Method for calibration of an electronic camera

• US 20040189805A1
• Filed: 04/08/2004
• Published: 09/30/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 10/12/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: MESA IMAGING AG (Ams-Osram AG)
• Original Assignee: CSEM Centre Suisse D'Electronique et de Microtechnique SA
• Inventors: Seitz, Peter
• Application Number:
  US10/820,383
• Publication Number:
  US 20040189805A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 348/188
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 17/002 for television cameras
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 23/661 Transmitting camera control signals through networks, e.g. control via the Internet

Abstract

An electronic camera can be reprogrammed, recalibrated or optimized for a given application or environment by a remote expert who does not have to be present locally. The camera requires a bi-directional data path to the expert, preferably using the internet, for writing parameters into the camera'"'"'s program memory and for reading its acquired images. The remote expert must be capable of presenting selected visual stimuli to the camera, which are presented by a suitable image presentation device to the camera, under remote control by the expert. Thanks to the invention, a recalibration of the camera is more simple, faster, at lower costs and independent of the location of the camera user.

Claims

1. A method for the calibration of an electronic camera located at a local site, comprising the steps of:

(a) presenting an optical stimulus to the camera;

(b) acquiring at least one image of said optical stimulus by the camera;

(c) transmitting said at least one image via telecommunication means from said local site to a remote site; and

(d) evaluating said at least one image at said remote site.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said optical stimulus is transmitted (via telecommunication means from said remote site to said local site.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein said optical stimulus comprises at least one image and is presented to the camera by an image presentation device located at said local site.

4. The method according to claim 3, wherein said image presentation device is selected from the group consisting of a video monitor, a computer monitor, a slide projector, a transparency projector, an overhead projector, and a printed-paper projector.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein prior to acquiring the image of said optical stimulus (step (b)), parameters influencing the camera behavior are selected at said remote site and transmitted via telecommunication means from said remote site to said local site.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein parameters influencing the camera properties are determined at said remote site, the determination depending on the evaluation of said at least one image (step (d)), and transmitted via telecommunication means from said remote site to said local site.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation of said at least one image (step (d)) results in a decision whether the camera properties are satisfactory of not.

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein, in case of unsatisfactory camera properties, the method according to any of the previous claims is repeated in order to determine new parameters influencing the camera properties.

9. The method according to claim 7, wherein, in case of satisfactory camera properties, the method according to any of the previous claims is repeated in order to verify the validity of the camera configuration.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein said telecommunication means are electronic and/or optical telecommunication means and preferably comprise a worldwide data transmission network such as the internet, a leased or switched telephone line, or an optical data link.

11. The method according to claim 1, wherein a local controller/interface device is located at said local site between the camera and said telecommunication means.

12. The method according to claim 11, wherein said local controller/interface device is connected to the camera via an output data interface and an input data interface.

13. The method according to claim 3, wherein said local controller/interface device controls said image presentation device.

14. The method according to claim 13, wherein said local controller/interface device is connected to said image presentation device via a video interface.

15. The method according to claim 1, wherein an expert is located at said remote site and controls the performance of the method according to any of the previous claims, said expert being a human person and/or an electronic controlling device.

16. The method according to claim 15, wherein a remote controller/interface device is located at said remote site between said expert and said telecommunication means.

25. The method according to claim 11, wherein said local controller/interface device controls said image presentation device.

26. The method according to claim 25, wherein said local controller/interface device is connected to said image presentation device via a video interface.

17. An arrangement for the calibration of an electronic camera, comprising

means for placing the camera located at a local site;

an image presentation device located at a local site;

means for evaluating an image acquired by the camera, said image-evaluating means being located at a site remote from said local site;

means for determining parameters influencing the camera properties, depending on the evaluation of said image, said parameter-determining means being located at a site remote from said local site; and

bi-directional telecommunication means for connecting said local site and said remote site.

18. The arrangement according to claim 17, wherein said image presentation device is selected from the group consisting of a video monitor, a computer monitor, a slide projector, a transparency projector, an overhead projector, and a printed-paper projector.

19. The arrangement according to claim 17, wherein said image-evaluating means are an electronic controlling device.

20. The arrangement according to claim 17, wherein said parameter-determining means are a computer.

21. The arrangement according to claim 17, wherein said bi-directional telecommunication means are selected from the group consisting of electronic telecommunication means and optical telecommunication means.

22. The arrangement according to claim 21, wherein said bi-directional telecommunication means are selected from the group consisting of a worldwide data transmission network, a leased or switched telephone line, and an optical data link.

23. A data processing system for the calibration of an electronic camera, wherein said data processing system includes a display and an operating system, said data processing system comprising:

means for selecting an optical stimulus;

means for transmitting said optical stimulus via telecommunication means to the camera;

means for receiving via telecommunication means an image acquired by the camera;

means for evaluating said image;

means for determining parameters influencing the camera properties, depending on the evaluation of said image; and

means for transmitting said parameters via telecommunication means to the camera.

24. A computer readable medium, having a program recorded thereon, where the program is to make a computer execute procedure

to select an optical stimulus;

to transmit said optical stimulus via telecommunication means to a camera;

to receive via telecommunication means an image acquired by the camera;

to evaluate said image;

to determine parameters influencing the camera properties, depending on the evaluation of said image; and

to transmit said parameters via telecommunication means to the camera.