Method and system for combating robots and rogues

• US 20040117654A1
• Filed: 12/19/2003
• Published: 06/17/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 01/09/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Fortent Limited (Nice Ltd)
• Original Assignee: Fortent Limited (Nice Ltd)
• Inventors: Recce, Michael, Kingdon, Jason, Feldman, Konrad S
• Application Number:
  US10/250,718
• Publication Number:
  US 20040117654A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 713/201
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/6218 to a system of files or objects, e.g. local or distributed file system or database
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/2119 Authenticating web pages, e.g. with suspicious links

Abstract

A method of identifying and combating rogue or robot activity at a web-site, comprising the steps of: monitoring accesses made to the web-site in order to facilitate the detection of robots or rogue accesses; detecting any such accesses; and providing obstacles to such access. This invention provides a method and system of ensuring the authenticity of users of a web-site or resource. It exhibits the advantage of ensuring a real return for advertisers, and combating fraud.

Claims

1. A method of combating unwanted robot or robot like accesses to a web-site, comprising the steps of:

monitoring accesses made to the web-site in order to facilitate the detection of robot or robot like accesses; and

upon detecting that a robot or robot like access is underway, deploying one or more obstacles to that access,

wherein the one or more obstacles are forms of dynamic change of page layout within the website.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the forms of dynamic change applied to page layout are selected from:

the introduction of hidden text, table elements or comment fields;

changes in field ordering;

renaming or randomisation of entry fields or form names;

addition of randomisation information, intermediate pages processing steps, redundant form fields, dialog boxes, page processing steps, re-directs; and

changing the use of frames or tables.

3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, in which a further obstacle may be selected, that obstacle being the generation of a warning or notification of site abuse.

4. A method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the warning or notification generated is delivered to one or more of a suspected robot system, a user thereof, a robot like system or user, an operator or owner of the site experiencing abuse, a monitoring station or an enforcement agency.

5. A method as claimed in any of claims 1 to 4, in which one or more further obstacles, selected from the limitation of bandwidth, the suspension of a user account and the termination of the access may also be selected.

6. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the step of detecting such accesses includes initially identifying a possible robot or robot like access to a website and carrying out one or more checks in order to further determine the status of an entity making requesting the access

7. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein a differentiation between the behavioural characteristics of different users is utilised to facilitate detection.

8. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the step of monitoring is carried out both in real time and offline.

9. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the step of monitoring includes monitoring one or more of:

failed page requests, failures associated with forms or other system accesses;

IP addresses accessing the website;

modification and updating of cookies;

watch lists; and

user registration, user profiles, user domains or user access times.

10. A system configured to combat unwanted robot or robot like accesses to a website, comprising:

at least one detection system configured to receive incoming access requests by a user of the website and to detect when a robot or robot like access is underway; and

an obstacle generator to generate and roll out one or more obstacles to that access upon its detection,

wherein the one or more obstacles are forms of dynamic change of page layout within the web-site.

11. A system as claimed in claim 10, wherein the forms of dynamic change applied to page layout are selected from:

the introduction of hidden text, table elements or comment fields;

changes in field ordering;

renaming or randomisation of entry fields or form names;

addition of redundant information, intermediate pages, processing steps, redundant form fields, dialog boxes, page processing steps, redirects; and

changing the use of frames or tables.

12. A system as claimed in claim 10 or claim 11, wherein the obstacles selectable for rolling out also include the generation of a warning or notification of site abuse.

13. A system as claimed in claim 12, wherein the warning or notification generated is delivered to one or more of a suspected robot system, a user thereof, a robot like system or user, an operator or owner of the site experiencing abuse, a monitoring station or an enforcement agency.

14. A system as claimed in any of claims 10 to 13, wherein the obstacles selectable for rolling out also include the limitation of bandwidth, the suspension of a user account and the termination of the access.

15. A system as claimed in any of claims 10 to 14, wherein the system also comprises one or more built in obstacles to robot or robot like accesses.

16. A system as claimed in claim 15, wherein the obstacles built in to the system include at least one of a regular web-site reconstruction scheme, changes to form fields within the web-site and traps including recursive loops.

17. A system as claimed in any of claims 10 to 16, wherein the detection system monitors one or more of:

failed page requests, failures associated with forms or other system accesses;

IP addresses seeking access;

modification and updating of cookies;

watch lists; and

user registration details, user profiles, user domains or user access times

18. A system as claimed in any of claims 10 to 17, further including a data store in which is recorded the monitored and/or detected details.

19. A method substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to and as shown in FIGS. 1 to 3 of the accompanying drawings.

20. A system substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to and as shown in FIGS. 1 to 3 of the accompanying drawings.