Method and system to manage a network connection application

• US 20050055371A1
• Filed: 06/05/2003
• Published: 03/10/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 06/05/2003
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Ipass Incorporated (Pareteum Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Ipass Incorporated (Pareteum Corp.)
• Inventors: Sunder, Singam, Albert, Roy David, Edgett, Jeff
• Application Number:
  US10/456,159
• Publication Number:
  US 20050055371A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/14 Session management for real-time applications in data packet communications networks H04L65/1066
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 9/40 Network security protocols

Abstract

A method and system is provided for managing a network connection application. The method includes assigning a plurality of selection criteria to each connection point wherein each selection criteria bearing an associated selection weight. The connection points are then arranged in a prioritized order in a priority list used by the connection application to connect to any one of the connection points. The prioritized order is based on the selection criteria and associated selection weights. The prioritized list is then made available for use by the connection application. Each selection criteria may have an associated weight bias that influences the priority of the connection point. In certain embodiments, criteria and weight bias on the connection application may be updated or modified.

Claims

1. A method for managing a network connection application, the method including:

assigning a plurality of selection criteria to each connection point, each selection criteria bearing an associated selection weight;

arranging the connection points in a prioritized order in a priority list used by the connection application to connect to any one of the connection points, the prioritized order being based on the selection criteria and associated selection weights; and

making the prioritized list available for use by the connection application.

2. The method of claim 1, which includes associating a weight bias with each selection weight, the weight bias influencing the priority of the connection point.

3. The method of claim 2, which includes normalizing the selection weights.

4. The method of claim 2, which includes:

multiplying each weight by its associated bias; and

obtaining the sum of the resultant biased weights to define a preference indicator that determines the order of each connection point in the priority list.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the selection criteria are selected from the group including the price, network connection performance data, profit margin, service commitment associated with the connection point, a user error, a software error, a hardware error, and a network error.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the network connection performance data includes one of connection speed and throughput.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein the price criteria is a price of the particular connection point relative to the price of all connection points in a particular pricing plan.

8. The method of claim 5, wherein the network connection performance data include connection quality criteria.

9. The method of claim 5, wherein the network connection performance data includes speed criteria defined as a speed of the associated connection point relative to a speed of all connection points.

10. The method of claim 5, wherein the profit margin criteria is defined as a margin available on the associated connection point relative to a margin available on all connection points in a particular pricing plan.

11. The method of claim 5, wherein the provider commitment is defined as a percentage of commitment remaining in a period relative to all other commitments in the period.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the provider selector weight is integer assigned by a roaming access service provider.

13. The method of claim 1, which includes:

storing the prioritized list in a client file; and

publishing the client file on a web server for downloading by the connection application.

14. The method of claim 1, which includes diversifying the connection points in the priority list so that connection points from a plurality of service providers are provided to a user.

15. The method of claim 1, which includes:

collecting network connection performance data; and

modifying the prioritized order in the priority list based on the network connection performance data.

16. A method for managing a network connection application, the method including:

assigning at least one selection criteria to each connection point, the selection criteria being associated with a financial consideration; and

arranging the connection points in a prioritized order in a priority list used by the connection application to connect to any one of the connection points, the prioritized order being based on the selection criteria.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein each selection criteria bears an associated selection weight and the prioritized order is based on the selection criteria and the selection weight.

18. The method of claim 17, which includes associating a weight bias with each selection weight, the weight bias influencing the priority of the connection point.

19. The method of claim 17, which includes normalizing the selection weights.

20. The method of claim 18, which includes:

multiplying each weight by its associated bias; and

obtaining the sum of the resultant biased weights to define a priority indicator that determines the order of each connection point in the priority list.

21. The method of claim 16, wherein the selection criteria are associated with at least one financial consideration selected from the group including price, profit margin and service commitment associated with the connection point.

22. The method of claim 16, which includes:

collecting network connection performance data; and

modifying the prioritized order in the priority list based on the network connection performance data.

29. The system of claim 20, wherein the connection points are diversified in the priority list so that connection points from a plurality of service providers are provided to a user.

23. A management system to manage a connection application, the system including:

a network interface to interface the management system to a network providing a plurality of network connection points via which a client machine can connect to the network using the connection application; and

a server machine connected to the network, wherein the server machine assigns a plurality of selection criteria to each connection point, each selection criteria bearing an associated selection weight and the connection points are arranged in a prioritized order in a priority list used by the connection application to connect to any one of the connection points, the prioritized order being based on the selection criteria and associated selection weights.

24. The system of claim 23, wherein a weight bias is associated with each selection weight, the weight bias influencing the priority of the connection point.

25. The system of claim 24, wherein the selection weights are normalized.

26. The system of claim 24, wherein each weight multiplied by its associated bias, and the sum of the resultant biased weights defines a preference indicator that determines the order of each connection point in the priority list.

27. The system of claim 23, wherein the selection criteria are selected from the group including the price, quality, speed, profit margin, and service commitment associated with the connection point.

28. The system of claim 23, which includes a web server, the prioritized list being stored in a client file that is published on the web server for downloading by the connection application.

30. The system of claim 23, wherein:

network connection performance data is collected; and

the order in the priority list is prioritized based on the network connection performance data.

31. A management system to manage a connection application, the system including:

a network interface to interface the management system to a network providing a plurality of network connection points via which a client machine can connect to the network using the connection application; and

a server machine connected to the network, wherein the server machine assigns a plurality of selection criteria to each connection point, each selection criteria bearing an associated financial consideration and the connection points are arranged in a prioritized order in a priority list used by the connection application to connect to any one of the connection points, the prioritized order being based on the selection criteria.

32. The system of claim 31, wherein each selection criteria bears an associated selection weight and the prioritized order is based on the selection criteria and the selection weight.

33. The system of claim 32, wherein a weight bias is associated with each selection weight, the weight bias influencing the priority of the connection point.

34. The system of claim 32, wherein the selection weights are normalized.

35. The system of claim 33, wherein each weight is multiplied by its associated bias, and the sum of the resultant biased weights defines a priority indicator that determines the order of each connection point in the priority list.

36. The system of claim 31, wherein the selection criteria are associated with at least one financial consideration selected from the group including price, profit margin and service commitment associated with the connection point.

37. A machine-readable medium embodying a sequence of instructions that, when executed by a machine, cause the machine to:

assign a plurality of selection criteria to each connection point, each selection criteria bearing an associated selection weight;

arrange the connection points in a prioritized order in a priority list used by the connection application to connect to any one of the connection points, the prioritized order being based on the selection criteria and associated selection weights; and

make the prioritized list available for use by the connection application.

38. The machine-readable medium of claim 37, wherein a weight bias is associated with each selection weight, the weight bias influencing the priority of the connection point.

39. The machine-readable medium of claim 38, wherein the weights are normalized weights and each normalized weight is multiplied by its associated bias, and the sum of the resultant biased weights defining a preference indicator that determines the order of each connection point in the priority list.

40. The machine-readable medium of claim 37, wherein the selection criteria are selected from the group including the price, network connection performance data, profit margin, and service commitment associated with the connection point.

41. A machine-readable medium embodying a sequence of instructions that, when executed by a machine, cause the machine to:

assigns at least one selection criteria to each connection point, the selection criteria being associated with a financial consideration; and

arrange the connection points in a prioritized order in a priority list used by the connection application to connect to any one of the connection points, the prioritized order being based on the selection criteria.

42. The machine-readable medium of claim 41, wherein each selection criteria has an associated selection weight and the prioritized order is based on the selection criteria and the selection weight.

43. The machine-readable medium of claim 42, which includes associating a weight bias with each selection weight, the weight bias influencing the priority of the connection point.

44. A management system to manage a connection application, the system including:

network interface means for interfacing the management system to a network providing a plurality of network connection points via which a client machine can connect to the network using the connection application; and

server means connected to the network and for assigning a plurality of selection criteria to each connection point, each selection criteria bearing an associated financial consideration and the connection points are arranged in a prioritized order in a priority list used by the connection application to connect to any one of the connection points, the prioritized order being based on the selection criteria.