Natural procedure labels controlled for coding

• US 20040117206A1
• Filed: 05/21/2003
• Published: 06/17/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 12/13/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Provation Medical Incorporated (Fortive Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Provation Medical Incorporated (Fortive Corp.)
• Inventors: Steinberger, Daniel, Hollington, Scott A., Benson, Sean C., Errickson, Allison S., McMurty, Michael G., Yu, Ying Ching, Del Toro, David A., Claypool, Steve R., Peitzman, Linda R., Crist, Peter E.
• Application Number:
  US10/442,406
• Publication Number:
  US 20040117206A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/2
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 15/00 ICT specially adapted for medical reports, e.g. generation or transmission thereof
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/67 for remote operation
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/20 for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 70/20 relating to practices or guidelines

Abstract

A computer-based system and method are described for generating a natural procedure label to summarize a clinical procedure description recorded into the system by a physician. The system and method manipulate a set of database records comprising medical content which is naturally descriptive of clinical procedures and which is controlled for coding to generate the natural procedure label and its corresponding non E & M Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) code during the recording the procedure description. To support the generation of a set of said natural procedure labels, the system and method provide interchangeable, connected, ontologically-based medical procedure database cartridges of medical content terms and rules that naturally describe constrained procedure representations for clinical procedure descriptions.

Claims

1. A method for documenting a medical procedure, comprising steps of:

(a) recording a medical procedure description; and

(b) constructing a natural procedure label based on the medical procedure description, wherein the natural procedure label concisely summarizes said medical procedure description.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of constructing the natural procedure label comprises steps of:

(a) accessing a first procedures representations database having a plurality of procedure term and attributes representations;

(b) selecting a procedure term and attributes representation from the first procedure database, the selected procedure term and attributes representation associated with the medical procedure description; and

(c) constructing the natural procedure label using the selected procedure term and attributes representation.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein said step of accessing a procedures representations database comprises:

(a) accessing a second database of procedure terminologies, the procedure terminologies interconnected to the first procedures representations database.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein said step of accessing the second procedures representations database comprises:

(a) accessing a third database of non E &

M CPT codes, said database of non E &

M CPT codes interconnected to the second procedures representations database.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein said step of selecting the procedure term and attributes representation further comprises:

(a) automatically selecting a plurality of non E &

M CPT codes from said database of non E &

M CPT codes.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein said step of constructing the natural procedure label comprises:

(a) associating a non E &

M CPT code to the natural procedure label, wherein the natural procedure label and the non E &

M CPT code concisely summarize the medical procedure description.

7. A method for documenting a medical procedure, comprising steps of:

(a) recording a medical procedure description;

(b) accessing a first procedures representations database having a plurality of procedure term and attributes representations;

(c) selecting a procedure term and attributes representation from the first procedure representations database, the selected procedure term and attributes representation associated with the medical procedure description; and

(d) constructing a natural procedure label using the recorded medical procedure description, wherein the natural procedure label concisely summarizes the medical procedure description.

8. The method of claim 7 further comprising:

(e) accessing a second database of procedure terminologies.

9. The method of claim 8 further comprising:

(f) accessing a third database of non E &

M CPT codes.

10. The method of claim 9 further comprising:

(g) automatically selecting a plurality of non E &

M CPT codes from the third database of non E &

M CPT codes; and

(h) associating a non E &

M CPT code to the natural procedure label, wherein the natural procedure label and the non E &

M CPT code concisely summarize the medical procedure description.

11. A documentation system for medical procedure descriptions, said system comprising:

(a) a computing device;

(b) a user interface residing on said computing device for recording a medical procedure description, said user interface arranged to construct a natural procedure label, wherein said natural procedure label concisely summarizes said medical procedure descriptions.

12. The system of claim 11 further comprising a first database residing on said computing device and connected to said user interface, said first database comprising a plurality of medical procedure descriptions and programming logic.

13. The system of claim 12 further comprising a second database residing on said computing device and connected to said user interface, said second database comprising a plurality of procedures terms and attributes representations.

14. The system of claim 13 further comprising an anticipatory user interface arranged to access said procedures terms and attributes representations residing on said user interface.

15. The system of claim 14 further comprising an ontology inference engine residing on said user interface;

and a third database residing on said computing device, said third database having a plurality of non E &

M CPT codes.

16. The system of claim 15 further comprising means for automatically selecting a plurality of non E &

M CPT codes from said third database and means for associating said non E &

M CPT codes to said natural procedure label, wherein said natural procedure label and said non E &

M CPT code concisely summarize said medical procedure description.

17. A documentation system for medical procedure descriptions, the system comprising:

(a) a computing device;

(b) a user interface residing on said computing device for recording a medical procedure description, said user interface arranged to construct a natural procedure label, wherein said natural procedure label concisely summarizes said medical procedure description;

(c) a first database residing on said computing device and connected to said user interface, said first database comprising a plurality of medical procedure descriptions and programming logic;

(d) a second database residing on said computing device and connected to said user interface, said second database comprising a plurality of procedures terms and attributes representations;

(e) an anticipatory user interface for accessing said procedure terms and attributes representations;

(f) an ontology inference engine residing on said user interface and said computing device;

(g) a third database residing on said computing device, said third database comprising a plurality of non E &

M CPT codes; and

(h) means for automatically selecting a plurality of non E &

M CPT codes from said third database and associating said non E &

M CPT codes to said natural procedure label, wherein said natural procedure label and said non E &

M CPT code concisely summarize said medical procedure description.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein said user interface and said first, second, and third databases operate on a plurality of computing devices operating on a networked computer system within a healthcare facility'"'"'s wide area network.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein said user interface and said first, second and third databases operate on a plurality of computing devices operating on said networked computer system within and outside of the healthcare facility'"'"'s wide area network.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein said user interface and said first, second and third databases have a functionality distributed to a plurality of said computing devices operating on said networked computer system within the healthcare facility'"'"'s wide area network.

21. The system of claim 20, wherein said user interface and said first, second and third databases have a functionality distributed to a plurality of computing devices operating on said networked computer system within and outside of the healthcare facility'"'"'s wide area network.

27. The system of claim 17 wherein any of said first, second and third databases is selected from the group consisting of relational, Object, text based, XML based, object-relational, and flat file produced by vendors including but not limited to Oracle, Microsoft, Sybase, IBM, Computer Associates, and Informix.

28. The system of claim 17 wherein said computing device is selected from the group consisting of Windows/Intel PC, PocketPC, Laptop PC, Tablet PC, Apple Computers, Citrix ICA computers, Unix Workstations, and Linux workstations produced by vendors including but not limited to Sun, IBM, Compaq, Dell, Apple, and HP.

29. The system of claim 17 wherein said user interface is selected from the group consisting of traditional Windows clients, browser/HTML based, J2EE, JAVA, XML based, Windows Forms, Windows NET, speech recognition, speech navigation, and Pocket PC interfaces produced by vendors including but not limited to IBM, Novell, Apple, Sun, and Microsoft.

22. A documentation system for medical procedure descriptions, said system comprising:

(a) a computing device;

(b) a user interface residing on said computing device for recording a medical procedure description, said user interface arranged to construct a natural procedure label, wherein said natural procedure label concisely summarizes said medical procedure description;

(c) a first database residing on said computing device and connected to said user interface, said first database comprising a plurality of medical procedure descriptions and programming logic;

(d) a second database residing on said computing device and connected to said user interface, said second database comprising a plurality of procedures terms and attributes representations;

(e) an anticipatory user interface for accessing said procedure terms and attributes representations residing on said user interface;

(f) an ontology inference engine residing on said user interface and said computing device;

(g) a third database residing on said computing device, said third database comprising a plurality of non E &

M CPT codes;

(h) means for automatically selecting a plurality of non E &

M CPT codes from said third database and associating said non E &

M CPT codes to said natural procedure label, wherein said natural procedure label and said non E &

M CPT code concisely summarize said medical procedure description; and

(i) said user interface and said first, second and third databases operating on a plurality of computing devices operating on a networked computer system within a healthcare facility'"'"'s wide area network.

23. The system of claim 22, further comprising:

(j) said user interface and said first, second, and third databases have a functionality being distributed to a plurality of computing devices operating on said networked computer system within the healthcare facility'"'"'s wide area network.

30. The system of claim 22 wherein any of said first, second and third databases is selected from the group consisting of relational, Object, text based, XML based, object-relational, and flat file produced by vendors including but not limited to Oracle, Microsoft, Sybase, IBM, Computer Associates, and Informix.

31. The system of claim 22 wherein said computing device is selected from the group consisting of Windows/Intel PC, PocketPC, Laptop PC, Tablet PC, Apple Computers, Citrix ICA computers, Unix Workstations, and Linux workstations produced by vendors including but not limited to Sun, IBM, Compaq, Dell, Apple, and HP.

32. The system of claim 22 wherein said networked computer system is selected from the group consisting of TPC/IP, Peer-to-Peer, Wireless, RPC, IPX/SPX, DLC, and Windows Networking produced by vendors including but not limited to IBM, Novell, Apple, RedHat, Unix, BSD, and Microsoft.

33. The system of claim 22 wherein said user interface is selected from the group consisting of traditional Windows clients, browser/HTML based, J2EE, JAVA, XML based, Windows Forms, Windows NET, speech recognition, speech navigation, and Pocket PC interfaces produced by vendors including but not limited to IBM, Novell, Apple, Sun, and Microsoft.

24. A documentation system for medical procedure descriptions comprising:

(a) a computing device;

(b) a user interface residing on said computing device for recording a medical procedure descriptions, said user interface arranged to construct a natural procedure label, wherein said natural procedure label concisely summarizes said medical procedure description;

(c) a first database residing on said computing device and connected to said user interface, said first database comprising a plurality of medical procedure descriptions and programming logic;

(d) a second database residing on said computing device and connected to said user interface, said second database comprising a plurality of procedures terms and attributes representations;

(e) an anticipatory user interface for accessing said procedure terms and attributes representations residing on said user interface;

(f) an ontology inference engine residing on said user interface and said computing device;

(g) a third database residing on said computing device, said third database comprising a plurality of non E &

M CPT codes;

(h) means for automatically selecting a plurality of non E &

M CPT codes from said third database and associating said non E &

M CPT codes to said natural procedure label, wherein said natural procedure label and said non E &

M CPT code concisely summarize said medical procedure description; and

(i) said user interface and said first, second and third databases operating on a plurality of computing devices operating on a networked computer system within and outside of a healthcare facility'"'"'s wide area network.

25. The system of claim 24 further comprising:

(j) said user interface and said first, second and third databases have a functionality distributed to a plurality of said computing devices operating on said networked computer system within the healthcare facility'"'"'s wide area network.

26. The system of claim 24 further comprising:

(j) said user interface and said first, second and third databases have a functionality being distributed to a plurality of computing devices operating on said networked computer system within and outside of the healthcare facility'"'"'s wide area network.

34. The system of claim 24 wherein any of said first, second and third databases is selected from the group consisting of relational, Object, text based, XML based, object-relational, and flat file produced by vendors including but not limited to Oracle, Microsoft, Sybase, IBM, Computer Associates, and Informix.

35. The system of claim 24 wherein said computing device is selected from the group consisting of Windows/Intel PC, PocketPC, Laptop PC, Tablet PC, Apple Computers, Citrix ICA computers, Unix Workstations, and Linux workstations produced by vendors including but not limited to Sun, IBM, Compaq, Dell, Apple, and HP.

36. The system of claim 24 wherein said networked computer system is selected from the group consisting of TPC/IP, Peer-to-Peer, Wireless, RPC, IPX/SPX, DLC, and Windows Networking produced by vendors including but not limited to IBM, Novell, Apple, RedHat, Unix, BSD, and Microsoft.

37. The system of claim 24 wherein said user interface is selected from the group consisting of traditional Windows clients, browser/HTML based, J2EE, JAVA, XML based, Windows Forms, Windows .NET, speech recognition, speech navigation, and Pocket PC interfaces produced by vendors including but not limited to IBM, Novell, Apple, Sun, and Microsoft.