Software tools and method for business planning

• US 20040073467A1
• Filed: 05/21/2003
• Published: 04/15/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 10/11/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Accenture Global Services Limited (Accenture PLC)
• Original Assignee: Accenture Global Services Limited (Accenture PLC)
• Inventors: McCarthy, Brian F., Smythe, Stewart, Reilly, Stuart, Heyns, Herman R.
• Application Number:
  US10/443,177
• Publication Number:
  US 20040073467A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06375 Prediction of business process outcome or impact based on a proposed change
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/00 Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes

Abstract

Goals within an organization are selected by querying a computer database containing a plurality of metrics of various companies in order to visual compare metrics for the different companies and thereby select a set of potential goals for further evaluation, determining anticipated effects on the stock price of a company using a pricing model, determining an impact on future case flows of specific operating strategies by using a cash flow model, and selecting goals from the set of potential goals in accordance with the outputs of the cash flow model.

Claims

1. A method of selecting goals for a target company comprising the steps of:

querying a computer database of historical financial data for a plurality of comparison companies to compare metrics of said companies and thereby evaluate a set of potential goals;

using a pricing model, determine anticipated effects on stock price for said target company;

using a cash flow model, determining an impact on future cash flows of specific operating strategies; and

selecting goals from said set of potential goals for said company in accordance with said outputs from said models.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said querying step includes the steps of:

requesting a first comparison of a first financial metric between said target company and at least one comparison peer company; and

displaying said first comparison in graphical form on a computer screen.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein said querying step includes the steps of:

viewing a list of industries, said list of industries including at least a first industry in which said target company participates;

selecting said first industry from said list;

viewing a list of peer companies which participate in said first industry;

selecting at least one of said peer companies, the selected company defining a comparison company; and

viewing financial metrics of said comparison company.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein said querying step further includes the steps of:

clearing said first comparison from said computer screen;

requesting a comparison of a second financial metric between said target company and at least one comparison peer company; and

displaying said second comparison in graphical form on a computer screen.

5. The method of claim 2 wherein said querying step further includes the steps of:

requesting a comparison of a second financial metric between said target company and at least one comparison peer company; and

simultaneous displaying said first and second comparisons in graphical form on a computer screen.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein said step of using a pricing model includes the steps of:

using a first computer model, estimating an appropriate stock price for said target company;

using a second computer model, determining how sensitive said stock price is to key financial value drivers.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein said cash flow model includes financial calculations for estimating future cash flows based upon variations of at least three operating strategies selected from the group consisting of consolidated acquisition, non-consolidated acquisition, business divestiture, expansion, productivity improvement, revenue enhancement, cost reduction, varying accounts receivable outstanding, varying accounts payable outstanding, varying inventory, and varying trading position.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein said step of using a cash flow model includes the step of modeling a candidate operating strategy as a hybrid of at least two of operating strategies selected from preprogrammed operating strategy scenarios within said third computer model.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein said step of using a cash flow computer model includes the step of translating operating strategies into numbers that can be entered into an income statement and balance sheet represented within said cash flow model.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein said cash flow model allows side-by-side comparisons of estimated results of operating under different operating strategies, in order to assist a user in selecting a worthwhile operating strategy to pursue.

11. The method of claim 5 wherein said first and second comparisons are displayed simultaneously for each of a plurality of financial reporting periods, to enable a user to see trends and estimate correlations between said potential goals and shareholder value expected to be returned by implementing selected ones of said potential goals.

12. A method of evaluating a plurality of objectives comprising the steps of:

providing a computer database containing financial performance and operating data for each of a plurality of businesses;

presenting a set of options to a user, said options including at least an option to select companies according to market groupings;

presenting to said user an option for selecting at least first and second companies under evaluation from among said companies for evaluation; and

presenting to said user options for selecting at least a first metric for each of said first and second companies by which to compare said first and second companies under evaluation, said comparison being shown on a computer screen such that said metrics of said first and second companies are displayed simultaneously and in visual association with one another.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein said metrics include operating metrics.

14. The method of claim 12 wherein said metrics include at least five metrics selected from the group consisting of Market Value Added, EVA®

, NOPLAT Return less the Weighted Average Cost of Capital, NOPLAT Return, Weighted Average Cost of Capital, Sales over Average Capital, EVA®

Margin, NOPLAT Growth, Revenue Growth, Growth Margin %, Sales, General &

Administrative Expense as a % of Sales, EBITDA Margin, Working Capital Effectiveness, Cash To Cash Cycle Time, Days Sales Outstanding, Days Supply of Inventory, Days Payables Outstanding, Capital Expenditure Ratio, and Cash Conversion Efficiency.

15. The method of claim 12 wherein said companies under evaluation further include a third company under evaluation, and wherein said metrics of said first, second, and third companies are displayed simultaneously and in visual association with one another.

16. The method of claim 12 wherein said database is accessible via a global computer network in order to allow a plurality of users to access said database from a plurality of different geographical locations.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein said global computer network is the Internet, and said plurality of users in different geographic locations can access said database simultaneously.

18. The method of claim 17 further comprising the step of downloading financial data of at least said second company across said network to said user, to enable said user to analyze said downloaded financial data off line.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein said downloaded financial data is downloaded as a spreadsheet data file.

20. A computer readable medium containing computer instructions capable of causing a programmable computer to implement the method of claim 12.

21. A method of obtaining increased value from the planning process within a business organization comprising the steps of:

prompting a user to input business data relating to the business organization into a computer;

presenting a list of possible business strategies to a user, and prompting the user to choose a selected strategy from among said possible business strategies;

based upon said business data received from said user and further based upon said selected business strategy, prompting said user to input additional data specific to said chosen strategy and to said business organization; and

presenting cash flow model output results to said user;

such that a user is guided through a series of questions specific to said chosen business strategy to assist the user in identifying key assumptions in evaluating said chosen business strategy and presenting said user with an expected resulting cash flow.

22. The method of claim 21 wherein said possible business strategies include at least three strategies selected from the group consisting of consolidated acquisition, non-consolidated acquisition, business divestiture, expansion, productivity improvement, revenue enhancement, cost reduction, varying accounts receivable outstanding, varying accounts payable outstanding, varying inventory, and varying trading position.