Channel management in adaptive hopping schemes

• US 20040013168A1
• Filed: 02/20/2003
• Published: 01/22/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 02/21/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Toshiba Corporation
• Original Assignee: Toshiba Corporation
• Inventors: Haines, Russell John, Fitton, Michael Philip, Farnham, Timothy David
• Application Number:
  US10/368,490
• Publication Number:
  US 20040013168A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 375/132
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 1/715 Interference-related aspects
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 2001/7154 with means for preventing interference
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 2201/709709 Methods of preventing interference

Abstract

An adaptive frequency hopping scheme for use in a predetermined spectrum of communication channels, comprising the steps of setting a monitoring period for each channel while it is in use, detecting the number of damaged or lost transmissions within the monitoring period, marking the channel as “bad” if the detected number is greater than a first predetermined number and then using an alternative channel of the spectrum.

Claims

1. An adaptive frequency hopping scheme for use in a predetermined spectrum of communication channels, comprising the steps of setting a monitoring period for each channel while it is in use, detecting the number of damaged or lost transmissions within the monitoring period, marking the channel as “

bad”

if the detected number is greater than a first predetermined number and then using an alternative channel of the spectrum.

2. An adaptive frequency hopping scheme according to claim 1 in which a channel is marked “

bad”

as soon as the predetermined number of damaged or lost transmissions has been exceeded.

3. An adaptive frequency hopping scheme according to claim 1 or claim 2 in which a channel which has been marked as “

bad”

is reinstated for use after a predetermined waiting period.

4. An adaptive frequency hopping scheme according to claim 3 in which a reinstated channel is monitored in accordance with stricter criteria so that it will be marked as “

bad”

again more quickly unless its performance has improved.

5. An adaptive frequency hopping scheme according to claim 4 in which a reinstated channel is marked as bad as soon as the number of damaged or lost transmissions exceeds a second predetermined number which is less than the first predetermined number.

6. An adaptive frequency hopping scheme according to claim 4 or claim 5 in which the monitoring period is shortened for a reinstated channel.

7. An adaptive frequency hopping scheme according to any one of claims 4 or claim 6 in which the waiting period is progressively increased for a channel which is repeatedly marked as bad.

8. An adaptive frequency hopping scheme according to any one of claims 3 to 7 in which dummy transmissions are made on each “

bad”

channel during the waiting period in order to determine whether its performance is satisfactory.