System and method for determining quality of written product reviews in an automated manner
First Claim
1. A method for determining quality of user reviews to distinguish the user reviews for further use or processing, said method comprising the steps of:
- parsing text of at least a portion of a user review;
extracting at least one characteristic feature from said user review that is indicative of quality of said user review;
determining at least one quality parameter for said user review based on said extracted characteristic feature;
determining a raw score for said at least one quality parameter; and
determining quality of said user review based on said raw score.
4 Assignments
0 Petitions
Accused Products
Abstract
A system and method for determining quality of written product reviews to distinguish the user reviews for further use or processing. In one embodiment, the opinion analyzer system includes a processor, a parser module, an prose analyzer module, a characteristic features database, and a language value rules database. In another embodiment, the method comprises the steps of parsing language of a portion of a user review, extracting characteristic feature from the user review, determining a quality parameter based on the extracted characteristic feature, determining a raw score based on the quality parameter, and determining quality of the user review based on the raw score.
-
Citations
76 Claims
-
1. A method for determining quality of user reviews to distinguish the user reviews for further use or processing, said method comprising the steps of:
-
parsing text of at least a portion of a user review;
extracting at least one characteristic feature from said user review that is indicative of quality of said user review;
determining at least one quality parameter for said user review based on said extracted characteristic feature;
determining a raw score for said at least one quality parameter; and
determining quality of said user review based on said raw score. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40)
-
-
25. The method of claim 25, wherein said comparative text pattern is at least one of a brand name and a model of said another comparable product.
-
41. A system for determining quality of user reviews to distinguish the user reviews for further use or processing, said system comprising:
-
a processor;
a parser module adapted to parse text of at least a portion of a user review and extract a characteristic feature of said user review that is indicative of quality of said user review; and
a prose analyzer module adapted to determine at least one quality parameter based on said characteristic feature, determine a raw score for said at least one quality parameter, and to determine quality of said user review based on said raw score. - View Dependent Claims (42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69)
-
-
70. A computer readable medium for determining quality of user reviews to distinguish the user reviews for further use or processing, said medium comprising:
-
instructions for parsing text of at least a portion of a user review;
instructions for extracting at least one characteristic feature from said user review that is indicative of quality of said user review;
instructions for determining at least one quality parameter for said user review based on said extracted characteristic feature;
instructions for determining a raw score for said at least one quality parameter; and
instructions for determining quality of said user review based on said raw score. - View Dependent Claims (71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76)
-
Specification