Preferred life mortality systems and methods

• US 20030236685A1
• Filed: 06/19/2002
• Published: 12/25/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 06/19/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Employers Fire Insurance Company (General Electric Company)
• Original Assignee: Employers Fire Insurance Company (General Electric Company)
• Inventors: Thomas, Charles, Damodarasamy, Sampath, Buckner, Robert
• Application Number:
  US10/174,643
• Publication Number:
  US 20030236685A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/4
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/08 Insurance

Abstract

The invention provides systems and methods for determining preferred life mortality analyses. Mortality data is electronically synthesized from a plurality of insurance carriers. A data engine processes the mortality data and synthesizes benchmark data to present the analyses, preferably in graphical form such as a data cube. User inputs at remote computers provide access to secure data in the database; these inputs may request the analyses relative to one or more preferred life risk scenarios, such as age, height, weight, gender, blood pressure, cholesterol, familial cancer history, familiar history of heart attack, familial history of stroke, smoker or non-smoker status, and smoking history. The analyses may assist in assessing appropriate monetary reserves for an insurance carrier, and/or pricing for insurance products.

Claims

1. A process for determining preferred life mortality, comprising the steps of:

electronically synthesizing mortality data from a plurality of insurance carriers; and

automatically generating one or more interactive analyses of the mortality data in response to user inputs defining one or more preferred life risk scenarios.

2. A process of claim 1, the step of synthesizing mortality data comprising synthesizing information of multiple deaths or prior insured over a period of time.

3. A process of claim 2, the period of time comprising a plurality of years.

4. A process of claim 1, further comprising the step of electronically assessing adequacy of pricing for at least one insurance policy of at least one of the insurance carriers, based on the analyses.

5. A process of claim 1, further comprising the step of electronically assessing adequacy of monetary reserves of one of the insurance carriers, based on the analyses.

6. A process of claim 5, further comprising reporting the adequacy of the monetary reserves to at least one regulatory body.

7. A process of claim 5, the step of electronically assessing comprising synthesizing portfolio data from the one insurance carrier, the portfolio data comprising data of preferred risks.

8. A process of claim 1, the step of automatically generating comprising transforming the analyses into a data cube.

9. A process of claim 1, the step of automatically generating comprising graphically showing one or more of mortality, persistence and morbidity data based on the life risk scenarios.

10. A process of claim 9, the step of graphically showing comprising displaying a table of the analyses functionally dependent upon two of the life risk scenarios.

11. A process of claim 10, further comprising regenerating the table functionally dependent upon another two of the life risk scenarios in response to user inputs indicating the two life risk scenarios.

12. A process of claim 1, the step of automatically generating comprising generating the analyses based upon the life risk scenarios selected from the group consisting essentially of age, height, weight, gender, blood pressure, cholesterol, familial cancer history, familial history of heart attack, familial history of stroke, smoker or non-smoker status, and smoking history.

13. A process of claim 1, the step of automatically generating comprising synthesizing one or more benchmark tables to produce the analyses.

14. A process of claim 13, the step of synthesizing comprising synthesizing one or more of a 1975-1980 SOA mortality table, a 1980 CSO valuation table and a foreign actuarial table.

15. A process of claim 1, further comprising a step of electronically inputting policy information from the plurality of insurance carriers to a secure database.

16. A process of claim 15, the step of inputting comprising submitting the policy information periodically in bulk to the secure database.

17. A process of claim 15, the step of inputting comprising utilizing a network between the plurality of insurance carriers and the secure database.

18. A process of claim 1, the step of automatically generating one or more analyses comprising generating a comparison between at least two of the insurance carriers.

19. A process of claim 1, the step of automatically generating one or more analyses comprising generating a comparison between plan type having a duration over a term of years.

20. A process of claim 1, further comprising the steps of (a) automatically generating one or more client files in response to automatic download of the mortality data, (b) automatically converting the files according to business rules to ensure that the mortality data is uncorrupted and uniformly formatted, (c) automatically mapping policy-level demographic data into exposure calculations, and (d) transforming mapped exposure calculations into a data cube.

21. A process of claim 1, the step of automatically generating comprising the step of generating the analyses relative to one or more of study calendar year, study period, gender, issue age, type of underwriting, plan code, generic mortality code, policy duration, issued amount, benefit amount, active and inactive policies, start date of exposure, end date of exposure, end date of policy exposure, partial duration of calendar year, and active policy exposure calculations.

22. A process of claim 1, the step of automatically generating one or more analyses comprises presenting one or more of:

exposure, in years;

expected mortality based upon (exposure)×

(mortality rate);

variance based upon (exposure)×

(mortality rate)×

(1-mortality rate); and

a ratio of actual mortality versus expected mortality.

23. A system for determining preferred life mortality, comprising:

a secure database for storing policy-level demographic data of individual insured lives, the data deriving from two or more insurance carriers and being normalized to one or more classifications of risk; and

a software application for synthesizing the data to generate one or more analyses of the data in response to user inputs at a computer networked with the secure database.

24. A system of claim 23, the user inputs comprising one or more preferred life risk scenarios.

25. A system of claim 24, the user inputs comprising two preferred life risk scenarios selected from the group consisting essentially of age, height, weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, familial cancer history, familial history of heart attack, gender, familial history of stroke, smoker or non-smoker status, and smoking history.

26. A system of claim 23, the secure database storing industry standard benchmark tables, the software application generating the analyses based in part on the tables.

27. A system of claim 26, the benchmark tables comprising one or more of a 1975-1980 SOA mortality table, a 1980 CSO valuation table and a foreign actuarial table.

28. A system of claim 23, further comprising a web platform for accessing the secure database through the Internet, the web platform presenting the analyses to the computer connected with the Internet in response to the user inputs at the computer.

29. A system of claim 23, the application software comprising analytical tools for generating a graphical user interface presenting the analyses.

30. A system of claim 29, the analytical tools generating a data cube of the analyses.

31. A system of claim 23, further comprising a data flow engine operatively coupled with the secure database to facilitate automatic download of the policy-level demographic data, from the plurality of insurance carriers, to the secure database.

32. A system of claim 31, the data flow engine having (a) means for generating one or more client files in response to automatic download of the policy-level demographic data, (b) means for converting the files according to business rules to ensure that the policy-level demographic data is uncorrupted and uniformly formatted, (c) means for mapping policy-level demographic data into exposure calculations, and (d) means for transforming mapped exposure calculations into a data cube of the analyses.

33. A system of claim 23, further comprising means for generating the analyses relative to one or more of study calendar year, study period, gender, issue age, type of underwriting, plan code, generic mortality code, policy duration, issued amount, benefit amount, active and inactive policies, start date of exposure, end date of exposure, end date of policy exposure, partial duration of calendar year, and active policy exposure calculations.

34. A system of claim 23, further comprising means for generating the analyses by presenting one or more of:

exposure, in years;

expected mortality based upon (exposure)×

(mortality rate);

variance based upon (exposure)×

(mortality rate)×

(1-mortality rate); and

a ratio of actual mortality versus expected mortality.

35. An interactive system for presenting synthesized preferred life mortality data to computers networked thereto, comprising:

means for inputting and storing mortality data from a plurality of insurance carriers; and

means for processing the data with one or more actuarial tables to interactively and graphically generate analyses relative to user selected life risk scenarios.

36. A system of claim 35, the life risk scenarios selected from the group consisting essentially of age, height, weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, familial cancer history, familial history of heart attack, gender, familial history of stroke, smoker or non-smoker status, and smoking history, the actuarial tables comprising benchmark tables.