Intelligent document management system

• US 20040049490A1
• Filed: 09/09/2003
• Published: 03/11/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 09/09/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Epic Systems Corporation
• Original Assignee: Epic Systems Corporation
• Inventors: Milov, David E.
• Application Number:
  US10/658,878
• Publication Number:
  US 20040049490A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 707/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/93 Document management systems

Abstract

This system and method of the present invention is directed to a process of creating and using a medical database whereby the contents have been validated through a peer review process to produce an extensive searchable base of protocols and links to literature references by a given medical topic. The database is populated and indexed with protocols for both diagnosis and treatments. The protocols are created and reviewed with research evidence, which provides for establishing confidence levels. It is then subsequently categorized and indexed into a database system. This information can then be subsequently accessed by keywords by practitioners from the patient point of care location.

Claims

1. A computer implemented medical database comprising:

a plurality of medical documents, each of said plurality of documents having protocol information associated therewith; and

an evidence level associated with each of said plurality of documents, said evidence level being a measurement of the validity of the protocol information for a document.

2. A computer implemented medical database according to claim 1, wherein:

the evidence level is based upon a plurality of factors, said factors including one or more of the following;

controlled study data,

cross-over trial data, and

placebo study data, and

common practice data.

3. A computer implemented medical database according to claim 2, wherein:

each evidence level is determined by a consensus among peers.

4. A computer implemented medical database according to claim 3, wherein:

each evidence level equals a percentage from 0% to 100%.

5. A computer implemented medical database according to claim 4, further including links to said protocol information associated with each of said plurality of documents.

6. A computer implemented medical database according to claim 5, further including one or more concept unique identifiers associated with each of said plurality of documents.

7. A computer implemented medical database according to claim 6, further including one or more evaluation and management codes associated with each of said plurality of documents.

8. A computer implemented medical database according to claim 7, further including:

a computer-implemented user interface configured to access the computer implemented medical database, and

computer program coding for each of said plurality of documents, said computer program coding being configured to enable presentation of the document using the computer implemented user interface.

9. A computer implemented medical database according to claim 8, further including:

one or more templates, each of said one or more templates being configured for entry of the each of said plurality of medical documents, concept unique identifiers, and evaluation and management codes in the database.

10. A computer implemented medical database according to claim 9, further including:

a document type identifier associated with each of said plurality of medical documents.

11. A computer implemented medical database according to claim 10, wherein the documents type identifier includes an indication of age for an intended reader of one or more of said plurality of documents.

12. A method for creating a medical database, said method comprising steps of:

assigning a topic;

writing a document on the topic;

submitting the document to peers for review and assignment of an evidence level; and

entering the document and the assigned evidence level for the document in a computer accessible database.

13. The method according to claim 12, said method further wherein the assigned evidence level is based upon a plurality of factors, said factors including one or more of the following:

controlled study data,

cross-over trial data, and

placebo study data, and

common practice data.

14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the assigned evidence level is determined by a consensus among peers.

15. The method according to claim 14, said method further including steps of assigning a concept unique identifier with the document and entering the assigned concept unique identifier in the database.

16. The method according to claim 15, said method further including steps of assigning a evaluation and management code with the document and entering the assigned evaluation and management code in the database.

17. The method according to claim 16, said method further including steps of assigning a critical data element with the document and entering the assigned critical data element in the database.

18. The method according to claim 17, said method further including steps encoding the document into a format compatible with a user interface.

19. A computer implemented medical database comprising a database means for storing a plurality of medical documents, associated protocol information, and associated evidence levels, each of said plurality of documents having protocol information associated therewith, and each of said plurality of documents having an evidence level associated therewith.

20. A computer implemented medical database according to claim 19, further comprising a template for entering the plurality of medical documents, associated protocol information, and associated evidence levels into the database.