Adaptive mechanism for optimally accessing data

• US 20040243987A1
• Filed: 05/30/2003
• Published: 12/02/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 05/30/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Yellin, Daniel M.
• Granted Patent: US 7,185,314 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/151
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3452 Performance evaluation by statistical analysis

Abstract

A runtime system, program product and method for determining a mode of operation for a software component, comprises steps of a) running in a first implementation mode; b) determining a first cost associated with running in the first implementation mode; c) determining a second cost associated with switching to a second implementation and running in the second implementation mode; and d) comparing the first cost with the second cost; and e) providing a recommendation to switch to the second mode based on the comparison of the first cost with the second cost. According to another embodiment a deterministic 3-competitive algorithm is used to solve this problem. We also show that this matches the lower bound, as any deterministic algorithm cannot be better than 3-competitive. According to another embodiment a probabilistic algorithm is also used to solve this problem as well.

Claims

1. A runtime method for determining an implementation mode of operation for a software component, comprising steps of:

a) running in a first implementation mode;

b) determining a first cost associated with operating in the first implementation mode;

c) determining a second cost associated with switching to a second implementation mode and with operating in the second implementation mode;

d) comparing the first cost with the second cost; and

e) providing a recommendation on whether to switch to the second mode based on the comparison of the first cost with the second cost.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein steps b) and c) each determine cost by using a cost matrix.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the cost matrix lists the cost of executing an operation of a given type for each implementation mode,

4. The method of claim 2 wherein the cost matrix further lists the cost of switching from one implementation mode to another.

5. The method of claim 2, further comprising switching to the second implementation mode.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising implementing the switching gradually over a period of time.

7. The method of claim 5, further comprising implementing the switching immediately.

8. The method of claim 1,wherein the software components operate within applications that read and write data from a centralized data base controlled by a server and steps b) and c) comprise determining the number of data base read operations by a particular application and the number of data base write operations performed by any application during a period of time, and the application is for operating in subscription and non-subscription modes wherein the subscription mode comprises maintaining a local replica of the data base.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising the steps of:

switching from the non-subscription mode to the subscription mode;

informing the server of the switching;

and

discarding the local replica of the data base.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the first mode is non-subscription.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the software component is used with an application served by a server, and wherein:

step d) comprises determining whether the cost of read and write operations performed by the software component exceeds the cost of write operations performed by all software components also served by the server by at least a predetermined number, while the client is in non-subscription mode; and

step e) comprises changing to the subscription mode when the determination of step d) is affirmative.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein the software component is used with an application served by a server, and step d) comprises determining whether the cost of write operations performed by all applications served by the server exceeds the cost of read and write operations by at least a predetermined number, while the client is in subscription mode;

and step e) comprises changing to the non-subscription mode when the determination of step d) is affirmative.

13. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of switching the mode of operation when the first cost exceeds the second cost by the cost of switching from one mode to another mode and switching back.

14. The method of claim 8 wherein the component is hosted by a client of the server that comprises a local replica of the data base and the method further comprises replicating data in increments, each time the application reads or writes data that is not already in its local replica.

15. A system comprising logic for:

a) running in a first implementation mode;

b) determining a first cost associated with running in the first implementation mode;

c) determining a second cost associated with switching to a second implementation mode and with running in the second implementation mode;

d) comparing the first cost with the second cost; and

e) providing a recommendation whether to switch to the second mode based on the comparison of the first cost with the second cost.

16. The system of claim 15 wherein the logic comprises an application-specific integrated circuit.

17. A computer readable medium comprising computer readable instructions for:

a) running in a first implementation mode;

b) determining a first cost associated with running in the first implementation mode;

c) determining a second cost associated with switching to the second implementation and running in the second implementation mode;

d) comparing the first cost with the second cost; and

e) providing a recommendation whether to switch to the second mode based on the comparison of the first cost.

18. In a data processing network comprising a software component comprising at least a first and second implementation a method comprising

a) monitoring requests made to the software component;

b) determining, based on the monitoring, whether processing of the requests can be improved by switching the operation of the software component from the first to the second implementation;

c) informing the software component to switch to the second implementation if it is determined that the processing can be improved.

19. The method of claim 18 further comprising switching to the second implementation.