Allele assignment and probe selection in multiplexed assays of polymorphic targets

• US 20050089916A1
• Filed: 10/26/2004
• Published: 04/28/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 10/28/2003
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: BioArray Solutions Limited (Werfen SA)
• Original Assignee: BioArray Solutions Limited (Werfen SA)
• Inventors: Seul, Michael, Xia, Xiongwu
• Application Number:
  US10/975,025
• Publication Number:
  US 20050089916A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 435/6
• CPC Class Codes: C12Q 1/6827 for detection of mutation or polymorphism
• CPC Class Codes: C12Q 1/6832 Enhancement of hybridisation reaction
• CPC Class Codes: C12Q 2535/131 Allele specific probes
• CPC Class Codes: C12Q 2537/143 Multiplexing, i.e. use of multiple primers or probes in a single reaction, usually for simultaneously analyse of multiple analysis
• CPC Class Codes: C12Q 2537/165 Mathematical modelling, e.g. logarithm, ratio
• CPC Class Codes: G16B 20/00 ICT specially adapted for functional genomics or proteomics, e.g. genotype-phenotype associations
• CPC Class Codes: G16B 20/20 Allele or variant detection, e.g. single nucleotide polymorphism [SNP] detection
• CPC Class Codes: G16B 25/00 ICT specially adapted for hybridisation; ICT specially adapted for gene or protein expression
• CPC Class Codes: G16B 25/20 Polymerase chain reaction [PCR]; Primer or probe design; Probe optimisation
• CPC Class Codes: G16B 30/00 ICT specially adapted for sequence analysis involving nucleotides or amino acids
• CPC Class Codes: G16B 30/10 Sequence alignment; Homology search

Abstract

A method to select a set of probes for multiplexed hybridization analysis of genes with multiple polymorphic regions, which minimizes ambiguities (where the assay results can correspond with more than one allele combination) by one or more of several methods, including: eliminating probes which generate ambiguities; setting a threshold such that only probe-target interactions above the threshold are considered as positive; selectively adding probes until ambiguities are eliminated.

Claims

1. A method for reducing erroneous allele assignments where assignment is made based on the results of a hybridization assay between oligonucleotide probes and oligonucleotide targets, and where several polymorphic loci of interest are present on each allele, comprising:

(i) selecting a set of primers for generating targets derived from genomic regions which include the polymorphic loci;

(ii) selecting a set of probes capable of hybridizing to subsequences in the targets, where the subsequences include nucleotides which are either complementary to or the same as a particular polymorphic locus;

(iii) determining whether the selected probes will—

when placed under suitable hybridization conditions with targets and where hybridization between probes including a particular sequence, and a particular subsequence, is detectable as a reaction (and where the detectable reactions of the probes and the subsequences forms a reaction pattern)—

generate an ambiguous reaction pattern consistent with more than one combination of two or more known alleles, and (a) if there is no ambiguity, selecting the probe set for analysis of samples from subjects; and

(b) if there is ambiguity, selecting a different set of probes in step (ii) and repeating step

(iii) to attempt to eliminate the ambiguity;

but if the ambiguity cannot be eliminated, repeating step (i) to (iii) using a different set of primers.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein if there is ambiguity in step (iii)(b), probes are deleted from or added to the probe set.

3. The method of claim 1 further including, following step (iii), performing a simulated hybridization reaction between the selected probes and the targets, at a specified annealing temperature consistent with the expected annealing temperatures of the majority of the probe-subsequence pairs, and wherein for those probe-subsequence pairs which have annealing temperatures such that insignificant annealing is expected to take place at the specified temperature, the corresponding probes are deleted from the probe set and steps (ii) and (iii) are repeated;

and, optionally, if suitable probes cannot be selected after repeating steps (ii) and (iii) one or more times, steps (i) to (iii) are repeated using different primers.

4. The method of claims 1 to 3 further including a step, in the case where steps (i) to (iii) are repeated using different primers, of making the labeling of the different primers distinct from labels associated with the initially selected primers.

5. The method of claim 1 further including a step where known alleles which include the polymorphic loci of interest are aligned to aid in identifying polymorphic loci.

6. A probe set produced by the methods of any of claims 1 to 5.

7. The method of any of claims 1 to 5 wherein in performing step (iii), results from certain probes are ignored and ambiguity is determined based on results from a core set of probes, wherein the core set is a subset of the set of probes.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the set of probes is used if ambiguity is found after using only the core set of probes.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein following determination of the core set of probes, if there is ambiguity, probes are added from the entire probe set to the core set until the ambiguity is eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level.

10. The method of any of claims 1 to 4 or 7 to 9 performed manually or using a software-computer system.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the probe set is generated by the method of claim 1 above.

24. The method of claims 1, 11 or 20 wherein hybridization is detected by detecting labels which are associated with the targets.

25. The method of claim 24 wherein the labels are fluorescent.

26. The method of claims 1, 11 or 20 wherein probes including a particular sequence are all encoded for detection in the same manner.

27. The method of claim 26 wherein the probes including a particular sequence are attached to encoded microparticles.

28. The method of claim 27 wherein the encoding is by color.

11. A method for reducing erroneous allele assignments where assignment is made based on the results of a hybridization assay between oligonucleotide probes and oligonucleotide targets (where the targets are derived from and/or include subsequences complementary to or the same as subsequences in selected alleles, and where the subsequences in the selected alleles include several polymorphic loci) by making allele assignments where mismatches between probes and targets as observed in the hybridization assay, as compared with mismatches predicted between probes and targets, occur at less than a predetermined frequency, comprising:

(i) selecting a set of probes capable of hybridizing to the targets;

(ii) assaying by placing the probes in contact with the targets under hybridizing conditions where hybridization between probes including a particular sequence, and a particular subsequence of the targets, is detectable as a reaction signal of a particular intensity, wherein the intensity is proportional to said hybridizations, and where the detectable signals from reactions of the probes and the target subsequences forms a reaction pattern;

(iii) determining a reference threshold, T, for probes including a particular sequence using the following algorithm;

T_i=R_min+(R<sub>max−

Rmin</sub>)* i/X
S_i=(Σ

((R_k−

T_i)* σ

_k)/Σ

|((R_k−

T_i)|
T=Max (S_i)

Where;

k ranges from 1 to N, and N is the number of probes in the set of probes;

σ

_k=1, when reaction is positive;

σ

_k=−

1, when reaction is negative;

i ranges from 1 to X;

R_k is the ratio of the probe'"'"'s intensity over a known positive control probe intensity;

R_max and R_min are the respective maximum and minimum values for this ratio; and

T_i is a calculated threshold for a probe-target interaction;

(iv) including in the reaction pattern only the signals having intensity greater than or equal to the threshold;

(v) determining the predicted reaction pattern produced by predicting reaction of the probe set with predicted targets which are predicted to be generated by derivation of known allele combinations; and

(vi) comparing the reaction pattern generated by the assay with the predicted reaction pattern, and assigning alleles only if the mismatches between the two patterns occurs at a frequency less than or equal to a specified tolerance level.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the predicted reaction pattern is produced by first determining the predicted reaction patterns of the targets with probes in the probe set, and then determining the predicted reaction pattern for the predicted targets with probes in the probe set.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein the step of determining the predicted reaction pattern includes the step of calculating the predicted reaction pattern for probes in the probe set with targets having subsequences complementary to or the same as subsequences in known alleles.

15. The method of claim 11 wherein following selection of the set of probes in step (i), a subset of the probe set which hybridizes to the targets is designated, and steps (ii) to (vi) are performed using the subset, and allele assignments are made if the hybridization reaction pattern using the subset could only correspond with one unique allele combination, and where mismatches between the reaction pattern and the predicted reaction pattern occur at a frequency less than or equal to a specified tolerance level.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein if the reaction pattern could correspond with more than one known allele combination, steps (ii) to (vi) of claim 11 are performed using the probe set, the allele assignments using the subset and the probe set are compared, and if they are consistent and the hybridization reaction pattern using the probe set could only correspond with one unique allele combination, allele assignments are made.

17. The method of claim 11 further including determining the reliability of the threshold, where the reliability is equal to (S_i+S₂)/(2* S₀), and where:

S₀ is the maximum value of S_i for a given set of samples,

S₁ is the value of S_i when the threshold value increases by a particular percentage, and

S₂ is the value of S_i when the threshold value decreases by the particular percentage.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein the particular percentage is 30%.

19. The method of any of claims 11 to 18 performed manually or using a software-computer system.

20. A method for reducing erroneous allele assignments where assignment is made based on the results of a hybridization assay between oligonucleotide probes and oligonucleotide targets, and where several polymorphic loci of interest are present on each allele, comprising:

(i) selecting a set of primers for generating derived targets from genomic regions which include the polymorphic loci;

(ii) selecting an initial set of probes capable of hybridizing to subsequences in the targets, where the subsequences include nucleotides which are either complementary to or the same as particular polymorphic loci;

(iii) selecting a core probe subset from the initial probe set;

(iv) determining whether the core probe set will—

when placed under suitable hybridization conditions with targets and where hybridization between probes including a particular sequence, and a particular subsequence, is detectable as a reaction (and where the detectable reactions of the probes and the subsequences forms a reaction pattern)—

generate an ambiguous reaction pattern consistent with more than one combination of two or more known alleles, and (a) if there is no ambiguity, or if the ambiguity is acceptable, selecting the core probe set for analysis of samples from subjects;

but (b) if the ambiguity is unacceptable, adding selected probes from the initial probe set to the core probe set and repeating step (iv) following additions to attempt to bring the ambiguity to an acceptable level.

21. The method of claim 20 wherein groups of probes from the initial probe set which all include a particular sequence are added one group at a time.

22. The method of claim 20 wherein one adds the fewest number of selected probes possible to the core probe set in order to eliminate the ambiguity or bring it to an acceptable level.

23. The method of claim 20 further including, following step (iii), performing a simulated hybridization reaction between the selected probes and the targets, at a specified annealing temperature consistent with the expected annealing temperatures of several of the complementary probe-target pairs, but for the complementary probe-target pairs which have annealing temperatures below the specified annealing temperature such that less than an acceptable degree of annealing is expected to take place at the specified temperature, the probes from said complementary probe-target pairs are deleted from the core probe set and step (iv) is repeated with the new core probe set;

but if suitable probes cannot be selected after repeating step (iv), steps (i) to (iv) are repeated using different primers and a different initial probe set.