Method and system for efficient validation of nonprofit organizations

• US 20040122682A1
• Filed: 12/18/2002
• Published: 06/24/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 12/18/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Kintera, Inc. (Blackbaud Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: Kintera, Inc. (Blackbaud Incorporated)
• Inventors: Klein, Steve, Gruber, Harry E., Gruber, Allen B.
• Application Number:
  US10/323,951
• Publication Number:
  US 20040122682A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/018 Certifying business or products
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/04 Billing or invoicing

Abstract

A web-based automated method for validating a nonprofit organization is disclosed. In one embodiment, the method comprises the steps of applying online for a validation from a validator, receiving data pertaining to the nonprofit organization, analyzing the data to determine if the nonprofit organization is a bona fide organization, if the NPO is a bona fide organization, issuing the organization a validation, and if the NPO is not a bona fide organization, then denying the organization a validation. The method further comprises the step of providing an online seal of approval to the validated nonprofit organization. The method further comprises the step of displaying online the nonprofit organization data. The method further comprises the step of listing the validated nonprofit on an auction website. The method further comprises the step of receiving a donation from the sales proceeds of an auction.

Claims

1. A web-based automated method for validating a nonprofit organization, the method comprising the steps of:

applying online for a validation from a validator;

receiving data pertaining to the nonprofit organization;

analyzing the data to determine if the nonprofit organization fulfills predetermined criteria;

if the nonprofit organization fulfills the predetermined criteria, issuing the organization a validation.

2. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of denying the nonprofit organization a validation if the nonprofit organization does not fulfill the predetermined criteria.

3. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of providing an online seal of validation to the validated nonprofit organization.

4. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of displaying online the nonprofit organization data.

5. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of listing the validated nonprofit on an auction website.

6. The method according to claim 5, further comprising the step of receiving a donation from the sales proceeds of an auction.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the validator charges a fee to the nonprofit organization for the validation.

8. The method according to claim 4, further comprising the step of authenticating the online seal of validation.

9. A web-based automated method for validating and rating a nonprofit organization, the method comprising the steps of:

accessing a website;

requesting validation of the nonprofit organization;

determining if the nonprofit organization has complied with state and federal laws;

if the nonprofit organization has complied with state and federal laws, then providing a satisfactory rating to the nonprofit organization.

10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the step of determining the nonprofit organization'"'"'s compliance with laws further includes the step of verifying if the nonprofit has registered as a nonprofit organization in one or more states.

11. The method as recited in claim 10, wherein the step of determining the nonprofit'"'"'s compliance with laws further includes the step of verifying if the nonprofit has filed an annual financial report as required by most states.

12. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the step of determining the nonprofit'"'"'s compliance with laws further includes the step of verifying if the nonprofit has violated any criminal laws.

13. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the step of determining the nonprofit'"'"'s compliance with laws further includes the step of verifying if the nonprofit is classified as a nonprofit organization by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

14. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the step of determining the nonprofit'"'"'s compliance with laws further includes the step of verifying if the nonprofit has complied with IRS regulations for nonprofit organizations.

15. The method as recited in claim 9, further comprising evaluating the nonprofit for a rating by checking the nonprofit'"'"'s finances.

16. The method as recited in claim 15, further comprising evaluating the nonprofit for a rating by checking the nonprofit'"'"'s reputation by determining if it is listed in reputed publications that serve the nonprofit industry.

17. The method as recited in claim 16, further comprising the step of assigning a rating based on the nonprofit'"'"'s finances and its reputation.

18. The method according to claim 9, further comprising the step of listing the rated nonprofit on an auction website.

19. The method according to claim 18, further comprising the step of receiving a donation from the sales proceeds of an auction.

20. A web-based automated system for validating a nonprofit organization, comprising:

means for applying online for a validation from a validator;

means for receiving data pertaining to the nonprofit organization;

means for analyzing the data to determine if the nonprofit organization fulfills predetermined criteria;

means for issuing a validation if the nonprofit organization fulfills the predetermined criteria.

21. The system according to claim 20, further comprising means for providing an online seal of validation to the validated nonprofit organization.

22. The system according to claim 20, further comprising means for displaying online the nonprofit organization data.

23. The system according to claim 20, further comprising means for listing the validated nonprofit on an auction website.

24. The system according to claim 23, further means for receiving a donation from the sales proceeds of an auction.

25. The system according to claim 21, further comprising means for authenticating the online seal of validation.

26. A computer-readable medium having computer executable instructions for a web-based automated method for validating a nonprofit organization, the method comprising the steps of:

applying online for a validation from a validator;

receiving data pertaining to the nonprofit organization;

analyzing the data to determine if the nonprofit organization fulfills predetermined criteria;

if the nonprofit organization fulfills the predetermined criteria, issuing the organization a validation.