Medical device or system and method for the operation thereof

• US 20030204131A1
• Filed: 04/11/2003
• Published: 10/30/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 04/29/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Siemens Audiologische Technik GmbH (Siemens AG)
• Original Assignee: Siemens Audiologische Technik GmbH (Siemens AG)
• Inventors: Aschoff, Stefan, Weidner, Roland, Bindner, Joerg
• Application Number:
  US10/412,376
• Publication Number:
  US 20030204131A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 600/300
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/40 for the management of medical equipment or devices, e.g. scheduling maintenance or upgrades
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/63 for local operation
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/67 for remote operation
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/20 for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems

Abstract

The operation of a medical device or system is simplified and improved by storing data with respect to possible processing or operating sequences in a data bank. The stored data are compared to processing or operating steps executed by a user. Dependent on the comparison result, prompts to further, meaningful processing or operating steps are generated, and settings and functions of the medical device or system are automatically implemented.

Claims

1. A method for operating a medical apparatus comprising the steps of:

for a medical apparatus, storing in a databank a plurality of possible execution sequences, selected from the group consisting of processing steps and operating steps, for said medical apparatus;

operating said medical apparatus using a manually-entered execution sequence and, as said manually-entered execution sequence is executed by said medical apparatus, comparing said manually-entered execution sequence to said plurality of execution sequences in said databank and obtaining a comparison result; and

optimizing operation of said medical apparatus dependent on said comparison result.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of optimizing operation of said medical apparatus comprises automatically providing humanly perceptible operating prompts.

3. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of optimizing operation of said medical apparatus comprises automatically altering said manually-entered execution program using alterations, selected from the group consisting of parameter settings and functions, derived from said comparison result.

4. A method as claimed in claim 1 comprising automatically logging steps in said manually-entered execution sequence.

5. A method as claimed in claim 1 comprising the additional step of evaluating said manually-entered execution sequence.

6. A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein the step of evaluating said manually-entered execution sequence comprises evaluating said manually-entered execution sequence in a master databank separate from said databank.

7. A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein the step of evaluating said manually-entered execution sequence comprises transmitting said manually-entered execution sequence to a location of an expert, and evaluating said manually-entered execution sequence at said location by said expert.

8. A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein the step of evaluating said manually-entered execution sequence comprises transferring said manually-entered execution sequence to an addressee of a computer network, and evaluating said manually-entered execution sequence at said addressee,

9. A method as claimed in claim 8 comprising automatically transferring said manually-entered execution sequence to said addressee.

10. A method as claimed in claim 8 comprising employing the Internet as said computer network.

11. A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein the step of evaluating said manually-entered execution sequence produces an evaluation result, and comprising the additional step of storing said evaluation result in a master databank separate from said databank.

12. A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein the step of evaluating said manually-entered execution sequence produces an evaluation result, and comprising the additional step of storing said evaluation result in said databank as a further execution sequence in said plurality of possible execution sequences.

13. A system comprising:

a medical apparatus;

a databank in which a plurality of possible execution sequences for said medical apparatus are stored, selected from the group consisting of processing steps and operating steps;

a control unit for operating said medical apparatus, said control unit having access to said data bank;

an input/output unit allowing entry by a user, into said control unit, of a manually-entered execution sequence for said medical apparatus; and

said control unit operating said medical apparatus using said manually-entered execution sequence and, as said manually-entered execution sequence is executed by said medical apparatus, said control unit comparing said manually-entered execution sequence to said plurality of execution sequences in said databank and obtaining a comparison result, and optimizing operation of said medical apparatus dependent on said comparison result.

14. A system as claimed in claim 13 wherein said control unit optimizes operation of said medical apparatus by automatically providing humanly perceptible operating prompts at said input/output unit.

15. A system as claimed in claim 13 wherein said control unit optimizes operation of said medical apparatus by automatically altering said manually-entered execution program using alterations, selected from the group consisting of parameter settings and functions, derived from said comparison result.

16. A system as claimed in claim 13 said control unit automatically logs steps in said manually-entered execution sequence.

17. A system as claimed in claim 13 comprising a master databank separate from said databank for evaluating said manually-entered execution sequence comprises evaluating said manually-entered execution sequence.

18. A system as claimed in claim 17 wherein said mater databank produces an evaluation result from evaluating said manually-entered execution sequence stores said evaluation result.

19. A system as claimed in claim 18 wherein said control unit stores said evaluation result in said databank as a further execution sequence in said plurality of possible execution sequences.

20. A system as claimed in claim 13 wherein said control unit transmits said manually-entered execution sequence to a location of an expert for evaluating said manually-entered execution sequence.

21. A system as claimed in claim 20 wherein said expert produces an evaluation result, and transmits said evaluation result to said control unit, and wherein said control unit stores said evaluation result in said databank as further execution sequence in said plurality of possible execution sequences.

22. A system as claimed in claim 13 wherein said control unit transfers said manually-entered execution sequence to an addressee of a computer network for evaluating said manually-entered execution sequence at said addressee,

23. A system as claimed in claim 22 wherein evaluation of said manually-entered execution sequence at said addressee produces an evaluation result, and wherein said evaluation result is transferred via said computer network to said control unit, and wherein said control unit stores said evaluation result in said databank as a further execution sequence in said plurality of possible execution sequences

24. A system as claimed in claim 22 wherein said control unit automatically transfers said manually-entered execution sequence to said addressee.

25. A system as claimed in claim 22 wherein said control unit employs the Internet as said computer network.