Interference suppression procedure for a superordinate nmc by correlation of alarms with results of automatic tests

• US 20030169851A1
• Filed: 01/24/2003
• Published: 09/11/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 07/24/2000
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Siemens AG
• Original Assignee: Siemens AG
• Inventors: Hirsch, Lucian
• Application Number:
  US10/333,781
• Publication Number:
  US 20030169851A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 379/33
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 3/08 Indicating faults in circuits or apparatus
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 3/2263 Network management
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 3/26 with means for applying test signals or for measuring

Abstract

The invention relates to an operation and maintenance center (OMC 7) that comprises a test device (8) which initiates, if alarm notifications (1) are received by the OMC (7), a test in response to said alarm in the hardware (5) of the telecommunications network (6) associated with said alarm, and transmits the results of said test to a superordinate national maintenance center (NMC 10) indicating the components which are affected by said alarm notification (1). The test is carried out in the OMC (7) according to a table (11), taking into consideration the manufacturer-specific peculiarities of the hardware (5) affected by the error notification (1).

Claims

1. A method for processing alarm messages (1) in a telecommunications network, in particular for processing OMC alarm messages (1) in a mobile telecommunications network (6, 7, 10),

wherein a test for elements (5) of the telecommunications network (6) which are identified by the alarm message (1) is started (2a) by a local monitoring center (OMC 7) in the event of this local monitoring center (OMC 7) receiving an alarm message (1),

and a further alarm message (1) relating to the alarm message (1) which has been received is sent from the local monitoring center OMC (7) to a superordinate monitoring center (NMC 10).

2. The method as claimed in claim 1,

characterized in that the method is carried out only at predetermined times, in particular at weekends and on public holidays.

3. The method as claimed in one of the preceding claims,

characterized in that alarm messages (1) which arrive at the local monitoring center (OMC 7) and/or results (3, 4) which relate to a test carried out in response to this alarm message (1) are sent (3, 4) to the superordinate monitoring center (10) with a reference to the test.

4. The method as claimed in one of the preceding claims,

characterized in that the local monitoring center (OMC 7) automatically starts (2a) the test, at least for predetermined types (11) of alarms, without having to check with the superordinate monitoring center (NMC 10).

5. The method as claimed in one of the preceding claims,

characterized in that the method is carried out only for types of alarms (1) which are classified as being critical and are stored in a table (11) in the local monitoring center (OMC 7).

6. The method as claimed in one of the preceding claims,

characterized in that, once a test has been carried out, the local monitoring center (OMC 7) sends to the superordinate monitoring center (NMC 10) the results (4) of the test and the parameters which relate to the hardware (5) of the telecommunications network (6) which initiated the original alarm message (1), with a reference to the association of the test with the further alarm message (1) which has already been passed on.

7. The method as claimed in one of the preceding claims,

characterized in that the test attempts to overcome the cause of the alarm message, and in that a negative test result means that the local monitoring center has not been able to overcome the cause of the alarm message.

8. The method as claimed in one of the preceding claims,

characterized in that the hardware (5) which is named or can be identified by the alarm message (1) is disconnected from the telecommunications network (6) and is then tested automatically for the test for detection and/or overcoming of the cause of the alarm message (1).

9. The method as claimed in one of the preceding claims,

characterized in that, in the case of test results (4) which are signaled to the superordinate monitoring center (NMC 10), these test results (4) are indicated to an operator of the superordinate monitoring center (NMC) in order to allow rectification measures to be taken.

10. A test device for a monitoring center (OMC 7), in particular for carrying out the method as claimed in one of the preceding claims,

having an input (into 8) for defects, which relate to alarm messages (1), in elements (5) of a telecommunications network (6),

having a device (8) for initiating (2b) tests for elements (5) of the telecommunications network which can be identified by alarm messages (1), and

having an output device (9) for passing on alarm messages (1) and results (3, 4) of tests to a superordinate monitoring center (NMC 10).

11. The test device as claimed in claim 10, characterized in that the test device is designed such that messages are passed on to an NMC (10) only at predetermined times, in particular at weekends and on public holidays.

12. The test device as claimed in one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the test device is designed such that an alarm message (1) which arrives at the local monitoring center (OMC 7), and/or results (3/4) which relate to a test carried out in response to this alarm message (1) are sent (3, 4) to the superordinate monitoring center (10) with a reference to the test.

13. The test device as claimed in one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the test device is designed such that the local monitoring center (OMC 7) automatically starts (2a) the test, at least for predetermined types (11) of alarms, without having to check with the superordinate monitoring center (NMC 10).

14. The test device as claimed in one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the test device has a table (11) of alarms which are classified as being critical and for which alarms only one test is to be initiated.

15. The test device as claimed in one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the test device is designed such that, after the local monitoring center (OMC 7) has carried out a test, the results (4) of the test and parameters which relate to the hardware (5) of the telecommunications network (6) which initiated the original alarm message are sent to the superordinate monitoring center (NMC 10), with a reference to the association of the test with the further alarm message (1) which has already been passed on.

16. The test device as claimed in one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the test device is designed such that the test attempts to overcome the cause of the alarm message, and such that a negative test result means that the local monitoring center has not been able to overcome the cause of the alarm message.

17. The test device as claimed in one of the preceding claims,

characterized in that the test device is designed such that the hardware (5) which is named or can be identified by the alarm message (1) is disconnected from the telecommunications network (6) and is tested independently of the telecommunications network for the test for detection and/or overcoming of the cause of the alarm message (1).

18. The test device as claimed in one of the preceding claims,

characterized in that the test device is designed such that, in the case of test results (4) which are signaled to the superordinate monitoring center (NMC 10), these test results (4) are indicated to an operator of the superordinate monitoring center (NMC 10) in order to allow rectification measures to be taken.