Method and apparatus for support of bottleneck avoidance in an intelligent adapter

• US 20050050187A1
• Filed: 09/03/2003
• Published: 03/03/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 09/03/2003
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Tracey, John Michael, Sahu, Sambit, Pradhan, Prashant, Freimuth, Douglas Morgan, Mraz, Ronald, Nahum, Erich
• Application Number:
  US10/654,069
• Publication Number:
  US 20050050187A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/223
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/15 in relation to multipoint traffic arrangements for broadcast or multicast in data networks H04L12/18
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/26 using explicit feedback to the source, e.g. choke packets
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/283 in response to processing delays, e.g. caused by jitter or round trip time [RTT]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/29 using a combination of thresholds
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/70 Admission control; Resource allocation
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/745 Reaction in network
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/822 Collecting or measuring resource availability data

Abstract

A mechanism for bottleneck avoidance is provided in an intelligent adapter. The mechanism allows the adapter to be used such that host/adapter system throughput is optimized. The bottleneck avoidance mechanism of the present invention determines when the adapter becomes a bottleneck. If certain conditions exist, then new connections are refused so that the adapter can process packets for existing connections. If certain other conditions exist, the adapter may migrate workload to the host processor for processing. These conditions may be determined by comparing memory usage or central processing unit usage to predetermined thresholds. Alternatively, the conditions may be determined by comparing adapter response time to host response time.

Claims

1. A method for bottleneck avoidance in an adapter, the method comprising:

receiving workload at an adapter connected to a host, wherein the adapter includes adapter memory and an adapter processor and wherein the host includes a host processor;

determining whether the adapter is a bottleneck;

responsive to a determination that the adapter is a bottleneck, refusing the workload; and

responsive to a determination that the adapter is not a bottleneck, accepting the workload for processing by the adapter.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining whether the adapter is a bottleneck includes:

determining whether adapter memory usage exceeds a first threshold.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining whether the adapter is a bottleneck includes:

determining whether adapter processor usage exceeds a second threshold.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining whether the adapter is a bottleneck includes:

determining whether a response time for the adapter exceeds a response time for the host.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining whether the adapter is overloaded; and

responsive to a determination that the adapter is overloaded, migrating workload from the adapter to the host.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the step of determining whether the adapter is overloaded includes:

determining whether adapter processor usage exceeds a third threshold.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein the step of determining whether the adapter is overloaded includes:

determining whether a response time for the adapter exceeds a response time for the host by a fourth threshold.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the adapter is a network interface.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the workload includes network protocol processing.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein the network interface is capable of full network protocol offload.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of accepting the workload for processing by the adapter includes accepting the workload based on a probability distribution function.

12. A data processing system, comprising:

a host processor;

a network interface, connected to the host processor, wherein the network interface performs network protocol processing for the host processor, wherein the network interface includes an interface memory and a network processor, and wherein the network interface receives workload, determines whether the network interface is a bottleneck, refuses the workload responsive to a determination that the network interface is a bottleneck, and accepts the workload for processing by the network processor responsive to a determination that the network interface is not a bottleneck.

13. The data processing system of claim 12, wherein the network interface determines whether the network interface is overloaded and migrates workload from the network interface to the host processor responsive to a determination that the network interface is overloaded.

14. The data processing system of claim 12, wherein the network interface is capable of full network protocol processing offload.

15. The data processing system of claim 12, wherein the network interface is capable of partial network protocol processing offload.

16. A computer program product, in a computer readable medium, for bottleneck avoidance in an adapter, the computer program product comprising:

instructions for receiving workload at an adapter connected to a host, wherein the adapter includes adapter memory and an adapter processor and wherein the host includes a host processor;

instructions for determining whether the adapter is a bottleneck;

instructions, responsive to a determination that the adapter is a bottleneck, for refusing the workload; and

instructions, responsive to a determination that the adapter is not a bottleneck, for accepting the workload for processing by the adapter.

17. The computer program product of claim 16, wherein the instructions for determining whether the adapter is a bottleneck include:

instructions for determining whether adapter memory usage exceeds a first threshold.

18. The computer program product of claim 16, wherein the instructions for determining whether the adapter is a bottleneck include:

instructions for determining whether adapter processor usage exceeds a second threshold.

19. The computer program product of claim 16, wherein the instructions for determining whether the adapter is a bottleneck include:

instructions for determining whether a response time for the adapter exceeds a response time for the host.

20. The computer program product of claim 16, further comprising:

instructions for determining whether the adapter is overloaded; and

instructions, responsive to a determination that the adapter is overloaded, for migrating workload from the adapter to the host.

21. The computer program product of claim 20, wherein the instructions for determining whether the adapter is overloaded include:

instructions for determining whether adapter processor usage exceeds a third threshold.

22. The computer program product of claim 20, wherein the instructions for determining whether the adapter is overloaded include:

instructions for determining whether a response time for the adapter exceeds a response time for the host by a fourth threshold.

23. The computer program product of claim 16, wherein the adapter is a network interface.

24. The computer program product of claim 23, wherein the workload includes network protocol processing.

25. The computer program product of claim 23, wherein the network interface is capable of full network protocol offload.

26. The computer program product of claim 16, wherein the workload is accepted based on a probability distribution function.