Monitoring of concrete vessels and structures

• US 20040035218A1
• Filed: 07/30/2003
• Published: 02/26/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 09/25/2000
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Pure Technologies Limited (Xylem, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Pure Technologies Limited (Xylem, Inc.)
• Inventors: Paulson, Peter O.
• Application Number:
  US10/380,676
• Publication Number:
  US 20040035218A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 73/803
• CPC Class Codes: G01H 1/00 Measuring characteristics of vibrations in solids by using direct conduction to the detector G01H9/00, G01H11/00 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2291/0258 Structural degradation, e.g. fatigue of composites, ageing of oils
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 29/045 by imparting shocks to the workpiece and detecting the vibrations or the acoustic waves caused by the shocks measuring resonant frequency G01H13/00; measuring strength properties by application of mechanical stress G01N3/00
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 29/14 using acoustic emission techniques echo of particles G01N29/046; measuring mechanical vibrations or acoustic waves in solids in general G01H1/00
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 29/42 by frequency filtering or by tuning to resonant frequency
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 29/4436 with a reference signal amplitude comparison G01N29/48
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 29/46 by spectral analysis, e.g. Fourier analysis or wavelet analysis spectral signal processing per se G06F17/14
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 33/383 Concrete, cement

Abstract

Microcracking in concrete structures is monitored acoustically. The resulting signals can be used to determine corrosion of metal reinforcing wires or rods, or damage occurring from accident or seismic events.

Claims

1. A method of inspection of concrete structures which comprises:

a) conducting a base test by loading the structure with a base load which is considerably in excess of the load to which the structure is exposed in normal use,

b) removing the base load,

c) subsequently conducting at least one further test by loading the structure with a test load equal to or less than the base load, and exerting loading in approximately the same location as the test load;

d) noting acoustic signals (if any) which are detected by at least one sensor in contact with the structure while the structure is loaded with the test load.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1, where the acoustic signals are detected at one or more frequencies in the range of 2 KHz to 12 KHz.

3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, in which the acoustic signals are detected by a plurality of sensors, and the origin of at least some such signals is determined by comparing the signals detected at each sensor.

11. A method as claimed in any of claims 1-3, in which, if acoustic events are noted at the test load, then such signals are monitored and a determination is made as to how long it takes for the rate of such signals to decline by one-half.

13. A method as claimed in any of claims 1-12, in which the structure is a pressure vessel, and the loading is changed by changing the pressure in the vessel.

4. A method of inspecting concrete structures which comprises

(a) loading the structure to a loading where microcracking occurs,

(b) determining the acoustic signature acoustic events arising from of microcracking in the structure

(c) subsequently monitoring the structure for acoustic events having that acoustic signature.

5. A method as claimed in claim 4, in which the acoustic signature comprises a frequency or range of frequencies within the range 2 KHz to 12 KHz which at which acoustic events occur in the concrete of the particular structure as a result of microcracking.

6. A method as claimed in claim 4 or 5 in which the acoustic signature comprises the energy spectra of acoustic events arising from microcracking.

7. A method as claimed in claim 4 or 5 in which the acoustic signature comprises the duration of acoustic events arising from microcracking.

12. A method as claimed in any of claims 4-7, in which acoustic events bearing the acoustic signature of microcracking are monitored and a determination is made as to how long it takes for the rate of such signals to decline by one-half.

8. A method of inspection of structures which comprises,

a) positioning at least three acoustic sensors in locations to sense acoustic waves within the structure,

b) monitoring the output of such sensors,

c) if and when such sensors detect signals characteristic of concrete microcracking, determining the probable origin of such signals, and

d) inspecting the structure in the vicinity of the probable origin for evidence of damage.

9. A method of inspection of A concrete structure which is suspected to be damaged which comprises

(a) placing two acoustic sensors to monitor acoustic events occurring in the concrete of the structure, one such acoustic sensor being placed proximate to the suspected damaged area and one acoustic sensor being placed remote from the suspected damaged area in an area believed to be undamaged

(b) loading the structure equally at the locations of the two sensors,

(c) gradually increasing the loading equally at the locations of the two sensors, and

(d) noting whether acoustic events are detected by the sensor proximate the suspected damaged area at a loading at which similar acoustic events are not detected at the sensor remote from the suspected damaged area.

10. A method as claimed in claim 9, in which, if the sensed acoustic events from the sensor proximate the suspected damaged location do not decrease by half within 15 minutes at the loading at which they are first detected, the loading is decreased.