Digital spread spectrum methods and apparatus for testing aircraft wiring

• US 20040039976A1
• Filed: 04/23/2003
• Published: 02/26/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 04/23/2002
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: LiveWire Innovation Inc.
• Original Assignee: Utah State University
• Inventors: Gunther, Jacob, Furse, Cynthia, Dosibhatla, Deekshit
• Granted Patent: US 7,069,163 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 714/742
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/008 on air- or spacecraft, railway rolling stock or sea-going vessels
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/08 Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/088 Aspects of digital computing

Abstract

A system and method that utilizes direct sequence spread spectrum signal (DSSS) encoding to enable testing of a live wire, wherein an original data signal is modified and then transmitted along the wire, and a reflected signal is collected and analyzed using correlation techniques to determine characteristics of the live wire, including the location of a fault.

Claims

1. A method of determining impedance of a wire under test utilizing direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS) techniques, said method comprising the steps of:

(1) coupling the DSSS wire testing system to a connecting end of the wire under test;

(2) obtaining a pseudo-random noise (PN) code;

(3) multiplying a test signal by the PN code;

(4) transmitting the multiplied test signal from the DSSS wire testing system to the wire under test;

(5) receiving a reflected multiplied test signal from the wire under test; and

(6) determining a length of the wire under test from the reflected multiplied test signal.

2. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein the step of determining a length of the wire under test from the reflected multiplied test signal further comprises the step of utilizing a propagation delay measured via the PN code.

3. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein the method further comprises the step of

4. A method of using spread spectrum techniques for wire testing of a live wire, said method comprising the steps of:

(1) generating a code;

(2) modifying a test signal using the code;

(3) transmitting the modified test signal on the live wire, wherein the modified test signal has a signal strength that is comparable to noise on the live wire;

(4) measuring a propagation delay of the modified test signal via the code; and

(5) determining impedance of the live wire.

5. The method as defined in claim 4 wherein the step of generating the code further comprises the step of generating a pseudo random code.

6. The method as defined in claim 4 wherein the step of modifying the test signal using the code further comprises the step of multiplying the test signal by the code.

7. The method as defined in claim 4 wherein the step of modifying the test signal using the code further comprises the step of adding the code to the test signal.

8. The method as defined in claim 4 wherein the step of determining impedance of the live wire further comprises the step of using a reflectometry method.

9. The method as defined in claim 8 wherein the step of using a reflectometry method further comprises the step of using frequency domain reflectometry.

10. The method as defined in claim 4 wherein the method further comprises the step of using correlation techniques.

11. The method as defined in claim 4 wherein the method further comprises the step of using direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS) to modify the test signal.

12. The method as defined in claim 11 wherein the method further comprises the step of modifying the test signal with the code, wherein the code has a higher bit rate than the test signal.

13. The method as defined in claim 12 wherein the method further comprises the step of transmitting the modified test signal using a digital modulation scheme.

14. The method as defined in claim 13 wherein the method further comprises the step of transmitting the modified test signal using a digital modulation scheme selected from the group of digital modulation schemes comprised of BPSK and QPSK.

15. The method as defined in claim 4 wherein the method further comprises the step of analyzing a reflected modified test signal to determine wire impedance.

16. The method as defined in claim 4 wherein the method further comprises the step of selecting the code to be independent of the test signal, thereby ignoring cross correlations of any signals and the code on the live wire.

17. The method as defined in claim 10 wherein the method further comprises the step of cross correlating the modified test signal and a reflected modified test signal, to thereby obtain a peak that corresponds to a delay of the modified test signal on the live wire.

18. The method as defined in claim 17 wherein the method further comprises the step of corresponding the delay of the modified test signal on the live wire to a location of a fault on the live wire.

19. The method as defined in claim 4 wherein the method further comprises the step of using a plurality of prime codes.

20. The method as defined in claim 19 wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

(1) modifying a first test signal with a first repeated code;

(2) transmitting the modified first test signal with the first repeated code;

(3) obtaining a first peak from a cross correlation of the modified first test signal, and a reflected modified first test signal;

(4) modifying a second test signal with a different repeated code;

(5) transmitting the modified second test signal with the different repeated code;

(6) obtaining a second peak from a cross correlation of the modified second test signal, and a reflected modified second test signal; and

(7) superpositioning the first peak and the second peak to obtain the length of the wire.

21. The method as defined in claim 20 wherein the first repeated code is of length M1.

22. The method as defined in claim 20 wherein the first repeated code is of length M2.

23. The method as defined in claim 4 wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

(1) passing the code through a low pass filter;

(2) mixing the filtered code with a test signal;

(3) providing delays in a cross correlation unit; and

(4) performing correlation for a plurality of sensors.

24. The method as defined in claim 4 wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

(1) using a plurality of different code having equal length; and

(2) changing a bit rate of the plurality of different codes to thereby perform a binary search method to determine length of the live wire.

25. The method as defined in claim 4 wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

(1) passing the code through a first matched filter;

(2) passing a reflected code through a second matched filter;

(3) determining a delay in response between the first matched filter and the second matched filter; and

(4) corresponding the delay to the length of the wire.

26. A method of using spread spectrum techniques for testing of a live wire, said method comprising the steps of:

(1) spreading out a test signal for transmission on a live wire such that the spread test signal is comparable in strength to noise on the live wire;

(2) transmitting the spread test signal on the live wire;

(3) measuring a propagation delay of the spread test signal; and

(4) determining impedance of the live wire.

27. The method as defined in claim 26 wherein the step of generating the code further comprises the step of generating a pseudo random code.

28. The method as defined in claim 26 wherein the step of modifying the test signal using the code further comprises the step of multiplying the test signal by the code.

29. The method as defined in claim 26 wherein the step of modifying the test signal using the code further comprises the step of adding the code to the test signal.

30. The method as defined in claim 26 wherein the step of determining impedance of the live wire further comprises the step of using a reflectometry method.

31. The method as defined in claim 30 wherein the step of using a reflectometry method further comprises the step of using frequency domain reflectometry.

32. The method as defined in claim 26 wherein the method further comprises the step of using correlation techniques.

33. The method as defined in claim 26 wherein the method further comprises the step of using direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS) to modify the test signal.

34. The method as defined in claim 33 wherein the method further comprises the step of modifying the test signal with the code, wherein the code has a higher bit rate than the test signal.

35. The method as defined in claim 34 wherein the method further comprises the step of transmitting the modified test signal using a digital modulation scheme.

36. The method as defined in claim 35 wherein the method further comprises the step of transmitting the modified test signal using a digital modulation scheme selected from the group of digital modulation schemes comprised of BPSK and QPSK.

37. The method as defined in claim 26 wherein the method further comprises the step of analyzing a reflected modified test signal to determine wire impedance.

38. The method as defined in claim 26 wherein the method further comprises the step of selecting the code to be independent of the test signal, thereby ignoring cross correlations of any signals and the code on the live wire.

39. The method as defined in claim 32 wherein the method further comprises the step of cross correlating the modified test signal and a reflected modified test signal, to thereby obtain a peak that corresponds to a delay of the modified test signal on the live wire.

40. The method as defined in claim 39 wherein the method further comprises the step of corresponding the delay of the modified test signal on the live wire to a location of a fault on the live wire.

41. The method as defined in claim 26 wherein the method further comprises the step of using a plurality of prime codes.

42. The method as defined in claim 41 wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

(1) modifying a first test signal with a first repeated code;

(2) transmitting the modified first test signal with the first repeated code;

(3) obtaining a first peak from a cross correlation of the modified first test signal, and a reflected modified first test signal;

(4) modifying a second test signal with a different repeated code;

(5) transmitting the modified second test signal with the different repeated code;

(6) obtaining a second peak from a cross correlation of the modified second test signal, and a reflected modified second test signal; and

(7) superpositioning the first peak and the second peak to obtain the length of the wire.

43. The method as defined in claim 42 wherein the first repeated code is of length M1.

44. The method as defined in claim 42 wherein the first repeated code is of length M2.

45. The method as defined in claim 26 wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

(1) passing the code through a low pass filter;

(2) mixing the filtered code with a test signal;

(3) providing delays in a cross correlation unit; and

(4) performing correlation for a plurality of sensors.

46. The method as defined in claim 26 wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

(1) using a plurality of different code having equal length; and

(2) changing a bit rate of the plurality of different codes to thereby perform a binary search method to determine length of the live wire.

47. The method as defined in claim 26 wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

(1) passing the code through a first matched filter;

(2) passing a reflected code through a second matched filter;

(3) determining a delay in response between the first matched filter and the second matched filter; and

(4) corresponding the delay to the length of the wire.