Method to evaluate project viability

• US 20040148566A1
• Filed: 05/13/2003
• Published: 07/29/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 01/24/2003
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JP Morgan Chase & Co)
• Original Assignee: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JP Morgan Chase & Co)
• Inventors: Cork, Julian H., Jaffar, Mustafa X.
• Application Number:
  US10/437,368
• Publication Number:
  US 20040148566A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 715/503
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/18 of spreadsheets form-filling G06F40/174

Abstract

A method of rating a project provides a functional result in the form of a standardized rating of project viability. The method receives data regarding a project and uses that data to generate the standardized rating, and costs and benefits of project, including the dollar benefits, the non-dollar benefits. For each project, a symbol of varying size representing a project parameter, such as total cost of the project, can be plotted on at least two axis, one axis representing a dollar benefit score, and the other axis representing a non-dollar benefit score. Those using the results generated by the method can then take appropriate actions regarding one or more projects. The method'"'"'s evaluation results are useful for project pre-planning, approval, and evaluation of the project'"'"'s viability as it progresses towards completion. It can also be used for a full post-implementation review to confirm whether the project'"'"'s targets have been met.

Claims

1. A computer assisted method for rating a project comprising the steps of:

receiving data describing the project;

generating a standardized rating of the project'"'"'s viability by computing a plurality of project parameters based on the data including a computed dollar benefit score and a computed non-dollar benefit score;

plotting a symbol on a computer generated graph, wherein the area of the symbol is proportional to a project parameter, and wherein the symbol is plotted on a graph having at least a first coordinate axis representing the computed dollar benefit score and the second coordinate axis representing a computed non-dollar benefit score; and

taking an action based on the graph.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein receiving data comprises receiving data by inputting data into a spreadsheet.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein receiving data comprises receiving data into a spreadsheet program selected from the group consisting of Excel, Lotus 1-2-3, Quattro, and Quattro-Pro.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein plotting a symbol on a graph comprises plotting a circular symbol on a graph.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein plotting a symbol on a graph comprises plotting a circular symbol of variable area on a graph.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein plotting a symbol on a graph comprises plotting a circular symbol of variable area on a graph, wherein the area is proportional to a total project cost.

7. The method of claim 5 wherein plotting on a graph comprises plotting on a graph in the Cartesian coordinate system.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein taking an action based on the project'"'"'s graph comprises taking an action selected from the group consisting of modifying the project, canceling the project, postponing the project, and making no changes to the project.

9. A System to generate standard ratings of projects comprising:

a computer for receiving data about a project;

the computer programmed to assign a dollar, and a non-dollar value, and a project score to each project, and further programmed to display a graph including a symbol plotted on a graph, the graph having at least two axis including a first axis, and a second axis, the first axis representing the dollar value and the second axis representing the non-dollar score for each project and the area of the symbol representing the cost of the project.

10. The system of claim 9 wherein the computer comprises a client computer and a server computer connected by a network.

11. The system of claim 9 wherein the programmed computer is programmed on a spreadsheet program.

12. The system of claim 11 wherein the programmed computer is programmed in Excel.

13. The system of claim 11 wherein the programmed computer is programmed in a computer language.

14. The system of claim 13 wherein the programmed computer is programmed in an object oriented computer language.

15. The system of claim 14 wherein the programmed computer is programmed in an object oriented computer language selected from the group comprising C++, Java, and J2EE.