Prioritized presentation of medical device events

• US 20050060186A1
• Filed: 08/28/2003
• Published: 03/17/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 08/28/2003
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Medtronic Incorporated (Medtronic Plc)
• Original Assignee: Medtronic Incorporated (Medtronic Plc)
• Inventors: Blowers, Paul A., Protas, Cheryl J., Sherman, William M., Lauer, Joel R., Willenbring, James E., Manrodt, Christopher M., Padmanabhan, Seema
• Application Number:
  US10/650,497
• Publication Number:
  US 20050060186A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/2
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 20/30 relating to physical therapies or activities, e.g. physiotherapy, acupressure or exercising
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/67 for remote operation

Abstract

In general, the invention is directed to techniques for prioritized presentation of implantable medical device (IMD) events based on relative importance. Given a prioritization of events, the techniques permit presentation of events in an order or format that directs a clinician'"'"'s attention to important events. In some embodiments, a clinician simultaneously views events obtained from multiple IMDs associated with multiple patients, e.g., via single user interface, and is aided by an order or format of presentation that reflects event prioritization. In some cases, an IMD event with a priority above a predetermined threshold triggers special actions. As one example, an event with a high relative importance may be presented using a conspicuous text format. As another example, an event with a priority above the threshold may trigger a notification to a clinician, or other persons.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

prioritizing events obtained from interrogation of a medical device implanted in a patient, wherein the events include therapy events and diagnostic events; and

presenting a list of the events based on the prioritization.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

prioritizing events obtained from a plurality of medical devices implanted in different patients; and

presenting a list of the patients and a list of the events for each of the patients based on the prioritization.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein prioritizing events includes prioritizing the events based on a relative importance associated with the events.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising invoking a special action in response to an event with a relative importance that exceeds a threshold.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the special action comprises using a conspicuous text format when presenting data from the event.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the conspicuous text format includes one of font, bold text, highlighted text, underlined text, and italicized text.

7. The method of claim 4, wherein the special action includes generating an alarm, notifying a clinician, and notifying a patient.

8. A method comprising:

interrogating a medical device implanted in a patient;

receiving event data, wherein the event data describes one of a therapy event and a diagnostic event;

assigning a relative importance to each of the events.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising prioritizing events obtained from the interrogation based on the relative importance.

10. The method of claim 8, further comprising assigning the relative importance based on a set of rules.

11. The method of claim 8, further comprising presenting a prioritized list of the events based on the relative importance.

12. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

prioritizing events obtained from a plurality of medical devices implanted in different patients; and

presenting a list of the patients and a prioritized list of the events for each of the patients based on the relative importance.

13. The method of claim 8, further comprising invoking a special action in response to an event with an relative importance that exceeds a threshold.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the special action comprises using a conspicuous text format when presenting data from the event.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the conspicuous text format includes one of bold text, highlighted text, underlined text, and italicized text.

16. The method of claim 13, wherein the special action includes generating an alarm, notifying a clinician, and notifying a patient.

17. A system comprising:

a prioritization engine to prioritize events obtained from interrogation of a medical device implanted in a patient, wherein the events include therapy events and diagnostic events; and

a user interface device to present a list of the events based on the prioritization.

18. The system of claim 17, further comprising a data management application that parses raw data from the implantable medical device, and populates fields of a database with event data.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the event data comprises one of patient name, device type, date event data was parsed, and event type.

20. The system of claim 17, further comprising a database to store the prioritized events, wherein the user interface device includes a web browser to access the prioritized events via a network connection.

21. The system of claim 20, further comprising a derivation engine to generate additional events based on the stored events.

22. The system of claim 17, further comprising a rule engine to assign relative importance to the events based on rules from a rule database.

23. The system of claim 17, wherein the prioritization engine prioritizes events obtained from a plurality of medical devices implanted in different patients, and the user interface presents a list of the patients and a list of the events for each of the patients based on the prioritization.

24. The system of claim 17, wherein the prioritization engine prioritizes the events based on a relative importance associated with the events.

25. The system of claim 17, further comprising a notification device to perform a special action in response to an event with relative importance that exceeds a threshold, wherein the relative importance is assigned to the event based on a level of priority for the event.

26. The system of claim 25, wherein the special action comprises one of using a conspicuous text format when presenting data from the event.

27. The system of claim 26, wherein the conspicuous text format includes one of bold text, highlighted text, underlined text, and italicized text.

28. The system of claim 25, wherein the special action includes generating an alarm, notifying a clinician, and notifying a patient.

44. The system of claim 17, wherein the prioritization engine prioritizes events obtained from a plurality of medical devices implanted in different patients.

29. A computer-readable medium comprising instructions for causing a programmable processor to:

prioritize events obtained from interrogation of a medical device implanted in a patient, wherein the events include therapy events and diagnostic events; and

present a list of the events based on the prioritization.

30. The computer-readable medium of claim 29, wherein the instructions cause the processor to:

prioritize events obtained from a plurality of medical devices implanted in different patients; and

present a list of the patients and a list of the events for each of the patients based on the prioritization.

31. The computer-readable medium of claim 29, wherein the instructions cause the processor to prioritize events based on a relative importance associated with the events.

32. The computer-readable medium of claim 29, wherein the instructions cause the processor to invoke a special action in response to an event with relative importance that exceeds a threshold.

33. A computer-readable medium comprising instructions for causing a programmable processor to:

interrogate a medical device implanted in a patient;

receive event data, wherein the event data describes one of a therapy event and a diagnostic event; and

assign a relative importance to each event.

34. The computer-readable medium of claim 33, wherein the instructions cause the processor to prioritize events obtained from interrogation based on relative importance.

35. The computer-readable medium of claim 33, wherein the instructions cause the processor to assign the relative importance based on a set of rules.

36. The computer-readable medium of claim 33, wherein the instructions cause the processor to present a list of the events based on the prioritization.

37. The computer-readable medium of claim 33, wherein the instructions cause the processor to:

prioritize events obtained from a plurality of medical devices implanted in different patients; and

present a list of the patients and a prioritized list of the events for each of the patients based on relative importance.

38. The computer-readable medium of claim 33, wherein the instructions cause the processor to invoke a special action in response to an event with a relative importance that exceeds a threshold, wherein the relative importance is assigned to the event based on a level of priority for the event.

39. A device comprising:

a prioritization engine to prioritize events obtained from interrogation of a medical device implanted in a patient, wherein the events include therapy events and diagnostic events; and

a database to store the prioritized events.

40. The system of claim 39, further comprising a data management application that parses raw data from the implantable medical device, and populates fields of the database with event data.

41. The system of claim 39, wherein the event data comprises one of patient name, device type, date event data was parsed, and event type.

42. The system of claim 39, further comprising a derivation engine to generate additional events based on the stored events.

43. The system of claim 39, further comprising a rule engine to assign relative importance to the events based on rules from a rule database, wherein the prioritization engine prioritizes the events based on the relative importance.