Methods and systems for selling goods and services

• US 20030182175A1
• Filed: 03/21/2002
• Published: 09/25/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 03/21/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Painpowerfit, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Painpowerfit, Inc.
• Inventors: Kearney, Susan, Buie, John V.W.
• Application Number:
  US10/105,103
• Publication Number:
  US 20030182175A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/10
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06375 Prediction of business process outcome or impact based on a proposed change
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0201 Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data

Abstract

Method and systems of qualifying opportunities for change are disclosed wherein certain parameters of each opportunity for change are evaluated against similar parameters of past or theoretical successes. If an opportunity for change does not qualify in comparison to one or more historical success, it is abandoned in favor of an opportunity for change that does qualify. In one aspect the opportunity for change is closing a sale to a sales prospect and nine specific elements of the sales prospect are rated and compared to similar ratings of previous successes. The nine elements relate to three different parameters including: (1) an opportunity or problem of the prospect; (2) a decision maker of the prospect; and (3) a fit of a solution proposal to address the opportunity or problem.

Claims

1. A method of qualifying an opportunity for change comprising:

assigning ratings to a plurality of success parameters for the opportunity of change;

comparing the assigned ratings to a minimum threshold, the minimum threshold representing a threshold of success parameters present in a successful endeavor; and

designating the opportunity for change as a qualified opportunity if a majority of assigned ratings are equal to or greater than the minimum threshold.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the plurality of success parameters comprises three parameters, each of the three parameters representing various merits of every opportunity for change.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the three parameters comprise a first success parameter representing merits of a problem or opportunity;

a second success parameter representing merits of a decision maker; and

a third success parameter representing merits of a proposal to address the problem or opportunity.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the minimum threshold comprises ratings derived from a previous success.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the minimum threshold comprises ratings derived from a theoretical success.

6. The method of claim 2 wherein assigning ratings to the plurality of success parameters comprises:

rating two or more elements for each success parameter.

7. The method of claim 3 wherein assigning ratings to the plurality of success parameters comprises:

rating two or more elements of the first success parameter;

rating two or more elements of the second success parameter; and

rating two or more elements of the third success parameter.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein three elements are rated for the first success parameter, the three elements comprising:

(i) a critical element;

(ii) a recognition element; and

(iii) a specificity element.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein three elements are rated for the second success parameter, the three elements comprising:

(i) a wherewithal element;

(ii) a leadership element; and

(iii) credibility element.

10. The method of claim 7 wherein three elements are rated for the third success parameter, the three elements comprising:

(i) a suitable element;

(ii) an advantage element; and

(iii) a timeliness element.

11. The method of claim 6 wherein, comparing and designating are performed by a processing device executing machine-readable code.

12. A method of selling Goods comprising:

identifying one or more prospects for the Goods;

evaluating potential success information for a first prospect;

comparing the evaluated potential success information with corresponding historical success information, the historical success information derived from one or more historical successes; and

if the compared evaluated potential success information meets or exceeds the historical success information, (i) pursuing a sale of Goods to the first prospect, else (ii) abandoning pursuit of the first prospect.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the potential success information comprises a plurality of elements relating to three aspects of a potential sale.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein the three aspects comprise a first aspect relating to a problem or opportunity, a second aspect relating to a decision maker, and a third aspect relating to a proposal'"'"'s fit in addressing the problem or opportunity.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein the plurality of elements comprises three elements for each aspect including:

critical, recognition and specificity elements for the first aspect;

wherewithal, leadership and credibility elements for the second aspect; and

suitability, advantage and timeliness elements for the third aspect.

16. The method of claim 12 wherein comparing the evaluated potential success information with corresponding historical success information is performed using a processing device executing machine readable code.

17. The method of claim 12 wherein pursuing the sale of Goods to the first prospect comprises designating the sale of Goods to the first prospect into a sales pipeline as a qualified opportunity.

18. A method of teaching others, using a medium of expression, to qualify an opportunity for change, the method comprising:

instructing others to identify information about the opportunity for change;

instructing others to assign ratings for certain characteristics of the opportunity for change;

instructing others how to compare assigned ratings with one or more minimum thresholds, the one or more minimum thresholds representing minimum criteria required for implementing a change; and

instructing others to deem the opportunity for change as qualified if the assigned ratings meet or exceed the one or more minimum thresholds.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein the certain characteristics comprise a plurality of elements relating to three aspects of the opportunity for change including a first aspect pertaining to a problem or opportunity, a second aspect pertaining to a decision maker, and a third aspect pertaining to a fit of a proposal to address the problem or opportunity.

20. The method of claim 19 wherein the plurality of elements comprises three or more elements for each aspect including:

critical, recognition and specificity elements for the first aspect;

wherewithal, leadership and credibility elements for the second aspect; and

suitability, advantage and timeliness elements for the third aspect.

21. The method of claim 18 wherein the medium of expression comprises one of, a computerized tutorial, an in-person seminar, an online training course, an audio recording and a video recording.

22. A system for evaluating an opportunity for change, the system comprising:

a medium for accepting user input of;

(i) information about the opportunity for change; and

(ii) a plurality of ratings regarding characteristics of opportunity for change;

wherein each of the plurality of ratings is assigned a value by a user, the value corresponding to a magnitude of which the corresponding element is present in the opportunity for change.

23. The system of claim 22 wherein the medium comprises a paper medium including one or more sheets of paper having spaces for the user to input ratings for the characteristics of the opportunity for change including criticality, recognition, specific, wherewithal, leadership, credibility, suitable, advantage and timely.

24. The system of claim 22 wherein the medium comprises an electronic medium comprising input means for inputting the general information and the plurality of ratings for the characteristics of criticality, recognition, specific, wherewithal, leadership, credibility, suitable, advantage and timeliness.

25. The system of claim 24 further comprising:

storage means for storing inputted information and storing other information;

processing means for comparing the inputted ratings with stored other information to determine whether the opportunity for change is qualified; and

output means for outputting information regarding the comparison.

26. The system of claim 24 further comprising network connection means for storing or outputting information to, or retrieving information from, a remote location.

27. A method of selling comprising:

identifying at least one prospect;

identifying a problem or opportunity that exists for the prospect;

rating at least two characteristics of the problem or opportunity;

identifying a decision maker for the prospect;

rating at least two characteristics of the decision maker;

determining a proposal to address the problem or opportunity;

rating at least two characteristics of the proposal;

comparing the rated characteristics with one or more minimum thresholds; and

designating the prospect as being a qualified opportunity if the rated characteristics meet or exceed the one or more minimum thresholds.

28. The method of claim 27 wherein, if the rated characteristics do not meet or exceed the one or more minimum thresholds, the method further comprises:

determining whether any of the rated characteristics may be influenced or controlled to meet or exceed the one or more minimum thresholds; and

(i) if so, determining whether costs associated with influencing or controlling the rated characteristics negate any benefits derived from a sale, and if the costs do not negate the benefits, designating the prospect as the qualified opportunity.

29. The method of claim 27 wherein three characteristics are rated for the problem or opportunity including:

(i) criticality, (ii) recognition and (iii) specificity.

30. The method of claim 27 wherein three characteristics are rated for the decision maker including:

(i) wherewithal, (ii) leadership and (iii) credibility.

31. The method of claim 27 wherein three characteristics are rated for the proposal including:

(i) suitability, (ii) advantage and (iii) timeliness.