Verification engine controller software

• US 20030204301A1
• Filed: 04/24/2002
• Published: 10/30/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 04/24/2002
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: FCA US LLC (Stellantis NV)
• Original Assignee: Daimler Chrysler Corporation (Mercedes-Benz Group AG)
• Inventors: Seitz, Gary L., Ploucha, David P., Yannone, Ronald A. Jr., Barkman, David A., Donahue, Colleen M., Forgiel, Robert T., Li, Zhong, Cheng, Yi, Krausman, Howard W., Moote, Richard K.
• Granted Patent: US 6,732,029 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 701/101
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/062 for starting F02D41/061 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/22 Safety or indicating devices for abnormal conditions in air/fuel ratio feedback systems F02D41/1495, in electric control linkage F02D11/107, in purge control systems F02M25/0809
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 23/0251 Abstraction hierarchy, e.g. "complex systems", i.e. system is divided in subsystems, subsystems are monitored and results are combined to decide on status of whole system
• CPC Class Codes: Y02T 10/40 Engine management systems

Abstract

A method of determining the quality of subsystems of an electronic engine control system is provided. The method monitors an engine parameter representative of a subsystem of interest and compares the parameter to at least one quality limit. The at least one quality limit represents an acceptable performance boundary for a fully functional engine control system. The method then indicates, based on the result of the comparison, whether the subsystem is of satisfactory quality. The method is arranged, without limitation, to determining the quality of start time, start flare, idle control during transmission shift, and speed control.

Claims

1. In an electronic engine control system having diagnostics for determining whether a component of the system has failed and a means for communicating with a diagnostic scan tool, a method for determining the quality of the system, the method comprising the steps of:

monitoring an engine parameter representative of the quality of a subsystem of interest;

comparing said parameter to at least one quality limit, wherein said at least one quality limit represents an acceptable performance boundary for a fully functional engine control system; and

based on the result of said comparing step, indicating whether said subsystem is of satisfactory quality.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of maintaining a histogram of the number of times said comparison step resulted in said indication of satisfactory quality versus the number of times said comparison step resulted in an indication of unsatisfactory quality.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising capturing the difference between said parameter and said at least one quality boundary.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising waiting for a predetermined condition to occur prior to comparing said parameter to said quality limits.

5. The method of claim 4 arranged to determine the start flare quality of the electronic engine control system wherein the system further comprises a start flare test timer of a predetermined duration, said start flare test timer is arranged to begin counting when said predetermined condition is satisfied;

said predetermined condition comprising an ignition switch being on coincident with an engine RPM of approximately zero;

said parameter comprising engine RPM;

said quality boundary comprising a maximum allowable RPM limit; and

said comparison taking place between said maximum allowable RPM limit and said engine RPM;

said subsystem being of satisfactory quality when said engine RPM remains less than said maximum allowable RPM limit until said start flare test timer has expired.

6. The method of claim 4 arranged to determine the speed control quality of the engine control system, said predetermined condition comprising said speed control system being engaged;

said parameter comprising vehicle speed;

said at least one quality boundary further comprising upper and a lower quality boundaries; and

said comparison taking place between said vehicle speed and said upper and lower quality boundaries, said speed control system being of satisfactory quality when said vehicle speed remains less than said upper quality boundary and greater than said lower quality boundary during a time period after said predetermined condition.

7. The method of claim 4 arranged to determine the shift quality of the engine control system, said predetermined condition comprising a transmission being shifted into one of neutral and a drive gear;

said parameter comprising engine RPM;

said at least one quality boundary further comprising upper and a lower quality boundaries; and

said comparison taking place between said engine RPM and said upper and lower quality boundaries, said shift quality being of satisfactory when said engine RPM remains less than said upper quality boundary and greater than said lower quality boundary during a time period after said predetermined condition.

8. In an electronic engine control system having diagnostics for determining whether a component of the system has failed and a means for communicating with a diagnostic scan tool, a method for determining the quality of the system comprising:

monitoring an engine parameter representative of the quality of a subsystem of interest;

comparing said parameter to at least one quality limit, wherein said at least one quality limit is a function of a second parameter and represents an acceptable performance boundary for a fully functional engine control system; and

based on the result of said comparing step, indicating whether said subsystem is of satisfactory quality.

9. The method of claim 8 further comprising the step of maintaining a histogram of the number of times said comparison step resulted in said indication of satisfactory quality versus the number of times said comparison step resulted in an indication of unsatisfactory quality.

10. The method of claim 8 further comprising capturing the difference between said parameter and said at least one quality boundary.

11. The method of claim 8 further comprising waiting for a predetermined condition to occur prior to comparing said parameter to said quality limits.

12. The method of claim 11 arranged to determine the start flare quality of the electronic engine control system wherein the system further comprises a start flare test timer of a predetermined duration, said start flare test timer is arranged to begin counting when said predetermined condition is satisfied;

said predetermined condition comprising an ignition switch being on coincident with an engine RPM of approximately zero;

said parameter comprising engine RPM;

said quality boundary comprising a maximum allowable RPM limit; and

said comparison taking place between said maximum allowable RPM limit and said engine RPM;

said subsystem being of satisfactory quality when said engine RPM remains less than said maximum allowable RPM limit until said start flare test timer has expired.

13. The method of claim 11 arranged to determine the speed control quality of the engine control system, said predetermined condition comprising said speed control system being engaged;

said parameter comprising vehicle speed;

said at least one quality boundary further comprising upper and a lower quality boundaries; and

said comparison taking place between said vehicle speed and said upper and lower quality boundaries, said speed control system being of satisfactory quality when said vehicle speed remains less than said upper quality boundary and greater than said lower quality boundary during a time period after said predetermined condition.

14. The method of claim 11 arranged to determine the shift quality of the engine control system, said predetermined condition comprising a transmission being shifted into one of neutral and a drive gear;

said parameter comprising engine RPM;

said at least one quality boundary further comprising upper and a lower quality boundaries; and

said comparison taking place between said engine RPM and said upper and lower quality boundaries, said shift quality being of satisfactory when said engine RPM remains less than said upper quality boundary and greater than said lower quality boundary during a time period after said predetermined condition.

15. The method of claim 8, said second parameter comprising engine coolant temperature.

16. In an electronic engine control system having diagnostics for determining whether a component of the system has failed and a means for communicating with a diagnostic scan tool having a display, a method for determining the quality of the system comprising:

maintaining a timer;

monitoring an engine parameter of interest while said timer is active;

comparing said parameter to at least one limit;

upon said parameter reaching said at least one limit, comparing the present value of said timer to a quality boundary, wherein said quality boundary represents an acceptable performance boundary for a fully functional engine control system; and

based on the result of said comparison of said timer to said quality boundary, causing the display to indicate whether said subsystem is of satisfactory quality.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein said quality boundary is the function of a second parameter.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein said timer becomes active upon the occurrence of a predetermined event.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein said second parameter is engine coolant temperature.

20. The method of claim 19 arranged to determine the start time quality of an internal combustion engine, said engine parameter of interest comprising engine RPM;

said at least one limit comprising an RPM indicative of said engine running;

said predetermined event comprising a crankshaft of said engine just beginning to rotate; and

said quality limit represents the maximum desirable time required for the engine to start.