Assessment of capability of computing environment to meet an uptime criteria

• US 20040054709A1
• Filed: 09/13/2002
• Published: 03/18/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 09/13/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Electronic Data Systems Corporation (Perspecta, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Electronic Data Systems Corporation (Perspecta, Inc.)
• Inventors: Bess, Charles E.
• Application Number:
  US10/243,862
• Publication Number:
  US 20040054709A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/200
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 99/00 Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass

Abstract

A technique for addressing whether a computing environment is likely to meet an uptime criteria involves evaluating plural predetermined criteria, identifying an action based on the evaluation, and then implementing the action. A variation involves evaluating the predetermined criteria, and then generating a report with an assessment about the capability of the environment to meet the uptime criteria. Still another variation involves evaluating the predetermined criteria, determining a respective numerical value for each criteria, applying weights to the numerical values, and adding up at least some of the weighted values in order to obtain an assessment value.

Claims

1. A method comprising the steps of:

evaluating each of a plurality of predetermined criteria relating to capability for a computing environment to meet a specified uptime criteria;

identifying as a function of said evaluating step an action intended to improve said capability for said computing environment to meet said uptime criteria; and

implementing said action.

2. A method according to claim 1, including the steps of:

determining as part of said evaluating step a respective numerical value for each said predetermined criteria;

applying to each said numerical value a respective predetermined weight to obtain a respective weighted value; and

calculating an assessment result that includes at least one assessment value which is a function of at least two of said weighted values.

3. A method according to claim 2,

wherein said predetermined criteria are grouped into a plurality of mutually exclusive groups corresponding to respective different categories which each relate to capability for a computing environment to meet a specified uptime criteria;

and

wherein said calculating step is carried out in a manner so that said assessment result includes a plurality of said assessment values that each correspond to a respective said category.

4. A method according to claim 3, including the step of selecting as each said category one of:

development environment, system environment, system controls, maintenance testing, user acceptance testing, implementation, and post implementation review.

5. A method according to claim 1, including the steps of:

generating a report containing an assessment result which is a function of information developed during said evaluating step and which represents an assessed capability for the computing environment to meet the specified uptime criteria; and

carrying out said identifying step on the basis of said assessment result in said report.

6. A method comprising the steps of:

evaluating each of a plurality of predetermined criteria relating to capability for a computing environment to meet a specified uptime criteria; and

generating a report containing an assessment result which is a function of information developed during said evaluating step and which represents an assessed capability for the computing environment to meet the specified uptime criteria.

7. A method according to claim 6,

wherein said evaluating step includes the step of determining a respective numerical value for each said predetermined criteria;

and

wherein said generating step includes the steps of;

introducing said numerical values into a computer program which includes a plurality of predetermined weights that each correspond to a respective said predetermined criteria;

causing said computer program to apply each said weight to the corresponding numerical value to obtain a plurality of weighted values;

causing said computer program to calculate said assessment result in a manner so that said assessment result includes at least one assessment value which is a function of at least two of said weighted values; and

causing said computer program to prepare said report containing said assessment result.

8. A method according to claim 7,

wherein said predetermined criteria are grouped into a plurality of mutually exclusive groups corresponding to respective different categories which each relate to capability for a computing environment to meet a specified uptime criteria;

and

wherein said step of causing said computer program to calculate said assessment result is carried out in a manner so that said assessment result includes a plurality of said assessment values that each correspond to a respective said category.

9. A method according to claim 8, including the step of selecting as each said category one of:

development environment, system environment, system controls, maintenance testing, user acceptance testing, implementation, and post implementation review.

10. A method according to claim 6, including the steps of:

identifying on the basis of said assessment result in said report an action intended to improve said capability for said computing environment to meet said uptime criteria; and

implementing said action.

11. A method comprising the steps of:

evaluating each of a plurality of predetermined criteria relating to capability for a computing environment to meet a specified uptime criteria, said evaluating step including the step of determining a respective numerical value for each said predetermined criteria;

introducing said numerical values into a computer program which includes a plurality of predetermined weights that each correspond to a respective said predetermined criteria;

causing said computer program to apply each said weight to the corresponding numerical value to obtain a plurality of weighted values; and

causing said computer program to calculate an assessment result that includes at least one assessment value which is a function of at least two of said weighted values.

12. A method according to claim 11, including the steps of:

identifying as a function of said evaluating step an action intended to improve said capability for said computing environment to meet said uptime criteria; and

implementing said action.

13. A method according to claim 11,

wherein said predetermined criteria are grouped into a plurality of mutually exclusive groups corresponding to respective different categories which each relate to capability for a computing environment to meet a specified uptime criteria;

and

wherein said calculating step is carried out in a manner so that said assessment result includes a plurality of said assessment values that each correspond to a respective said category.

14. A method according to claim 13, including the step of selecting as each said category one of:

development environment, system environment, system controls, maintenance testing, user acceptance testing, implementation, and post implementation review.

15. A method according to claim 11, including the step of causing said computer program to generate a report which includes said assessment result.

16. A computer-readable medium encoded with a computer program which is operable when executed to:

accept as input a plurality of numerical values that were each determined by evaluating a respective one of a plurality of predetermined criteria relating to capability for a computing environment to meet a specified uptime criteria;

maintain a plurality of predetermined weights which each correspond to a respective said predetermined criteria;

apply said predetermined weights to the corresponding numerical values to obtain a plurality of weighted values; and

calculate an assessment result having at least one assessment value which is a function of at least two of said weighted values.

17. A method according to claim 16,

wherein said predetermined criteria are grouped into a plurality of mutually exclusive groups corresponding to respective different categories which each relate to capability for a computing environment to meet a specified uptime criteria;

and

wherein said computer program is operable when executed to carry out said calculating step in a manner so that said assessment result includes a plurality of said assessment values that each correspond to a respective said category.

18. A method according to claim 17, wherein each said category is one of:

development environment, system environment, system controls, maintenance testing, user acceptance testing, implementation, and post implementation review.

19. A method according to claim 16, wherein said computer program is operable when executed to generate a report which includes said assessment result.