Spherical modeling tool

• US 20050102316A1
• Filed: 09/10/2004
• Published: 05/12/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 09/10/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Phillip W. Lawson Jr, Robert L. Lindstrom
• Original Assignee: Phillip W. Lawson Jr, Robert L. Lindstrom
• Inventors: Lawson, Phillip W. Jr., Lindstrom, Robert L.
• Granted Patent: US 7,408,554 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 11/206 Drawing of charts or graphs
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 15/00 ICT specially adapted for medical reports, e.g. generation or transmission thereof

Abstract

In one aspect, the invention relates to a method for analyzing qualitative data. The method includes the step of providing a plurality of evaluation categories and a respective ranking system. Providing a closed curvilinear graph in which each unit of radius corresponds to a rank in the ranking system is another step of the method. Another step in the method includes placing each evaluation category at a location on the circumference of the closed curvilinear graph. The steps of the method also include providing the evaluation categories and ranking system to an entity being evaluated. The entity selects a rank in response in each respective category according to the method. Plotting the ranking of each respective category as a node in the closed curvilinear graph in response to the ranking by the entity is another step in the method.

Claims

1. A method for analyzing qualitative data comprising the steps of:

providing a plurality of evaluation categories and a respective ranking system;

providing a closed curvilinear graph in which each unit of radius corresponds to a rank in the ranking system;

placing each evaluation category at a location on the circumference of the closed curvilinear graph;

providing the evaluation categories and ranking system to an entity being evaluated;

having the entity select a rank in response in each respective category; and

plotting the ranking of each respective category as a node in the closed curvilinear graph in response to the ranking by the entity.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the closed curvilinear graph is circular.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the closed curvilinear graph is spherical.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the closed curvilinear graph is ellipsoidal.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the ranking is numerical.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein an expectation value for any category is set between the highest and lowest ranking for the evaluation category.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein each node is in itself a closed curvilinear graph.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the each node is linked to its adjacent nodes.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein each link between nodes is a directed link.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein each directed link is associated with a respective value.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the respective value is a tensegrity factor.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein the qualitative data is data about an entity.

13. The method of claim 1 wherein the qualitative data is data about an organization.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein the qualitative data is ensemble data derived from a plurality of sources.

15. A method of qualitatively comparing the compatibility of two entities comprising the steps of:

providing a plurality of evaluation categories and a respective ranking system;

providing a closed curvilinear graph in which each unit of radius corresponds to a rank in the ranking system;

placing each evaluation category at a location on the circumference of the closed curvilinear graph;

providing the evaluation categories and ranking system to each the entity;

selecting a rank in response to each respective category; and

plotting, for each respective entity, the ranking of each respective category as a node on the closed curvilinear graph in response to the ranking by the entity.

16. The method of claim 15 further comprising the step of determining the similarity between the plotted nodes.

17. The method of claim 15 wherein the entities are companies contemplating merger.

18. The method of claim 15 wherein the entities are individuals in an organization.

19. The method of claim 15 wherein the entities are individuals contemplating starting a company.

20. The method of claim 15 wherein the entities are a company and it proposed investors.

21. The method of claim 15 wherein the results of the plotting is a Spherical Modeling Tool (SMT).

22. The method of claim 15 wherein at least one node corresponds to an SMT.

23. An apparatus for analyzing qualitative data comprising:

A plurality of evaluation categories and a respective ranking system;

A closed curvilinear graph in which each unit of radius corresponds to a rank in the ranking system with each of the plurality of evaluation categories being placed at a location on the circumference of the closed curvilinear graph;

An output device for providing the evaluation categories and ranking system to an entity being evaluated;

An input device for having the entity select a rank in response in each respective category; and

A display plotting the ranking of each respective category as a node in the closed curvilinear graph in response to the ranking by the entity.

24. An apparatus for analyzing qualitative data comprising:

means for providing a plurality of evaluation categories and a respective ranking system;

means for providing a closed curvilinear graph in which each unit of radius corresponds to a rank in the ranking system;

means for placing each evaluation category at a location on the circumference of the closed curvilinear graph;

means for providing the evaluation categories and ranking system to an entity being evaluated;

means for having the entity select a rank in response in each respective category; and

means for plotting the ranking of each respective category as a node in the closed curvilinear graph in response to the ranking by the entity.