Method and system for improved security

• US 20030210139A1
• Filed: 12/03/2002
• Published: 11/13/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 12/03/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Stephen Brooks
• Original Assignee: Stephen Brooks
• Inventors: Brooks, Stephen, Crosby, David F.
• Application Number:
  US10/309,615
• Publication Number:
  US 20030210139A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 340/531
• CPC Class Codes: B64F 1/368 Arrangements or installations for routing, distributing or loading baggage
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/04 Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem" market predictions or forecasting for commercial activities G06Q30/0202
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/30 Transportation; Communications
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/40 Business processes related to the transportation industry shipping G06Q10/083

Abstract

A comprehensive method and system for providing improved security at an existing facility or providing improved security in the design of a facility to be built. The system and method can be used to evaluate an existing facility in order to determines an overall rating for a particular facility and which can also be used identify individual or elemental weakness of the facility. The method and system can analyze the data gathered during the evaluation in order to determine remedial measures that can be used to improve the facility'"'"'s overall rating and strengthen the identified individual or elemental weaknesses. A comprehensive system that monitors the flow of people, vehicles, luggage, packages and airplanes in order to provide improved security is also disclosed.

Claims

1. A method of evaluating a facility comprising:

identifying components of said facility, said components optionally including associated security measures;

evaluating each component to determine an appropriate security level for that component; and

rating each component as a function of the security measures associated with said component.

2. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:

determining a security rating for each component as a function of the security measures associated with said component.

3. The method according to claim 2 further comprising:

ranking the components as a function of said security rating.

4. The method according to claim 2 further comprising:

determining a security rating for each component as a function of the security rating for said component and an evaluation value determined as a function of the evaluation of said component to determine an appropriate security level for that component.

5. The method according to claim 4 further comprising:

ranking the components as a function of said security rating.

6. The method according to claim 2 further comprising:

determining a security rating for each component as a function of the product of the security rating for said component and an evaluation value determined as a function of the evaluation of said component to determine an appropriate security level for that component.

7. The method according to claim 6 further comprising:

ranking the components as a function of said security rating.

8. The method according to claim 2 further comprising:

determining a security rating for the facility as a function of the security rating for at least one of the components of the facility.

9. The method according to claim 2 further comprising:

determining a security rating for the facility as a function of the security rating for at least one component of the facility and an evaluation value determined as a function of the evaluation of said at least one component to determine an appropriate security level for said at least one component.

10. The method according to claim 9 comprising determining the security rating for the facility as a function of the security rating and the evaluation value determine for at least two components of the facility.

11. The method according to claim 10 comprising determining the security rating for the facility as a function of the sums of the products of the security rating and the evaluation value determine for said at least two components of the facility.

12. The method according to claim 2 further comprising:

ranking the components as a function of said security rating.

13. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:

determining a security rating for each component as a function of the security measures associated with said component and an evaluation value determined as a function of the evaluation of each component to determine an appropriate security level for that component.

14. The method according to claim 13 further comprising:

ranking the components as a function of said security rating.

15. A system for evaluating a facility comprising:

a computer processor and associated memory and data input devices,

a data structure adapted for storing information relating to at least one component of said facility, said at least one component optionally including associated security measures and said data structure being adapted to store information relating to said associated security measures.

16. The system of claim 15 wherein said data structure is adapted to store information relating to an appropriate security level for said at least one component.

17. The system of claim 15 wherein said data structure is adapted to store information relating to a security rating for said at least one component.

18. The system of claim 17 wherein said security rating is determined as a function of the security measures associated with said at least one component.

19. The system of claim 15 further comprising a data communications link for transmitting information stored in said data structure to a central repository.

20. The system of claim 15 wherein said data structure is a database.

21. The system of claim 15 wherein said data structure is an XML document.

22. The system of claim 15 further comprising:

a subsystem for comparing information relating to said at least one component of said facility to a set of predefined information relating to possible components of a facility and modifying said information relating to said at least one component.

23. The system of claim 22 wherein said set of predefined information includes predefined security ratings for possible components of a facility and said subsystem modifies a security rating in said information relating to said at least one component as a function of said information relating to said at least one component and said predefined information.

24. The system of claim 15 wherein said data structure includes information relating to a plurality of components of said facility, said system further comprising:

a subsystem adapted for determining a security rating for each component as a function of the security measures associated with said component.

25. The system of claim 24 further including a subsystem adapted for ranking the components as a function of said security rating.

26. The system of claim 24 further comprising:

a subsystem adapted for determining a security rating for each component as a function of the security rating for said component and an evaluation value determined as a function of the evaluation of said component to determine an appropriate security level for that component.

27. The system of claim 26 further comprising:

a subsystem adapted for ranking the components as a function of said security rating.

28. The system of claim 24 further comprising:

a subsystem adapted for determining a security rating for each component as a function of the product of the security rating for said component and an evaluation value determined as a function of the evaluation of said component to determine an appropriate security level for that component.

29. The system of claim 28 further comprising:

a subsystem adapted for ranking the components as a function of said security rating.

30. The system of claim 24 further comprising:

a subsystem adapted for determining a security rating for the facility as a function of the security rating for at least one of the components of the facility.

31. The system of claim 24 further comprising:

a subsystem adapted for determining a security rating for the facility as a function of the security rating for at least one component of the facility and an evaluation value determined as a function of the evaluation of said at least one component to determine an appropriate security level for said at least one component.

32. The system of claim 31 comprising a subsystem adapted for determining the security rating for the facility as a function of the security rating and the evaluation value determine for at least two components of the facility.

33. The system of claim 32 comprising a subsystem adapted for determining the security rating for the facility as a function of the sums of the products of the security rating and the evaluation value determine for said at least two components of the facility.

34. The system of claim 24 further comprising:

a subsystem adapted for ranking the components as a function of said security rating.

35. The system of claim 15 wherein said data structure includes information relating to a plurality of components of said facility, said system further comprising:

a subsystem adapted for determining a security rating for each component as a function of the security measures associated with said component and an evaluation value determined as a function of the evaluation of each component to determine an appropriate security level for that component.

36. The system of claim 35 further comprising:

a subsystem adapted for ranking the components as a function of said security rating.

37. A security system for a facility comprising:

a plurality of computer systems interconnected by a communication network for transmitting and receiving data over said network,

a data storage device operatively connected with a first computer system for storing security information, said security information including stored attribute data representative of at least one attribute of a person or an object,

a plurality of sensing devices operatively connected to said network for transmitting and receiving data over said network, said sensing devices being adapted to detect at least one attribute of a person or an object and being adapted for generating sensed attribute data representative of said at least one attribute; and

means for comparing said sensed attribute data with said stored attribute data.

38. An inter-facility security system comprising:

a plurality of facilities, each facility including at least one computer system connected to a common communication network for transmitting and receiving data over said communication network;

a central data storage system operatively connected to said communication network for storing security information, said security information including stored attribute data representative of at least one attribute of a person or an object,

at least one of said plurality of facilities including at least on sensing device operatively connected said at least one computer system of said facility for transmitting and receiving data to and from said at least one computer system, said at least one sensing device being adapted to detect at least one attribute of a person or an object and being adapted for generating sensed attribute data representative of said at least one attribute; and

means for comparing said sensed attribute data with said stored attribute data.