Motor vehicle steering system having a yaw rate controller

• US 20040070268A1
• Filed: 10/09/2003
• Published: 04/15/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 08/23/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
• Original Assignee: Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
• Inventors: Baumgarten, Goetz
• Application Number:
  US10/681,313
• Publication Number:
  US 20040070268A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 303/146
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 2260/02 Active Steering, Steer-by-Wire
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 2260/024 Yawing moment compensation during mu-split braking
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 8/1755 Brake regulation specially adapted to control the stability of the vehicle, e.g. taking into account yaw rate or transverse acceleration in a curve road vehicle drive control systems for control of driving stability otherwise than by controlling a particular sub-unit B60W30/02
• CPC Class Codes: B62D 6/003 in order to control vehicle yaw movement, i.e. around a vertical axis B62D6/007 takes precedence

Abstract

A motor vehicle steering system includes a yaw rate controller that continuously detects a yaw rate representing the vehicle yawing motion, forms a control signal as a function thereof, and causes a steering movement that counteracts the undesired yawing motion. The control signal is formed differently in the unbraked driving condition than when the vehicle is braked. In addition, the control signal in the case of a control intervention of a brake control system may be formed differently than when the vehicle is braked without such a control intervention. Preferably, the control signal which is determined from the deviation between a desired yaw rate value and the actual yaw rate value, in the case of a controlled braking operation, is formed by means of at least one other amplification factor (k_p) that differs from that which is used in the unbraked driving condition. In the deviation branch, in addition to the proportional fraction, an integral fraction may be provided whose amplification factor (k_I) in the case of a braking operation has a different value than in the unbraked driving condition.

Claims

1. A motor vehicle steering system having a yaw rate controller which continuously detects a yaw rate representing the vehicle yawing motion and forms a control signal as a function thereof, and which causes a steering movement which counteracts the undesired yawing motion, wherein the control signal is formed differently in an unbraked driving condition than when the vehicle is braked.

2. The motor vehicle steering system according to claim 1, wherein the control signal in the case of a control intervention of a brake control system is formed differently than when the vehicle is braked without such a control intervention.

3. The motor vehicle steering system according to claim 1, wherein:

the control signal is determined from the deviation between a desired yaw rate value and the actual yaw rate value; and

in the event of a controlled braking operation, the control signal is formed by means of at least one amplification factor that differs from an amplification factor that is used in the unbraked driving condition.

4. The motor vehicle steering system according to claim 3, comprising a deviation branch which generates the control signal that includes a proportional component and an integral component, the integral component having an amplification factor that has a different value in the case of a braking operation than in the unbraked driving condition.

5. The motor vehicle steering system according to claim 1, wherein the deviation branch or a return branch includes a filter whose operation is changed or activated in the case of a braking operation in contrast to the unbraked driving condition.

6. The motor vehicle according to claim 1, wherein a braking operation is detected based on one of activation of a vehicle brake light switch and pressure change in the hydraulic vehicle braking system.

7. A yaw rate control device, for controlling yawing movement of a vehicle, said yaw rate control device comprising:

means for providing a signal indicative of a desired yaw rate for said vehicle;

means for generating a signal indicative of an actual yaw rate for said vehicle;

comparison means for generating a deviation signal equal to the difference between said desired yaw rate signal and said actual yaw rate signal;

means for calculating a control signal for controlling vehicle steering as a function of said deviation signal, using at least one amplification factor; and

means for determining whether a vehicle operator is currently activating a vehicle braking operation;

wherein the at least one amplification factor has a value that varies as a function or whether or not a vehicle braking operation is currently activated.

8. The yaw rate control device according to claim 7, further comprising:

means for determining whether an automatic braking intervention is occurring;

wherein the value of the at least one amplification factor varies further as a function of whether an automatic braking intervention is currently occurring.

9. The yaw rate control device according to claim 7, wherein said means for calculating a control signal incorporates a proportional component that uses a first amplification factor for the proportional component.

10. The yaw rate control device according to claim 9, wherein said means for calculating a control signal incorporates an integral component that uses a second amplification factor for the integral component, the control signal being equal to the sum of the proportional and integral components.

11. A method for controlling yawing movement of a vehicle, comprising:

providing a signal indicative of a desired yaw rate for said vehicle;

generating a signal indicative of an actual yaw rate for said vehicle;

calculating a control signal as a function of a difference between said signals that are indicative of the desired yaw rate and the actual rate, using at least one amplification factor;

adjusting vehicle steering as a function of said control signal;

determining whether a vehicle operator is currently activating a vehicle braking operation; and

varying a value of said amplification factor as a function of whether or not a vehicle braking operation is currently activated.

12. The method according to claim 11, further comprising:

determining whether an automatic braking intervention is occurring;

wherein the value of the at least one amplification factor varies further as a function of whether an automatic braking intervention is currently occurring.

13. The method according to claim 11, wherein said control signal includes a proportional component that is calculated using a first amplification factor.

14. The method according to claim 13, wherein:

the control signal incorporates an integral component that is calculated using a second amplification factor; and

the control signal is equal to the sum of the proportional and integral components.