation format, in response to a request (51) formulated by a terminal and relating to a given application, said application being defined, within said response generation module, by a plurality of contexts and a concept of browsing among said contexts, each context including at least one action and/or at least one object, created by said at least one object creation module, said response resulting from browsing according to said concept of browsing within said plurality of contexts;

a presentation module (32), enabling said generic presentation format response to be converted into a response in a presentation format specific to the type of said terminal formulating said request.

2. A system according to claim 1, characterised in that generic presentation format response is a tree of the XML or SGML type.

3. A system according to any one of claims 1 and 2, characterised in that it additionally includes an interfacing module (59) enabling said terminal formulated request (51) to be intercepted and analysed, in such a way as to:

identify said terminal type;

create a new request (52), in a generic request format, destined for said response generation module.

4. A system according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterised in that each object includes at least one member relating to the structure of said object and at least one constructor, said at least one constructor allowing said at least one object creation module (30) to inform the content of said at least one member.

5. A system according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterised in that said at least one object creation module (30) belongs to the group including:

an object creation module (301), called a Webbike module, enabling at least one function to be provided for creating objects from raw data extracted from at least one data source containing at least one document expressed in a “

markup”

language;

an object creation module (303), enabling at least one function to be provided for creating objects from raw data extracted from at least one SQL database;

an object creation module (302), constructed from a Java language, enabling at least one function to be provided for creating objects from raw data generated by said object creation module and/or extracted from at least one pre-set information source.

6. A system according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterised in that said presentation module (32) is constructed using an XSL language.

7. A system according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterised in that within said response generation module (31), said at least one application is composed, in accordance with a first specific language, of a service container, describing said service, and of at least one context container, each corresponding to a said browsing stage.

8. A system according to claim 7, characterised in that a container is composed of at least one component, allowing at least one instruction to be brought together.

9. A system according to claim 8, characterised in that it employs six component types:

“

entry point”

components, enabling the description of a first plurality of operations which said response generation module has to carry out when launching the operation of a service container or a context container;

“

attribute”

components, enabling the description of a plurality of variables which may be used in said current container;

“

method”

components, enabling a plurality of said at least one instruction within one procedure to be brought together;

“

import”

components, enabling the description of said at least one object necessary for said response generation module, so as to generate said response to said request relating to a given application;

“

handler”

components, enabling the description of a second plurality of operations which said response generation module has to carry out in response to an action taken by a terminal;

“

content”

components, enabling the description of said information supplied to a terminal within said response and/or the description of said at least one action which said terminal may take at a given said browsing stage.

10. A system according to any one of claims 8 and 9, characterised in that it employs the four following instruction types:

“

content”

instructions, enabling the generation of a part of said response in a generic presentation format;

“

manipulation of variables”

instructions, enabling at least one variable to be declared and/or manipulated;

“

browse”

instructions, enabling the current context and/or the current application to be changed;

“

use”

instructions, able to be used by instructions and/or components.

11. A system according to claim 10, characterised in that said “

content”

instructions belong to the group including;

a “

content-literal”

instruction, enabling a string of characters of said generic format response to be described;

a “

content-object”

instruction, enabling an object to be described;

a “

content-list”

instruction, enabling a list of objects to be described;

a “

content-item”

instruction, enabling one element from a list to be described;

a “

content-member”

instruction, enabling one member of an object to be described;

a “

content-selection”

instruction, enabling one item to be selected from a list;

a “

content-multiple-selection”

instruction, enabling at least one item to be selected from a list;

a “

content-entry”

instruction, enabling the description of one “

entry”

item through which said terminal formulating said request is able to enter a value;

a “

content-action-scroll”

instruction making it possible to move around within a list;

a “

content-action”

instruction, enabling an action to be described;

a “

content-change of context-action”

instruction, enabling an action to be described which allows said terminal formulating said request to change context;

a “

content-previous context-action”

instruction, enabling said terminal formulating said request to return to the previous context.

12. A system according to claim 10, characterised in that said “

manipulation of variables”

instructions belong to the group including;

an “

object”

instruction, enabling an “

object”

variable to be declared;

a “

list”

instruction, enabling a “

list”

variable to be declared;

a “

simple”

instruction, enabling a “

simple”

variable to be declared, distinct from said “

object”

type and said “

list”

type;

a “

create”

instruction, enabling an object or a list of objects to be constructed;

a “

set up”

instruction, enabling a value to be assigned to a variable;

a “

list-move”

instruction enabling a current list pointer to be moved, specifying a movement pitch;

a “

list-move to”

instruction, enabling a current list pointer to be moved, specifying a new position for said pointer.

13. A system according to any one of claims 10 to 12, characterised in that said “

browse”

instructions belong to the group including;

a “

change-context”

instruction, enabling a new context to be instanced;

a “

change-service”

instruction, enabling a new service to be instanced;

a “

context-previous”

instruction, making it possible to return to the previous context in the current service;

a “

service-previous”

instruction, making it possible to return to the previous context with the last context of said service.

14. A system according to any one of claims 10 to 13, characterised in that said “

use”

instructions belong to the group including;

a “

call”

instruction, enabling a “

method”

component to be called up in the current context or service;

an “

if”

instruction, making it possible to set up a condition over a set of instructions;

an “

if not”

instruction, following an “

if”

instruction and enabling a condition to be set over a set of instructions;

an “

if not-if”

instruction, following an “

if”

instruction and enabling at least one other condition to be set over said set of instructions;

a “

run-content”

instruction, enabling a presentation to be generated of said information described in a “

content”

component;

an “

sidl-import”

instruction, enabling an object to be used in the current service to be specified;

a “

parameter-list”

instruction, enabling parameter declarations to be brought together;

a “

parameter”

instruction, enabling a parameter value to be specified;

a “

do”

instruction, enabling actions to be carried out when launching a context operation to be brought together in a “

handler”

component;

an “

on”

instruction, enabling conditions having to be validated in order for a “

handler”

component to operate to be brought together.

15. A system according to any one of claims 1 to 14, characterised in that on reception by said at least one object creation module (30) of a request for at least one object, said request coming from said response generation module (31), said at least one object creation function employs at least one extraction sub-function, making it possible to fill in the content of at least one member relating to the structure of said at least one object.

16. A system according to claim 15, characterised in that said at least one object creation function additionally includes one sub-function for comparison of said at least one object relating to said request with a list of previously at least partially created objects, so as to employ said at least one extraction sub-function only to create objects not previously created and/or to complete previously partially created objects.

17. A system according to any one of claims 15 and 16, characterised in that within said Webbike module (301), each extraction sub-function is composed, in accordance with a second specific language, of at least one Webbike page including at least one Webbike node, and in that said at least one Webbike page is synchronised with at least one document expressed in a “

markup”

language from at least one data source, said at least one document itself including at least one “

markup”

language node, said synchronisation enabling a Webbike node to position itself on a “

markup”

language node so as to extract from it raw data for the purpose of said object creation.

18. A system according to claims 4 and 17, characterised in that within said Webbike module, on receiving a request for at least one first object, said extraction sub-function additionally makes it possible to fill in the content of at least one member of at least one second object, different from said at least one first object, when raw data enabling said content to be filled in is present within said document with which said at least one Webbike page is synchronised.

19. A system according to any one of claims 17 and 18, characterised in that there are at least the three following types of Webbike nodes:

Webbike synchronisation nodes, making it possible to search for a “

markup”

language node or a “

markup”

language node “

frame”

in said at least one document expressed in a “

markup”

language, in order to position themselves on said “

markup”

language node or said “

frame”

;

Webbike structure nodes, making it possible to define at least one condition for operating said Webbike synchronisation nodes;

Webbike command nodes, making it possible to implement at least one pre-set operation after positioning on said “

markup”

language node or on said “

frame”

.

20. A system according to claim 19, characterised in that there is furthermore at least one of the following Webbike node types:

Webbike nodes of the type enabling the definition of an extraction sub-function;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling the display of the object or objects used in an extraction sub-function;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling the definition of a Webbike page;

Webbike nodes of the type able to be re-used with possibly a list of parameters;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling the declaration of the parameters of a page or of a re-usable node;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling another Webbike page to be called up without synchronisation on a “

markup”

language node;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling a re-usable node to be called up;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling the link to another Webbike page to be made;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling the definition of a dynamic URL for an HTML page;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling a value to be assigned to a parameter;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling a sequence of at least one Webbike node to be repeated;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling at least one command to be included in a normally unauthorised location of a sequence of at least one Webbike node;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling at least two methods of synchronisation to be defined depending on the content of a document;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling a sequence of at least one Webbike node to be interpreted conditionally.

21. A system according to claim 19, characterised in that said command type Webbike nodes belong to the group including:

Webbike nodes of the type enabling the definition of a block of at least one command associated with a node of the type enabling the definition of an extraction sub-function;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling the extraction of the textual content of a “

markup”

language node;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling the extraction of at least one attribute of the current “

markup”

language node;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling a constant value to be designated;

Webbike nodes of the type enabling functions to be provided for converting information extracted from a file expressed in a “

markup”

language.

22. A system according to claim 21, characterised in that said at least one command, of a block defined by a Webbike node, belongs to the following group:

object creation commands;

commands for modification of at least one object member.

23. A system according to any one of claims 17 to 22, characterised in that there are at least the two following Webbike page types:

static Webbike pages, analysed when launching said extraction sub-function;

dynamic Webbike pages, accessible from another Webbike page via a Webbike node of a particular type, called a Webbike link.

24. A system according to any one of claims 19 to 23, characterised in that there is at least one specific synchronisation Webbike node enabling a search for a pre-set “

markup”

language node, in order to position itself on said pre-set “

markup”

language node, and, additionally, a generic synchronisation Webbike node enabling a search for a non-pre-set “

markup”

language node which is not pre-set but specified as a parameter, in order to position itself on said non-pre-set “

markup”

language node.

25. A system according to any one of claims 19 to 24, characterised in that at least some of the synchronisation nodes take account of extraction conditions relating to attributes and/or to a textual content and/or to at least one son node of a found “

markup”

language node.

26. A system according to any one of claims 5 to 25, characterised in that said Webbike node implements a cookie management function.

27. A system according to claims 7 and 17, characterised in that at least one of said first and second specific languages is constructed using an XML language.

28. A system according to any one of claims 17 to 27, characterised in that said “

markup”

language belongs to the group including;

Extended Markup Languages (XML);

HyperText Markup Languages (HTML);

Standard Generalised Markup Languages (SGML) and derivatives;

Wireless Markup Languages (WML).

29. A process for implementing a system according to any one of claims 1 to 28, characterised in that it includes the following stages:

a terminal (3-10) issues a request (51) relating to a given application destined for said system (2);

to develop a response to said request, said response generation module (31) issues a request for at least one object to said at least one object creation module (30), so as to fill in the plurality of contexts of said application;

said at least one object creation module creates said at least one object and sends it back to said response generation module;

said response generation module generates a response in a generic presentation format, employing said browsing according to said browsing concept within said plurality of contexts;

said presentation module (32) receives from said response generation module said generic presentation format response and converts it into a response in a presentation format specific to the type of said terminal formulating said request;

said system sends said response in a presentation format specific to said terminal.

30. A process according to claim 29, characterised in that said process is iterative,

and in that the response to a given request depends on said browsing concept and on at least one request and/or previous response.