Method and system for online analytical processing for educational and other outcomes

• US 20030236796A1
• Filed: 04/04/2003
• Published: 12/25/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 04/04/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Spectrum K12 School Solutions, Inc. (MX Holdings One LLC)
• Original Assignee: Spectrum K12 School Solutions, Inc. (MX Holdings One LLC)
• Inventors: Easter, Clark, Jin, Michael
• Application Number:
  US10/406,246
• Publication Number:
  US 20030236796A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 5/00 Electrically-operated educational appliances working with questions and answers G09B7/00; simulators G09B9/00; advertising or displaying in general G09F
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/00 Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers mechanically operated G09B3/00; computing arrangements G06F

Abstract

A computerized method and system for analyzing data relating to a mandated program or an individualized instructional program. The method includes receiving a query, accessing a repository of data relating to the mandated program; and identifying data responsive to the query. The system includes: a network; a terminal coupled to the network; and a server coupled to the network that comprises a program that receives a query, accesses a repository of data relating to the mandated program; and identifies data responsive to the query. The data includes special education-related data such as tenth suspension and related meeting data, annual meeting status data, reevaluation meeting status data, referral processing status data, gap analysis data, individual education plan implementation delay data, drop out and other exit reason data, individual education plan assessment completion status data, and least restrictive environment data.

Claims

1. A method for analyzing data relating to at least one mandated program, the method comprising:

receiving a query;

accessing a repository of data relating to the mandated program; and

identifying data responsive to the query.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the mandated program includes education requirements.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the mandated program includes special education requirements.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein receiving a query includes:

receiving a request for data meeting criteria for determining compliance with the at least one mandated program.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein receiving a request for data meeting criteria for determining compliance with the mandated program includes:

determining whether at least one triggering event has occurred within a designated time period.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the at least one triggering event comprises at least one selected from a group consisting of:

a suspension for an individual;

an 11^th suspension for an individual; and

an individual education plan meeting.

10. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

if the at least one triggering event has occurred, designating a status for at least one additional action event.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein designating a status for the at least one additional action event comprises:

determining whether at least one triggering event occurred for at least one individual;

determining whether a manifestation meeting was held for the at least one individual; and

determining whether the at least one additional action event was held before the at least one triggering event.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the at least one triggering event comprises at least one selected from a group consisting of:

a suspension for the at least one individual; and

an 11^th suspension for the at least one individual.

13. The method of claim 10, wherein the additional action event includes at least one selected from a group consisting of:

at least one manifestation meeting;

at least one functional behavior analysis; and

at least one behavior intervention plan.

14. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

if at least one triggering event has occurred, designating a status for at least one annual meeting.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein designating a status for at least one annual meeting further comprises:

identifying any previous meetings for at least one individual;

identifying any initial meetings for the at least one individual;

identifying any other triggering events for the at least one individual; and

identifying any relevant triggering events for the at least one individual.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the triggering events are events that have created a future legal obligation to perform at least one additional action.

17. The method of claim 9, further comprising:

if at least one triggering event has occurred, designating a status for at least one reevaluation meeting.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein designating a status for at least one reevaluation meeting further comprises:

identifying any previous meetings for at least one individual;

identifying any initial meetings for the at least one individual;

identifying any other trigger events for the at least one individual; and

identifying any relevant trigger events for the at least one individual.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the triggering events are events that have created a future legal obligation to perform at least one additional action.

20. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

if at least one triggering event has occurred, designating a status for at least one referral event.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein designating a status for at least one referral event further comprises:

identifying any previous referral events for at least one individual;

determining whether at least one eligibility meeting was due by the end of a current month for the at least one individual;

determining whether at least one eligibility meeting was held during the current month for the at least one individual; and

determining whether at least one eligibility meeting was held more than a specified time after any previous referral events for the at least one individual.

22. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

if the at least one triggering event occurred, designating a status for at least one individual education plan implementation.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein designating a status for at least one individual education plan implementation further comprises:

determining whether an individual education plan has an actual start date; and

determining whether the actual start date was before an individual education plan due date.

24. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

if a triggering event occurred, designating at least one reason for exiting a special education program.

25. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

if a triggering event occurred, designating a status for at least one assessment completion.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein designating a status for at least one assessment completion further comprises:

identifying at least one assessment completion due;

determining whether the assessment completion has an actual review date; and

determining whether the actual review date is before an assessment completion due date.

27. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

if a triggering event has occurred, determining a least restrictive environment for at least one individual.

28. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

if a triggering event has occurred, determining whether at least one student has left a special education program.

29. The method of claim 1, wherein the repository of data includes a plurality of event data, each of the plurality of event data having an associated date.

30. The method of claim 10, wherein determining whether a triggering event has occurred includes:

identifying event data from the plurality of data within a selected time period; and

determining whether each of the identified event data comprises a triggering event; and

setting at least one appropriate due date for future event obligations.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein the selected time period comprises at least one selected from a group consisting of:

a year; and

a month.

32. The method of claim 30, wherein identifying event data and determining whether each of the identified event data comprises a triggering event is repeated for a plurality of selected time periods.

33. The method of claim 8, wherein data related to the special education requirements is at least one selected from a group consisting of:

tenth suspension and related meeting data;

annual meeting status data;

reevaluation meeting status data;

referral processing status data;

gap analysis data;

individual education plan implementation delay data;

drop out and other exit reason data;

individual education plan assessment completion status data; and

least restrictive environment data.

34. The method of claim 33, wherein the annual meeting status data comprises at least one annual meeting delay reason selected from a group consisting of:

all reasons;

no reason specified;

not held;

parent requested delay;

provider late completing test;

school closed;

school scheduling error; and

waiting for ruling from an administrative law judge.

35. The method of claim 33, wherein the reevaluation meeting status data comprises at least one reevaluation meeting delay reason selected from a group consisting of:

all reasons;

no reason specified;

not held;

parent requested delay;

provider late completing test;

school closed;

school scheduling error; and

waiting for ruling from an administrative law judge.

36. The method of claim 33, wherein the referral processing status data comprises at least one referral delay reason selected from a group consisting of:

all reasons;

no reason specified;

not held;

parent requested delay;

provider late completing test;

school closed;

school scheduling error; and

waiting for ruling from administrative law judge.

37. The method of claim 33, wherein the service gap analysis data comprises at least one selected from a group consisting of:

expected sessions;

actual sessions; and

attempted sessions.

38. The method of claim 33, wherein the individual education plan implementation delay data comprises at least one delay reason selected from a group consisting of:

all reasons;

diligent efforts but no response from parents;

diligent efforts but parent failed to respond in a timely manner;

diligent efforts but parent and student whereabouts unknown;

due date too soon when student registered at school;

due date past when student registered at school;

failed to tell provider to start services;

lack of transportation;

late parent signature due to inadequate due diligence;

late parent signature due to initial refusal;

no parent surrogate available;

no reason specified;

non public placement transition;

not started;

parent permission refused;

parent requested delay until Head Start begins;

parent requested delay until new school year;

parent withdrew permission;

provider did not give assigned services;

student hospitalized;

student in treatment center;

student incarcerated;

student refused service;

TEP in effect during delay;

trouble assigning provider;

waiting for an administrative law judge ruling;

was not told student registered at school; and

weather delayed services.

39. The method of claim 33, wherein the individual education plan assessment completion status data comprises at least one delay reason selected from a group consisting of:

all delay reasons;

delay in assigning parent surrogate;

delayed because parent requested outside agency assessment;

delayed by need for supervisor'"'"'s approval;

diligent efforts but no response from parent;

diligent efforts but parent failed to respond in timely manner;

diligent efforts but parent and student whereabouts unknown;

failed to tell provider to test student;

late parent signature but inadequate due diligence;

late parent signature but initial refusal;

no reason specified;

not completed;

parent failed to bring student for testing;

parent permission refused;

parent requested rescheduling of individual education plan review meeting;

prior school failed to do testing;

provider did not complete on time;

provider didn'"'"'t file test on time;

provider not available in student'"'"'s language;

student hospitalized;

student in treatment center;

student incarcerated;

student refuses to take test;

student requested break in testing session;

student unavailable for testing;

student under medical care;

supplemental aids not immediately available;

trouble assigning provider;

waiting for administrative law judge ruling;

was not told student had registered at school; and

weather delayed testing.

40. The method of claim 8, wherein data related to the special education requirements is at least one selected from a group consisting:

all disability data;

autism data;

deaf data;

deaf-blindness data;

developmental delay data;

emotional disturbance data;

hearing impaired data;

mental retardation data;

multiple disability data;

orthopedic impairment data;

health impairment data;

specific learning disability data;

speech impaired data;

language impaired data;

student in need of assessment data;

traumatic brain injury data; and

visual impairment data.

2. A method for analyzing data relating to at least one individualized instructional program, the method comprising:

receiving a query;

accessing a repository of data relating to the individualized instructional program; and

identifying data responsive to the query.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the individualized instructional program is at least one of a group consisting of:

a special education program;

a program to prevent discrimination against a disabled student;

an English as a second language program;

an at risk program; and

a gifted and talented program.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein identifying data responsive to the query further comprises drilling down in the data to look at more detailed data.

41. A computer program product comprising a computer usable medium having control logic stored therein for causing a computer to analyze data relating to a mandated program, the control logic comprising:

first computer readable program means for receiving a query;

second computer readable program means for accessing a repository of data relating to the mandated program; and

third computer readable program means for identifying data responsive to the query.

42. A computerized system for analyzing data relating to a mandated program, comprising:

a network;

at least one terminal coupled to the network;

at least one server coupled to the network; and

wherein the at least one server comprises a program that receives a query;

accesses a repository of data relating to the mandated program; and

identified data responsive to the query.