Risk assessment system and method of adjusting standard

• US 20050075972A1
• Filed: 10/05/2004
• Published: 04/07/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 10/06/2003
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Corporate Integration Systems Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Corporate Integration Systems Incorporated
• Inventors: Doyle, Thomas James
• Application Number:
  US10/957,660
• Publication Number:
  US 20050075972A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/38
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/03 Credit; Loans; Processing thereof
• CPC Class Codes: Y02P 90/80 Management or planning

Abstract

A method and system of assessing the risk of using industrial equipment to a user allows inputs to be made to a program electronically. When the appropriate inputs have been entered for a plurality of risk factors relating to the industrial equipment, the program will estimate a net risk of injury to the user based on the information inputted and based on evaluation data within the program. The risk evaluation is determined automatically by the program.

Claims

1. A method of assessing the risk of using industrial equipment to a user thereof by preparing a risk evaluation using a program, said method comprising:

(a) choosing a safeguard performance standard for said risk evaluation;

(b) inputting to said program information relating to a plurality of risk factors;

(c) causing said program to estimate a net risk of injury to said user of said industrial equipment based on said information and based on evaluation data within said program;

(d) said program producing a risk evaluation for said industrial equipment;

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 including the step of choosing said performance standard from a pre-determined list of performance standards.

3. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein said industrial equipment has a plurality of points of operation and said method includes the step of choosing one safeguard performance standard for each point of operation.

4. A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein said method includes the step of choosing a safeguard performance standard for each point of operation where the performance standard for one point of operation of said plurality of operations is different from the performance standard for another point of operation of said points of operation.

5. A method as claimed in claim 3 including the step of choosing at least one of said performance standards from a group of CSA, ANSI/RIA and ISO standards

6. A method as claimed in claim 3 including the step of choosing at least one performance standard from the group of CSA Z432-04, EN954-97, ANSI/RIA 1506-99, ISO 13849-1:

1999 and CSA Z434-03.

7. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein one of said plurality of risk factors is based on safety characteristics of a particular facility in which said industrial equipment is to be used, said method including the step of estimating a level of risk reduction based on safety characteristics of said particular facility.

8. A method as claimed in claim 7 including the step of repeating the method for various pieces of industrial equipment, the risk evaluation being produced automatically.

9. A method as claimed in claim 7 including the steps of enabling an end user to edit said program by adding input options through text editing from said end user and having said system recognize said options.

10. A method as claimed in claim 7 wherein said program has inputs relating to task hazards, said method including the step of adding said input options to said task hazards in said program.

11. A method as claimed in claim 10 including the step of revising said input options.

12. A method as claimed in claim 10 including the step of adding said input options in relation to personal protective equipment.

13. A method as claimed in claim 7 including the step of inputting information of risk factors that increase risk together with risk factors that reduce risk.

14. A method as claimed in claim 13 including the steps of inputting information by estimating a risk of injury to said user based upon characteristics of said industrial equipment and estimating a level of risk reduction based upon safety features for said industrial equipment.

15. A method as claimed in claim 14 including the steps of the inputting to a program information relating to a plurality of risk factors by operating said program to produce several factors, each risk factor for which an input is available having a range of risk, selecting a level of risk from said range of risk for each risk factor that is applicable to said industrial equipment, said program estimating a net risk of injury to said user based upon said selections.

16. A risk assessment system for use with a computer, said system assessing the risk of injury to a user from industrial equipment by preparing a risk evaluation, said system comprising:

(a) a range of pre-determined risk values for each of a plurality of potential risk factors for which inputs are available for said industrial equipment;

(b) said system displaying each of said risk factors on demand and a range of inputs for a level of risk for each of said risk factors for which inputs are available;

(c) said system accepting an input for each risk factor for which inputs are available;

(d) said system determining a net value for all of said inputs and producing an assessment of risk for said industrial equipment;

(e) a selection for at least one safeguard performance standard for said risk evaluation.

17. A risk assessment system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said performance standard is available from a pre-determined list of performance standards within said program.

18. A risk assessment system as claimed in claim 17 wherein said industrial equipment has a plurality of points of operation and each point of operation has a safeguard performance standard.

19. A risk assessment system as claimed in claim 17 wherein said performance standard for one point of operation of said plurality of operations is different from a performance standard for another point of operation of said points of operation.

20. A risk assessment system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said performance standards are selected from a pre-determined list including at least one standard that is applicable in a jurisdiction where said user carries on business.

21. A risk assessment system as claimed in claim 16 wherein one of said risk factors is a level of risk reduction based on safety characteristics of a particular facility in which said industrial equipment is to be used.

22. A risk assessment system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said system produces a report setting out a risk evaluation for said industrial equipment, said system being set up to automatically determine a net value for all of said inputs and produce and assessment of risk for said industrial equipment.

23. A risk assessment system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said report is a printable report and includes said performance standard.

24. A risk assessment system as claimed in claim 18 wherein the performance standards for each point of operation are selected from the group of CSA Z432-04, End954-97, ANSI/RIA 1506-99, ISO 13849-1:

1999 and CSA Z434-03.

25. A risk assessment system as claimed in claim 16 wherein said system has an end user editing feature that allows said end user to edit said program by adding input options through text editing, said program recognizing said options.

26. A risk assessment system wherein said input options relate to task hazards.

27. A risk assessment system for use with a computer, said system assessing the risk of injury to a user from industrial equipment by preparing a risk evaluation, said system comprising:

(a) a range of pre-determined risk values for each of a plurality of potential risk factors for which inputs are available for said industrial equipment;

(b) said system displaying each of said risk factors on demand and a range of inputs for a level of risk for each of said risk factors for which inputs are available;

(c) said system accepting an input for each risk factor for which inputs are available;

(d) said system determining a net value for all of said inputs and producing an assessment of risk for said industrial equipment;

(e) at least one of a choice of a safeguard performance standard for said assessment and an end user editing feature that allows said end user to edit said program by adding input options through text editing, said system recognizing said options.