Agent-based personal object management

• US 20050038766A1
• Filed: 08/12/2003
• Published: 02/17/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 08/12/2003
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Lenovo Singapore Pte Limited (Lenovo Group Ltd.)
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Frank, David C., Mohindra, Ajay, Vogl, Norbert G., Naik, Vijay K., Mastrianni, Steven J., Chefalas, Thomas E., Bantz, David F.
• Application Number:
  US10/639,098
• Publication Number:
  US 20050038766A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/10 File systems; File servers

Abstract

This invention provides systems, apparatus and methods for object management, employing agents for all personal computer objects. Personal objects survive in direct proportion to the degree to which they possess attributes that give them a competitive advantage in the use of the computing systems storage and name spaces. It employs an important competitive attribute of future utility. Since it is not always possible to accurately predict future utility, assessment of competitive advantage is based on secondary attributes that can be computed and that correlate with future utility, to a greater or lesser degree. It uses a ‘coordinating mechanic’ that monitors and controls relationships between personal objects and their agents. The term “object management” applies to computer systems, but is not necessarily limited to computer entities

Claims

1. An object management system, said system coupled to a communications fabric, said system comprising:

a plurality of personal objects;

a plurality of agents, each agent associated with a particular personal object from said plurality of personal objects, said each agent providing supervision and maintenance of said particular personal object;

a coordinating mechanic to control each of said plurality of agents, wherein messages between said coordinating mechanic and each of said plurality of agents is transported via said communications fabric;

at least one scoring module to compute a score indicative of a relative probability of future utility of each particular object from said plurality of personal objects; and

a decision module to make system decisions based upon at least said relative probability.

2. An object management system as recited in claim 1, further comprising a survival module allowing a particular object to survive in direct proportion to a degree to which said particular object possesses attributes indicating a competitive advantage in use of computing systems storage and/or name spaces.

3. An object management system as recited in claim 1, wherein said coordinating mechanic includes a plurality of peer mechanics to control said each agent, each peer mechanic being associated with a particular agent.

4. An object management system as recited in claim 1, wherein said at least one scoring module is used by each of the agents.

5. An object management system as recited in claim 1, wherein said coordinating mechanic associates a coefficient for each agent based upon at least one coefficient weighting criterion, said decision module makes system decisions also based upon each said coefficient.

6. An object management system as recited in claim 5, wherein said at least one coefficient weighting criterion includes coefficient weighting criteria taken from a group of coefficient weighting criteria consisting of:

historical accuracy;

agent class;

an agent'"'"'s own confidence estimate; and

any combination of these.

7. An object management system as recited in claim 5, wherein said decision module forms a sum of products of each particular object'"'"'s relative probability and each particular object'"'"'s coefficient.

8. An object management system as recited in claim 1, wherein said messages include messages from each agent to said coordinating mechanic, each message having information taken from a group of information consisting of:

an estimate of future utility of each particular object;

a cost of maintaining each particular object;

a confidence factor of said estimate of future utility of each particular object, and any combination of these.

9. A method as recited in claim 1, further comprising associating at least a portion of said plurality of personal objects with at least one context.

10. A method as recited in claim 9, further comprising creating said at least one context based on execution of a task, wherein each context forming a groups of objects such that all of the objects in said group of objects are associated with said task.

11. A method as recited in claim 5, further comprising creating at least one other object in response to a user'"'"'s assumption of a new task.

12. A method as recited in claim 1, wherein said relative probability is a measure of a future utility level of said particular object.

13. A method as recited in claim 1, wherein at least one of said plurality of agents provides at least one explanation of information computed by said each agent.

14. A method as recited in claim 1, wherein at least one of said plurality of agents and said coordinating mechanic is provided by a service.

15. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein said coordinating mechanic is provided by a Web service.

20. A computer program product comprising a computer usable medium having computer readable program code means embodied therein for causing object management, the computer readable program code means in said computer program product comprising computer readable program code means for causing a computer to effect the functions of claim 1.

16. A method comprising:

providing a plurality of personal objects;

forming a plurality of agents, each agent being associated with a particular personal object from said plurality of personal objects, said each agent providing supervision and maintenance of said particular personal object;

controlling each of said plurality of agents with a coordinating mechanic.

transporting messages between said coordinating mechanic and each of said plurality of agents;

computing a score indicative of a relative probability of future utility of each particular object from said plurality of personal objects; and

making system decisions based upon at least said relative probability.

17. A method as recited in claim 16, further comprising forming said coordinating mechanic as a global mechanic.

18. An article of manufacture comprising a computer usable medium having computer readable program code means embodied therein for causing object management, the computer readable program code means in said article of manufacture comprising computer readable program code means for causing a computer to effect the steps of claim 16.

19. A program storage device readable by machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine to perform method steps for object management, said method steps comprising the steps of claim 16.

21. An architecture comprising a computer system comprising:

a plurality of personal objects;

a plurality of agents, each of said agents being associated with and being coupled to a unique personal object from said plurality of personal objects, each agent providing supervision and maintenance of said unique personal object;

a coordinating mechanic for controlling each of said plurality of agents;

a communications fabric coupled to said coordinating mechanic for transporting messages between said coordinating mechanic and each of said plurality of agents;

at least one scoring module coupled to said communications fabric for computing a score indicative of a relative probability of future utility of each particular object from said plurality of personal objects; and

a decision module coupled to said communications fabric for making system decisions based upon at least said relative probability.

22. An architecture as recited in claim 21, further comprising a survival module allowing a particular object to survive in direct proportion to a degree to which said particular object possesses attributes indicating a competitive advantage in use of computing systems storage and name spaces.

23. An architecture as recited in claim 21, wherein said coordinating mechanic is formed by a plurality of peer mechanics to control said each agent, each peer mechanic being associated with a particular agent.

24. An architecture as recited in claim 21, wherein said coordinating mechanic is coupled to each of said plurality of agents.