Method and system for measuring the success of treatment of a medical therapy

• US 20030225316A1
• Filed: 04/10/2003
• Published: 12/04/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 04/10/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Siemens AG
• Original Assignee: Siemens AG
• Inventors: Hein, Achim, Abraham-Fuchs, Klaus, Setz, Robert, Eisermann, Uwe, Richter, Niels
• Application Number:
  US10/410,162
• Publication Number:
  US 20030225316A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 600/300
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 10/60 for patient-specific data, e.g. for electronic patient records
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 20/30 relating to physical therapies or activities, e.g. physiotherapy, acupressure or exercising
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/63 for local operation
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/20 for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 70/60 relating to pathologies

Abstract

A method and a system are for measuring the success of treatment of a medical therapy. In the method, at least one treatment objective is defined at a first data processing station and a calculation rule is provided for the success of treatment of the therapy, the calculation rule indicating the success of treatment as a function of recordable numerical measures. Furthermore, a second data processing station is provided for the automated recording and transmission of the numerical measures describing the success of treatment to the first data processing station. At the start of the therapy, the initial state of the patient with respect to the treatment objective is recorded using first numerical measures. During and/or at the end of the treatment, automatic second numerical measures describing the success of treatment are recorded by way of the second data processing station. The success of treatment is automatically calculated with reference to these numerical measures and represented at the first data processing station or at a further data processing station. The method permits reliable and automated measurement of the success of treatment of a medical therapy, in particular in the field of telemedical forms of treatment, and can be advantageously integrated into the normal course of therapy.

Claims

1. A method for measuring the success of treatment of a medical therapy having the following steps:

defining at least one treatment objective of the therapy at a first data processing station;

provisioning a calculation rule for the success of treatment of the therapy with respect to the treatment objective, which indicates success of treatment as a function of recordable numerical measures, the provisioning taking place at the first data processing station by selection from calculation rules assigned to the therapy and automatically called from a database;

recording at least one first numerical measure describing an initial state of a person to be subjected to the therapy, with respect to the treatment objective;

storing data covering at least the treatment objective, the calculation rule and the first numerical measures;

recording at least one second numerical measure describing the success of treatment of the person at least one of during and at the end of the therapy, the recording occurring via a second data processing station;

calling the stored data and automatically calculating the success of treatment using at least one of the calculation rule at the first data processing station and second data processing station, wherein at least one of the second numerical measures and the success of treatment, possibly already calculated at the second data processing station, is transmitted to the first data processing station via a network; and

representing the success of treatment at the first data processing station.

2. The method for determining the success of treatment of a medical therapy as claimed in claim 1, wherein a calculation rule indicating the success of treatment as a function of at least one of the costs, the costs and the duration of the therapy and the compliance of the patient is provided at a computer workstation.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the calculation rule is a comparison rule according to which recorded numerical measures are compared using a look-up table, stored in a database and linking the recorded numerical measures to a value of the success of treatment.

18. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the calculation rule is provided in a form editable by the user and wherein a calculation rule, at least one of newly created and modified by the user, is added to the database.

19. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second data processing station is configured for the automated recording and transmission of the second numerical measures describing the success of treatment to the first data processing station.

20. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the recording of the second numerical measures describing the success of treatment at least one of is brought about by the first data processing station and takes place at predefinable time intervals.

21. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein at least one of the second numerical measures are recorded using a device connected to the second data processing station.

22. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein, in order to record second numerical measures which cannot be acquired in an automated fashion, at least one of the first and second data processing station generates a notification for the agreement of an appointment for the acquisition of these second numerical measures.

23. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein partial objectives, the attainment of which is monitored by multiple calculation of the success of treatment during the duration of the treatment, are predefined at the first data processing station.

24. The method as claimed in claim 23, wherein the successes of treatment, measured at various times, are stored and represented in the form of a profile curve.

25. The method as claimed in claim 24, wherein a reference curve is predefined for the profile and when the profile curve deviates from the reference curve by a predefinable value, an alarm is issued.

26. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the success of treatment is calculated with respect to the time taken up by the treatment.

27. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the success of treatment is calculated taking into account the compliance of the patient.

30. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the calculation rule is a comparison rule according to which recorded numerical measures are compared using a look-up table, stored in a database and linking the recorded numerical measures to a value of the success of treatment.

43. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein, in order to record second numerical measures which cannot be acquired in an automated fashion, at least one of the first and second data processing station generates a proposal, for the agreement of an appointment for the acquisition of these second numerical measures.

44. A system for carrying out the method of claim 1, comprising:

a first data processing station having a first module for defining the treatment objective, for providing the calculation rule and for automated execution of the calculation with reference to at least one of transmitted and stored numerical measures, wherein the first module is connected, for provisioning of the calculation rule, to a database containing calculation rules assigned to different therapies and treatment objectives; and

a second data processing station, connected to the first data processing station at least temporarily via a network and including a second module for the automatic recording and transmission of numerical measures to the first module of the first data processing station at predefinable times.

47. The system as claimed in claim 44, wherein the second data processing station is connected, via at least one interface, to a device for measuring the numerical measures.

4. A method for measuring the success of treatment of a medical therapy comprising the following steps:

defining at least one treatment objective of the therapy at a first data processing station;

provisioning a calculation rule for the success of treatment of the therapy with respect to the treatment objective, which indicates the success of treatment as a function of recordable numerical measures, the provisioning taking place at the first data processing station, the provisioning of the calculation rule including the selection of categories to be included in the calculation, and the categories and calculation rules assigned to the selection being called from a database;

recording at least one first numerical measure describing an initial state of a person to be subjected to the therapy, with respect to the treatment objective;

storing data covering at least the treatment objective, the calculation rule and the first numerical measures;

recording at least one second numerical measure describing the success of treatment of the person at least one of during and at the end of the therapy via a second data processing station;

calling the stored data and automatically calculating the success of treatment using the calculation rule at at least one of the first data processing station and the second data processing station, wherein at least one of the second numerical measure and the success of treatment, having possibly been calculated at the second data processing station, is transmitted to the first data processing station via a network; and

representing the success of treatment at the first data processing station.

5. The method for determining the success of treatment of a medical therapy as claimed in claim 4, wherein a calculation rule indicating the success of treatment as a function of at least one of the costs, the costs and the duration of the therapy, and the compliance of the patient is provided at a computer workstation.

6. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the calculation rule is a comparison rule according to which recorded numerical measures are compared using a look-up table, stored in a database and linking the recorded numerical measures to a value of the success of treatment.

7. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the categories in the database are assigned to treatment objectives and only the categories relevant to the respective treatment objective are offered for selection.

8. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the selection of the calculation rule and of the associated categories is carried out by a customary computer input mechanism.

31. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the calculation rule is a comparison rule according to which recorded numerical measures are compared using a look-up table, stored in a database and linking the recorded numerical measures to a value of the success of treatment.

32. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the selection of the calculation rule and of the associated categories is carried out by at least one of clicking on a mouse and by use of drag and drop.

35. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the calculation rule is provided in a form editable by the user and wherein a calculation rule, at least one of newly created and modified by the user, is added to the database.

36. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the second data processing station is configured for the automated recording and transmission of the second numerical measures describing the success of treatment to the first data processing station.

37. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the recording of the second numerical measures describing the success of treatment at least one of is brought about by the first data processing station and takes place at predefinable time intervals.

41. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein at least one of the second numerical measures are recorded using a device connected to the second data processing station.

45. A system for carrying out the method of claim 4, comprising:

a first data processing station having a first module for defining the treatment objective, for providing the calculation rule and for automated execution of the calculation with reference to at least one of transmitted and stored numerical measures, wherein the first module is connected, for provisioning of the calculation rule, to a database containing calculation rules assigned to different therapies and treatment objectives; and

a second data processing station, connected to the first data processing station at least temporarily via a network and including a second module for the automatic recording and transmission of numerical measures to the first module of the first data processing station at predefinable times.

48. The system as claimed in claim 45, wherein the second data processing station is connected, via at least one interface, to a device for measuring the numerical measures.

9. A method for measuring the success of treatment of a medical therapy having the following steps:

defining at least one treatment objective of the therapy at a first data processing station;

at least one of provisioning and inputting a calculation rule for the success of treatment of the therapy with respect to the treatment objective, the rule indicating the success of treatment as a function of recordable numerical measures and the at least one of provisioning and inputting occurring at the first data processing station, wherein the success of treatment is calculated with respect to the costs incurred for it, and wherein the costs are taken into account with key variables, easily recordable and proportional to the costs;

recording at least one first numerical measure describing an initial state of a person to be subjected to the therapy, with respect to the treatment objective;

storing data covering at least the treatment objective, the calculation rule and the first numerical measures;

recording at least one second numerical measure describing the success of treatment of the person at least one of during and at the end of the therapy using a second data processing station;

calling the stored data and automatically calculating the success of treatment using the calculation rule at at least one of the first data processing station and the second data processing station, wherein at least one of the second numerical measures and the success of treatment, having possibly been calculated at the second data processing station, is transmitted to the first data processing station via a network; and

representing the success of treatment at the first data processing station.

10. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein, in the case of the costs, only the costs influenceable by at least one of the service provider and the patient are included in the calculation.

11. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein cost proportions and key variables relating to the selected therapy are called from a database and displayed for selection in an automated fashion.

12. The method for determining the success of treatment of a medical therapy as claimed in claim 9, wherein a calculation rule indicating the success of treatment as a function of at least one of the costs, the costs and the duration of the therapy, and the compliance of the patient is provided at a computer workstation.

13. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the calculation rule is a comparison rule according to which recorded numerical measures are compared using a look-up table, stored in a database and linking the recorded numerical measures to a value of the success of treatment.

14. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the provision of the calculation rule includes the selection from calculation rules assigned to the therapy and automatically called from a database.

15. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the provision of the calculation rule includes the selection of categories included in the calculation, and wherein the categories and calculation rules assigned to the selection are called from a database.

16. The method as claimed in claim 15, wherein the categories in the database are assigned to treatment objectives and only the categories relevant to the respective treatment objective are offered for selection.

17. The method as claimed in claim 15, wherein the selection of the calculation rule and of the associated categories is carried out by customary computer input mechanisms.

33. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein cost proportions and key variables relating to the selected therapy are called from a database and displayed for selection in an automated fashion.

34. The method as claimed in claim 15, wherein the selection of the calculation rule and of the associated categories is carried out by at least one of clicking on a mouse and by use of drag and drop.

38. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the calculation rule is provided in a form editable by the user and wherein a calculation rule, at least one of newly created and modified by the user, is added to the database.

39. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the second data processing station is configured for the automated recording and transmission of the second numerical measures describing the success of treatment to the first data processing station.

40. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the recording of the second numerical measures describing the success of treatment at least one of is brought about by the first data processing station and takes place at predefinable time intervals.

42. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein at least one of the second numerical measures are recorded using a device connected to the second data processing station.

46. A system for carrying out the method of claim 9, comprising:

a first data processing station having a first module for defining the treatment objective, for providing the calculation rule and for automated execution of the calculation with reference to at least one of transmitted and stored numerical measures, wherein the first module is connected, for provisioning of the calculation rule, to a database containing calculation rules assigned to different therapies and treatment objectives; and

a second data processing station, connected to the first data processing station at least temporarily via a network and including a second module for the automatic recording and transmission of numerical measures to the first module of the first data processing station at predefinable times.

49. The system as claimed in claim 46, wherein the second data processing station is connected, via at least one interface, to a device for measuring the numerical measures.

28. A system for carrying out a method for measuring the success of treatment of a medical therapy, comprising:

a first data processing station having a first module for defining a treatment objective, for providing a calculation rule and for automated execution of a calculation with reference to at least one of transmitted and stored numerical measures, wherein the first module is connected, for provisioning of the calculation rule, to a database containing calculation rules assigned to different therapies and treatment objectives; and

a second data processing station, connected to the first data processing station at least temporarily via a network and including a second module for the automatic recording and transmission of numerical measures to the first module of the first data processing station at predefinable times.

29. The system as claimed in claim 28, wherein the second data processing station is connected, via at least one interface, to a device for measuring the numerical measures.