Method and apparatus for deterring frivolous professional liability claims
First Claim
1. A method of deterring prosecution of frivolous professional liability claims against professionals by recipients of professional services, said method comprising:
- issuing to a professional a plan of insurance for paying legal costs of prosecuting an improper prosecution claim against a proponent of a frivolous professional liability claim;
accepting a report, from a covered professional, of a professional liability claim, including data regarding said professional liability claim and disposition thereof; and
for each report received of a professional liability claim from a covered professional, reviewing said report for making a determination of whether said reported professional liability claim is frivolous;
wherein;
when prosecution of said professional liability claim included testimony by a expert witness belonging to a professional society having a code of conduct for expert testimony;
said reviewing comprises initiating a disciplinary proceeding before said professional society against said expert witness for violation of said code of conduct; and
imposition of discipline against said expert witness by said professional society is considered an indication of frivolousness.
1 Assignment
0 Petitions
Accused Products
Abstract
A plan of countersuit insurance provided to professionals, possibly as part of or along with their professional liability insurance, deters frivolous professional malpractice claims. The plan of insurance pays legal costs of countersuits for improper prosecution when a frivolous claim has been made and, preferably, tried to a judgment for the accused professional, and an objective review concludes that the claim was frivolous. The objective review may include initiating a disciplinary proceeding against any expert witness before a professional society to which the witness belongs, for violation of the code of conduct imposed by the society on its members. Ordinarily, such a proceeding would not be initiated unless an initial review indicated at least a possibility of frivolousness, and therefore of success in the proceeding. The outcome of the proceeding could be treated as conclusive proof of frivolousness, or could be treated as just another factor in a frivolousness determination.
29 Citations
39 Claims
-
1. A method of deterring prosecution of frivolous professional liability claims against professionals by recipients of professional services, said method comprising:
-
issuing to a professional a plan of insurance for paying legal costs of prosecuting an improper prosecution claim against a proponent of a frivolous professional liability claim;
accepting a report, from a covered professional, of a professional liability claim, including data regarding said professional liability claim and disposition thereof; and
for each report received of a professional liability claim from a covered professional, reviewing said report for making a determination of whether said reported professional liability claim is frivolous;
wherein;
when prosecution of said professional liability claim included testimony by a expert witness belonging to a professional society having a code of conduct for expert testimony;
said reviewing comprises initiating a disciplinary proceeding before said professional society against said expert witness for violation of said code of conduct; and
imposition of discipline against said expert witness by said professional society is considered an indication of frivolousness. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13)
-
-
14. Apparatus for deterring prosecution of frivolous professional liability claims against professionals by customers, said method comprising:
-
an issuing unit adapted to issue to a professional a plan of insurance for paying legal costs of prosecuting an improper prosecution claim against a proponent of a frivolous professional liability claim;
a claims unit adapted to accept a report, from a covered professional, of a professional liability claim, including data regarding said professional liability claim and disposition thereof;
a claims review unit comprising an output and an input device, wherein;
for each report received of a professional liability claim from a covered professional;
said output device flags said report for review for making a determination of whether said reported professional liability claim is frivolous, and on completion of said review, said determination is entered into said input device, said claims review unit further cmprising;
a discipline authorization unit adapted to authorize as part of said review, when prosecution of said professional liability claim included testimony by a expert witness belonging to a professional society having a code of conduct for expert testimony, the initiating of a disciplinary proceeding before said professional society against said expert witness for violation of said code of conduct;
wherein;
imposition of discipline against said expert witness by said professional society is considered an indication of frivolousness. - View Dependent Claims (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26)
-
-
27. A system of deterring prosecution of frivolous professional liability claims against professionals by customers, said system comprising:
-
means for issuing to a professional a plan of insurance for paying legal costs of prosecuting an improper prosecution claim against a proponent of a frivolous professional liability claim;
means for accepting a report, from a covered professional, of a professional liability claim, including data regarding said professional liability claim and disposition thereof;
means for, for each report received of a professional liability claim from a covered professional, reviewing said report for making a determination of whether said reported professional liability claim is frivolous, including, when prosecution of said professional liability claim included testimony by a expert witness belonging to a professional society having a code of conduct for expert testimony, initiating, as part of said reviewing, a disciplinary proceeding before said professional society against said expert witness for violation of said code of conduct, wherein imposition of discipline against said expert witness by said professional society is considered an indication of frivolousness. - View Dependent Claims (28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39)
-
Specification