Variable rate billing methods

• US 20040235451A1
• Filed: 06/26/2004
• Published: 11/25/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 08/29/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Christopher J. Whewell, Jean E. Whewell
• Original Assignee: Christopher J. Whewell, Jean E. Whewell
• Inventors: Whewell, Christopher J., Whewell, Jean E.
• Application Number:
  US10/876,938
• Publication Number:
  US 20040235451A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 455/406
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 15/00 Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 15/49 Connection to several service providers
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 15/70 Administration or customization aspects; Counter-checking correct charges
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 15/73 Validating charges
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 15/8044 Least cost routing
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 15/8083 involving reduced rates or discounts, e.g. time-of-day reductions or volume discounts
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 17/00 Prepayment of wireline communication systems, wireless communication systems or telephone systems using a coded card to authorise calls from a telephone set H04M1/675
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 2215/0184 involving reduced rates or discounts, e.g. time-of-day reductions, volume discounts, cell discounts, group billing, frequent calling destination(s) or user history list
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 2215/2026 Wireless network, e.g. GSM, PCS, TACS
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 2215/32 Involving wireless systems
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 2215/42 Least cost routing, i.e. provision for selecting the lowest cost tariff
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 2215/46 Connection to several service providers
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 2215/70 Administration aspects, modify settings or limits or counter-check correct charges
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 2215/7072 Validate charges
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 2215/745 Least cost routing, e.g. Automatic or manual, call by call or by preselection
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 4/24 Accounting or billing

Abstract

Provided herein is a variable billing plan which calculates the lowest possible invoice amount to be billed to a consumer of various goods and/or services, including without limitation cellular services, from a variety of billing options. Through use of a billing method according to the invention, consumer loyalty is increased at negligible expense to bandwidth consumption.

Claims

1. ) A method for a provider of goods and/or services to determine an amount to be charged to a customer for the consumption or use of one or more goods or services, which method comprises the steps of:

a) obtaining a consumption value based on the consumption by a customer of one or more goods or services during a service interval;

b) calculating a plurality of invoice amounts using said consumption value as a basis, at least partially, wherein said plurality of invoice amounts include at least one hypothetical invoice amount;

c) comparing at least two of the invoice amounts from said plurality of invoice amounts with one another, wherein at least one of said invoice amounts being compared is a hypothetical invoice amount; and

d) selecting one of said invoice amounts from said plurality of invoice amounts.

2. ) A method according to claim 1 further comprising the step of:

e) charging a customer in an amount of at least said selected invoice amount.

3. ) A method according to claim 1 wherein said at least one hypothetical invoice amount is calculated using the terms of a billing plan that was offered to said customer by an entity selected from the group consisting of:

said provider;

a contractee of said provider; and

a competitor of said provider, but not accepted by said customer at the time of execution of a contract between said customer and said entity for such goods and/or services.

4. ) A method according to claim 1 wherein said at least one hypothetical invoice amount is calculated using the terms of a billing plan that is or was offered by a second provider of said goods and/or services that it different than said provider.

5. ) A method according to claim 4 wherein said second provider is a competitor of said provider.

6. ) A method according to claim 1 wherein said at least one hypothetical invoice amount is calculated using the terms of a billing plan which includes a pre-determined threshold level of goods or services which are billed at a first rate, and a second rate per unit of goods or services for each unit used which exceeds said threshold level.

7. ) A method according to claim 1 wherein said at least one hypothetical invoice amount is calculated using the terms of a billing plan which includes a pre-determined threshold level of goods or services which are billed at a flat rate, and a rate per unit of goods or services for each unit used which exceeds said threshold level.

8. ) A method according to claim 1 wherein the amount to be charged under the selected invoice amount is not the highest dollar equivalent value of all of said plurality of invoice amounts.

9. ) A method according to claim 1 wherein the amount to be charged under the selected invoice amount is the least dollar equivalent value of all of said plurality of invoice amounts.

10. ) A process according to claim 1 wherein at least two of said plurality of invoice amounts are calculated using the terms of different billing plans, which billing plans each include a threshold level of goods or services which are billed at a first rate.

11. ) A process according to claim 10 wherein the different billing plans each include a different threshold level of goods or services which are billed at a first rate.

12. ) A method according to claim 1 wherein said plurality of invoice amounts include an invoice amount calculated using the terms of a billing plan that was agreed to contractually between said provider and said customer.

13. ) A method according to claim 6 wherein at least one of said plurality of invoice amounts are calculated by combining the total dollar equivalent value of a flat rate and an addend that is calculated based on the number of units of goods or services used that exceed said threshold level, and a rate per unit charged for each unit exceeding said threshold level.

14. ) A method according to claim 7 wherein at least one of said plurality of invoice amounts are calculated by combining the total dollar equivalent value of a flat rate and an addend that is calculated based on the number of units of goods or services used that exceed said threshold level, and a rate per unit charged for each unit exceeding said threshold level.

15. ) A method according to claim 8 further comprising the step of:

f) charging the customer a surcharge for being invoiced under said method.

16. ) A method according to claim 15 wherein said surcharge is effectively levied as a flat rate over a service interval.

17. ) A method according to claim 15 wherein said surcharge is a fixed value that remains constant over at least two consecutive billing cycles.

18. ) A method according to claim 15 wherein said surcharge is variable, depending upon the total amount of goods and/or services consumed.

19. ) A method according to claim 15 wherein said plurality of invoice amounts include an invoice amount calculated using the terms of a billing plan that was agreed to in a contract between said provider and said customer, and wherein said surcharge is any amount between zero and the difference between the invoice amount calculated using the terms of a billing plan that was agreed to in a contract between said provider and said customer and said selected invoice amount.

20. ) A method according to claim 15 wherein said plurality of invoice amounts include an invoice amount calculated using the terms of a billing plan that was agreed to in a contract between said provider and said customer, and wherein said surcharge is any amount between zero and the difference between the invoice amount calculated using the terms of a billing plan that was agreed to in a contract between said provider and the terms of a billing plan offered by a competitor of said provider.

21. ) A method according to claim 1 further comprising the step of:

crediting the account of said customer in an amount that is between zero and the difference between the invoice amount calculated using the terms of a billing plan that was agreed to in a contract between said provider and said customer, and a hypothetical invoice amount calculated using terms of a billing plan offered by a competitor of said provider.

22. ) A method according to claim 1 further comprising the step of:

crediting the account of said customer in an amount that is between zero and the difference between the invoice amount calculated using the terms of a billing plan that was agreed to in a contract between said provider and said customer, and a hypothetical invoice amount calculated using terms of a billing plan offered by a competitor of said provider, for a substantially equivalent quantity of the same or substantially equivalent goods and/or services over a substantially equivalent service interval.

23. ) A method according to claim 19 wherein said surcharge is about one-half of the amount saved through use of the method as compared to what the consumer'"'"'s invoice would have been under the billing schedule chosen by said customer under said contract.

24. ) An invoicing plan which comprises:

a) calculation of at least one hypothetical invoice amount using a consumption value that is reflective of the consumption by a customer of one or more goods and/or services during a service interval according to the terms of a billing plan to which said customer is not contractually bound; and

b) comparison of said at least one hypothetical invoice amount with an invoice amount said customer is contractually obligated to pay for such goods and/or services;

c) charging said customer an invoice amount which is based on selection criteria.

25. ) A plan according to claim 24 wherein said selection criteria are determined by the provider of said goods and/or services.

26. ) A plan according to claim 24 wherein said selection criteria are fixed for at least two consecutive billing cycles.

27. ) A plan according to claim 24 wherein said selection criteria are variable from one billing cycle to the next.

28. ) A plan according to claim 24 wherein said selection criteria are based at least in part, on the usage of said goods and/or service by said customer over one or more service intervals.

29. ) A plan according to claim 24 wherein said selection criteria are based at least in part on which of said plurality of invoice amounts is the highest dollar equivalent value.

30. ) A plan according to claim 24 wherein said selection criteria are based at least in part on which of said plurality of invoice amounts is the least dollar equivalent value.

31. ) A plan according to claim 24 further comprising the step of:

d) applying a surcharge to the invoice amount charged to the customer for the use of said invoicing plan.

32. ) A plan according to claim 24 further comprising the step of:

selecting an invoice amount from amounts selected from the group consisting of;

said at least one hypothetical invoice amount and said amount said customer is contractually obligated to pay.

33. ) A plan according to claim 32 further comprising the step of:

applying a surcharge to the invoice amount charged to the customer for the use of said invoicing plan.

34. ) A method of advertising for providers that supply goods and/or services to customers, which includes the step of:

offering said customers an invoicing plan which changes the amount that the customer is invoiced when the customer'"'"'s consumption of said goods and/or services fluctuates, over what it would have been in the absence of said invoicing plan, wherein said invoicing plan includes the calculation of at least one hypothetical invoice amount using a consumption value based on the consumption by a customer of one or more goods or services during a service interval according to the terms of a billing plan to which said customer is not contractually bound, and compares said at least one hypothetical invoice amount with the amount said customer is contractually obligated to pay said provider under an existing contract.

35. ) A billing plan which provides for the total of the invoices charged to a customer over a plurality of service intervals to remain the same or to be reduced in dollar equivalent value when the customer'"'"'s consumption of goods and/or services increases from one service interval to another within said plurality of service intervals, with respect to the total amount said customer would have been charged under a contract offered by at least one other provider of the same goods and/or services for such same goods and/or services during the same service intervals.

36. ) A method of advertising cellular telephone services comprising the step of:

offering a variable billing plan, wherein said plan enables the total of the invoices charged to a customer over a plurality of service intervals to remain constant or be reduced if the customer'"'"'s usage fluctuates from one service interval to another, as compared to the total amount the customer would be invoiced under the terms of at least one other single contract offered to the customer by any provider of such services in the marketplace for substantially the same quantity of service over a service interval of substantially the same length, wherein said at least one other single contract is made available or offered to said customer after said customer has already executed a contract for such services.

37. ) A method of advertising cellular telephone services comprising the step of:

offering a variable billing plan, wherein said plan enables the total of the invoices charged to a customer over a plurality of service intervals to remain constant or be reduced if the customer'"'"'s usage fluctuates from one service interval to another, as compared to the total amount the customer would be invoiced under the terms of at least one other single contract offered to the customer by any provider of such services in the marketplace for substantially the same quantity of service over a service interval of substantially the same length, wherein said at least one other single contract is made available or offered to said customer before said customer has executed a contract for such services.

38. ) A billing method which is capable of causing the amount which a consumer of goods and/or services is invoiced to remain the same or to be reduced when the customer'"'"'s usage increases, versus what said consumer would have been invoiced under any one contract offered to said consumer prior to or during consumption of said goods and/or services.