Strategic planning and valuation

• US 20040073442A1
• Filed: 05/21/2003
• Published: 04/15/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 10/11/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Accenture Global Services Limited (Accenture PLC)
• Original Assignee: Accenture Global Services Limited (Accenture PLC)
• Inventors: McCarthy, Brain F., Smythe, Stewart, Reilly, Stuart, Heyns, Herman R.
• Application Number:
  US10/444,021
• Publication Number:
  US 20040073442A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06375 Prediction of business process outcome or impact based on a proposed change
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06393 Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0224 based on user history
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0241 Advertisements
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 99/00 Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass

Abstract

A holistic method of developing a strategic planning solution for a business organization by taking into account a broad array of components within the enterprise planning process includes affirming strategic objectives and the nature of corporate relationship, developing valuation and analyzing driver sensitivities, developing a business model for the organization based upon strategic objectives and sensitivities, developing performance measures and performance indicators, defining desired changes to implement in the corporate planning and reporting processes based upon the desired changes, and reviewing management skills and reward structures and modifying the reward structures in order to implement the identified desired changes.

Claims

1. A holistic method of developing a strategic planning solution for a business organization by taking into account a broad array of components within the enterprise planning process, comprising:

affirming strategic objectives and nature of corporate relationships;

developing valuation and analyzing driver sensitivities;

based upon said strategic objectives and sensitivities, developing a business model;

based upon said business model, developing performance measures and key performance indicators;

based upon said performance measures and key performance indicators, defining desired changes to implement in corporate planning and reporting processes;

based upon said desired changes, defining changes to business unit planning and reporting processes; and

based upon said desired changes to said planning and reporting processes, and further based upon said strategic objectives, reviewing management skills and reward structures and modifying said reward structures.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

based upon said management skills and reward structures, and further based upon said desired changes to said planning and reporting processes, developing and agreeing system options.

3. The method of claim 2 further comprising:

based upon said strategic objectives and sensitivities, developing driver trees;

and wherein said performance measures and key performance indicators are further based upon said driver trees.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said defining desired changes to implement includes querying a computer database of historical financial data for a plurality of comparison companies to compare metrics of said companies and thereby evaluate a set of potential goals.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein said defining desired changes to implement includes:

prompting a user to input business data relating to the business organization into a computer;

presenting a list of possible business strategies to a user, and prompting the user to choose a selected strategy from among said possible business strategies;

based upon said business data received from said user and further based upon said selected business strategy, prompting said user to input additional data specific to said chosen strategy and to said business organization;

such that a user is guided through a series of questions specific to said chosen business strategy to assist the user in identifying key assumptions in evaluating said chosen business strategy.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein said querying a computer database includes selecting an industry from a list of industries, and then selecting financial data to review for at least one company from a presented list of companies within said selected industry.

7. A method of developing a strategic planning solution for use within a business organization, comprising:

identifying value drivers of said organization;

consolidating said identified value drivers into a value-tree model;

using said value-tree model, evaluating and selecting strategies;

establishing and embedding a supporting performance management framework into the organization to facilitate the implementation and delivery of said selected strategies.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein said performance management framework facilitates said business organization in understanding what business activities generate value for said business organization.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein said performance management framework facilitates implementation and delivery of a defined value-adding strategy.

10. The method of claim 7 further comprising testing said value-tree models by inputting thereto actual historical company data and comparing outputs thereof with actual historical company performance.

11. The method of claim 10 further comprising improving accuracy of said value-tree models by adjusting said models in order to align outputs thereof with actual historical company performance.

12. The method of claim 7 wherein said performance management framework comprises financial targets defined based on relative performance of said business organization as compared to performances of other businesses that are similar situated.

13. The method of claim 7 wherein said performance management framework comprises non-financial targets based on relative performance of said business organization as compared to performances of other business that are similarly situated.

14. The method of claim 7 wherein said performance management framework comprises both financial and non-financial targets relative to peer companies.