System for automated problem detection, diagnosis, and resolution in a software driven system

• US 20050015678A1
• Filed: 05/21/2004
• Published: 01/20/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 05/10/1999
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: HFN, LLC
• Original Assignee: HandsFree Networks, Inc.
• Inventors: Miller, Allan A.
• Granted Patent: US 7,100,085 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 714/38
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/0748 in a remote unit communicating with a single-box computer node experiencing an error/fault remote testing G06F11/2294
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/079 Root cause analysis, i.e. error or fault diagnosis in a hardware test environment G06F11/22; in a software test environment G06F11/36
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/2252 using fault dictionaries
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/2294 by remote test
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/366 using diagnostics G06F11/0703 takes precedence

Abstract

In many systems, computer software is a common source of failure or instability. The proliferation of multiple interacting applications from several different software vendors leads to “emergent” problems that are difficult or impossible to predict or prevent. The problems are compounded by the use of networks, which introduce the added complexity of applications on multiple machines interacting in complex scenarios. As a result, many business and home users are hindered from using software-based systems to their fullest potential. More effective use of these systems can be aided by an application which can provide services for monitoring, diagnosing, and solving problems that occur in the operation of the machines at a customer facility. In the system described herein, a database contains entries with executable code that can make use of these services in order to monitor, diagnose, and solve specific problems. Each entry in the database addresses a specific problem. The executable code is designed to isolate and recognize the problem, and then implement a fix or workaround for that problem. The executable code is designed to completely automate the entire process of detection and resolution of the problem. Further, manual intervention may be employed to complete the diagnosis or solution.

Claims

1. A method for resolving problems in software-based systems, comprising:

automating resolving said problems using software;

storing executable code in said local database having a plurality of entries to define said automated resolving;

updating said local database from a central database having a plurality of entries, said updating being initiated automatically without user intervention;

recording a count of said automated resolutions for each entry in said local database;

updating said central database with said count to generate a central total count in said central database of said automated resolutions; and

updating a local total count in said local database from said central total count in said central database as part of said periodic update.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said local database is a relational database.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein said executable code is directly executable machine code.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said executable code is an interpreted representation.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein said updating of said local database is initiated automatically at predetermined intervals.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein said updating of said local database is initiated automatically as a result of said automated resolving failing to succeed.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein said updating of said local database comprises the steps of:

identifying hardware and software components that exist at a local site of said software-based system;

creating a selection from said entries in said central database that corresponds to said hardware and software components; and

modifying said local database to cause it to match said selection.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein said modifying further comprises:

comparing said local database to said selection to determine differences; and

using said differences to perform said modification.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein said comparing further comprises comparing a signature of said local database to a signature of said selection, wherein said signatures are adapted for detecting of said differences between entries.

10. The method of claim 1 additionally comprising:

detecting and said automating resolving; and

updating said local database from a central database initiated automatically without user intervention as the result of said automating resolving failing to succeed.

11. The method of claim 10 further comprising retrying of said automated resolving incorporating said update.

12. The method of claim 11 further comprising automating transmitting of a problem report to a call center if said retry fails to succeed.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein said transmitting of said problem report is via a computer network.

14. The method of claim 12 wherein said transmitting of said problem report is via a pager.

15. The method of claim 12 wherein said transmitting of said problem report further includes transmitting information automatically gathered as a result of said automating resolving.

16. The method of claim 12 wherein said transmitting of said problem report further includes:

transmitting information automatically gathered as a result of said automating resolving, with said information automatically gathered including state information indicative of the creation of an entry in said central database; and

invoking a development tool operable to create executable code as a result of said state information, wherein said state information is provided to a programmer via said development tool for creating executable code adapted to be entered into said central database.

17. The method of claim 16, further comprising the steps of:

manually initiating a connection to said call center; and

using said connection from said call center to manually initiate operations for assisting in the manually diagnosing of said failure of said automated resolution.

18. The method of claim 16, further comprising the steps of:

recording said operations; and

providing said recording to a programmer, through a development tool operable for creating said executable code to be entered into said central database.