Power flow controller responsive to power circulation demand for optimizing power transfer

• US 20050071050A1
• Filed: 06/29/2004
• Published: 03/31/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 06/30/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
• Original Assignee: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
• Inventors: Wei, Xuan, Edris, Abdel-Aty, Fardanesh, Bruce, Chow, Joe H.
• Granted Patent: US 7,117,070 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 700/286
• CPC Class Codes: G05F 1/70 Regulating power factor; Regulating reactive current or power
• CPC Class Codes: H02J 3/06 Controlling transfer of power between connected networks; Controlling sharing of load between connected networks
• CPC Class Codes: H02J 3/1814 wherein al least one reactive element is actively controlled by a bridge converter, e.g. unified power flow controllers [UPFC]
• CPC Class Codes: Y02E 10/56 Power conversion systems, e.g. maximum power point trackers
• CPC Class Codes: Y02E 40/10 Flexible AC transmission systems [FACTS]

Abstract

A power flow controller responsive to power circulation demand for optimizing power transfer is disclosed. When a power flow controller operates at its rated capacity, it can no longer regulate from-bus voltage set-points, line power flow set-points, or both. In such cases, the power flow controller switches to power circulation set-point control without exceeding the rated capacities of the voltage-sourced converters in the power flow controller. Power-voltage (PV) curves associated with voltage stability analysis for maximizing power transfer can be generated and stored for use with a power flow controller operating in automatic power flow control mode.

Claims

1. A power flow controller, comprising:

a controller responsive to a circulating power demand; and

a first voltage-sourced converter coupled to the controller and adapted to be coupled to a transmission line, the first voltage-sourced converter configured by the controller to control power flow in the transmission line.

2. The power flow controller of claim 1, further comprising:

a second voltage-sourced converter coupled to the first voltage-sourced converter via a direct current link and adapted to be coupled to the transmission line, the second voltage-sourced converter configured by the power controller to control power flow in the transmission line.

3. The power flow controller of claim 1, wherein the circulating power demand is determined in real-time.

4. The power flow controller of claim 1, where the circulating power demand is determined from a look-up table.

5. The power flow controller of claim 1, wherein the circulating power demand is determined automatically and continuously using a closed-loop feedback system.

6. The power flow controller of claim 1, wherein the controller implements a vector control scheme that regulates transmission line current using a synchronous reference frame.

7. The power flow controller of claim 2, wherein the first and second voltage-sourced converters are configured as a Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC).

8. The power flow controller of claim 7, wherein the first voltage-sourced converter is operating at MVA rating and the circulating power demand P_cd is based on a solution to a set of loadflow equations given by

{square root}{square root over (P_se²+Q_se²)}=S_{se max},

wherein Q_se is given by

$Q_{\mathrm{se}}=\frac{-(V_1}{}$

( V 1 - V m2 ⁢

cos ⁡

( θ

1 - α

2 ) ) + V 2 ⁡

( V 2 + V m2 ⁢

cos ⁡

( θ

2 - α

2 ) ) ) X t2 , ⁢

and ⁢

 

⁢

P se = P cd ,

and a second set of load flow equations for the second voltage-sourced converter given by

V₁=V_1d
and
P_sh=−

P_cd.

9. The power flow controller of claim 7, wherein the first voltage source converter is operating at a voltage magnitude limit V_m2max, and the circulating power demand P_cd is based on a solution to a first set of loadflow equations given by

V_m2=V_m2max
P_se=P_cd, and

a second set of load flow equations for the second voltage-sourced converter given by

V₁=V_1d
and
P_sh=−

P_cd.

10. The power flow controller of claim 7, wherein the second voltage-sourced converter is operating at MVA rating and the circulating power demand P_cd is based on a solution to a set of loadflow equations given by

{square root}{square root over (P_sh²+Q_sh²)}=S_{sh max},

wherein Q_sh is given by

$Q_{\mathrm{sh}}=\frac{-V_1}{}$

( V m1 ⁢

cos ⁡

( θ

- α

1 ) - V 1 ) X t1 , and ⁢

 

⁢

P sh = - P cd ,

and a second set of loadflow equations for the second voltage-sourced converter given by

$\frac{V_2<br><br>\left(V_{\mathrm{m2}}<br><br>\sin <br><br>\left({\mathrm{\theta <br><br>}}_2-{\mathrm{\alpha <br><br>}}_2\right)-V_1<br><br>\sin <br><br>\left({\mathrm{\theta <br><br>}}_2-{\mathrm{\theta <br><br>}}_1\right)\right)}{X_{\mathrm{t2}}}=P_d,\mathrm{and}<br><br>\text{\hspace{1em}<br><br>}<br><br>P_{\mathrm{se}}=P_{\mathrm{cd}}.$

11. The power flow controller of claim 7, wherein the second voltage-sourced converter is operating at a current magnitude limit I_{sh max}, and the circulating power demand P_cd is based on a solution to a first set of loadflow equations given by

$\frac{}{}$

V1⁢

ɛ

j⁢

 

⁢

θ

1-Vm1⁢

ɛ

j⁢

 

⁢

α

1

Xt1=Ish⁢

 

⁢

max
P_sh=−

P_cd, and

a second set of loadflow equations for the second voltage-sourced converter given by

$\frac{V_2<br><br>\left(V_{\mathrm{m2}}<br><br>\sin <br><br>\left({\mathrm{\theta <br><br>}}_2-{\mathrm{\alpha <br><br>}}_2\right)-V_1<br><br>\sin <br><br>\left({\mathrm{\theta <br><br>}}_2-{\mathrm{\theta <br><br>}}_1\right)\right)}{X_{\mathrm{t2}}}=P_d,\mathrm{and}<br><br>\text{\hspace{1em}<br><br>}<br><br>P_{\mathrm{se}}=P_{\mathrm{cd}}.$

12. The power flow controller of claim 7, wherein the first and second voltage-sourced converters are operating at MVA rating and the circulating power demand P_cd is based on a solution to a set of loadflow equations given by

°

{square root over (P_se²+Q_se²)}=S_{se max},

wherein Q_se is given by

$Q_{\mathrm{se}}=\frac{-\left(V_1<br><br>\left(V_1-V_{\mathrm{m2}}<br><br>\cos <br><br>\left({\mathrm{\theta <br><br>}}_1-{\mathrm{\alpha <br><br>}}_2\right)\right)+V_2<br><br>\left(V_2+V_{\mathrm{m2}}<br><br>\cos <br><br>\left({\mathrm{\theta <br><br>}}_2-{\mathrm{\alpha <br><br>}}_2\right)\right)\right)}{X_{\mathrm{t2}}},<br><br>\sqrt{P_{\mathrm{sh}}^2+Q_{\mathrm{sh}}^2}=S_{\mathrm{sh}<br><br>\text{\hspace{1em}<br><br>}<br><br>\max },$

wherein Q_sh is given by

$Q_{\mathrm{sh}}=\frac{-V_1<br><br>\left(V_{\mathrm{m1}}<br><br>\cos <br><br>\left(\mathrm{\theta <br><br>}-{\mathrm{\alpha <br><br>}}_1\right)-V_1\right)}{X_{\mathrm{t1}}},$

P_sh=−

P_cd, and
P_se=P_cd.

13. The power flow controller of claim 7, wherein the first voltage-sourced converter is operating at a voltage magnitude limit V_{m2 max} and the second voltage-sourced converter is operating at a current magnitude limit I_{sh max}, and the circulating power demand P_cd is based on a solution to a set of loadflow equations given by

$V_{\mathrm{m2}}=V_{\mathrm{m2}}$

 

⁢

max , ⁢



V 1 ⁢

ɛ

j ⁢

 

⁢

θ

1 - V m1 ⁢

ɛ

j ⁢

 

⁢

α

1 

X t1 = I sh ⁢

 

⁢

max , ⁢

P se = P cd , and ⁢

 

⁢

P se = P cd .

14. The power flow controller of claim 2, wherein the first and second voltage-sourced converters are configured as an Interline Power Flow Controller (IPFC).

15. The power flow controller of claim 2, wherein the first and second voltage-sourced converters are configured as a Generalized Unified Power Flow Controller (GUPFC).

16. A method of controlling power flow in a transmission line using a power flow controller operated at rated capacity, comprising:

determining if a power flow controller coupled to the transmission line is operating at rated capacity;

determining a circulating power demand in response to the power flow controller operating at rated capacity; and

configuring the power flow controller based on the circulating power demand to control power flow in the transmission line.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the step of determining the circulating power demand further comprises:

determining a desired voltage-stability margin for a bus on the transmission line;

determining a power flow adjustment that will maintain the desired voltage-stability margin on the bus; and

determining a circulating power demand that will provide the maximum power flow adjustment while maintaining the desired voltage-stability margin on the bus.

18. The method claim 16, wherein the circulating power demand is determined from predetermined voltage collapse curves.

19. The method claim 16, wherein circulating power demand is determined automatically from predetermined voltage collapse curves.

20. A computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions which, when executed by a processor in a power flow control system coupled to a transmission line, causes the processor to perform the operations of:

determining a desired voltage-stability margin for a bus on the transmission line;

determining a power flow adjustment that will maintain the desired voltage-stability margin on the bus; and

determining a circulating power demand that will provide the maximum power flow adjustment while maintaining the desired voltage-stability margin on the bus.

21. The computer-readable medium of claim 20, wherein the circulating power demand is determined from predetermined voltage collapse curves.

22. The computer-readable medium of claim 20, wherein circulating power demand is determined automatically from a look-up table.

23. A system for controlling power flow in a transmission line using a power flow controller operated at rated capacity, comprising:

means for determining if a power flow controller coupled to the transmission line is operating at rated capacity;

means for determining a circulating power demand in response to the power flow controller operating at rated capacity; and

means for configuring the power flow controller based on the circulating power demand to control power flow in the transmission line.